Should there be people at all in the individual States categories?

+5 votes
124 views
Should there be people at all in the individual States categories? Secondarily, should this include living people?

For example, see http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Category:Vermont
in Policy and Style by Sandi Wiggins G2G6 Mach 7 (70.1k points)

1 Answer

+5 votes
 
Best answer
Ideally, I would think not. They should be at the county level-- or if the state is large (in population), perhaps even the city level. But if we don't know which county or city they lived in, then I guess we fall back on the state level.

Having said all that, I'm not sure what value adding people to location categories provides. I suppose lacking the ability to search for people by location, a location category could help but only if every profile was so tagged. Seems to be a better investment to improve the search function.
by Jillaine Smith G2G6 Pilot (907k points)
selected by Maryann Hurt
I agree, the State level should be for organizing, not a place for individuals.

If a city or town is known, it can be helpful.  I was able to track friends of a Ricker Ancestor when he moved from Pennsylvania to Greeneville, TN.  This ultimately helped prove he was born in Penn. and was not the Ricker from Germany that so many have repeated.

Being able to see a list of folks living together in a small town could help identify those that knew and traveled together.
....these guys travelled together,,,   :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf_dQk9iaSY
Thanks Vincent, I needed that!
Bang on Vincent! Mags

Related questions

+4 votes
1 answer
+11 votes
2 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...