There is a proposed merge of Briant-35 and Briant-Searles-1. I have done extensive work on Briant-35, although I am not the profile manager of either of these profiles and did not initiate the merge.
I know that when I initiate a merge, I can tell which profile will be merged into the other. But at this point I can't tell. This merge is appropriate, and the appropriate destination is Briant-35. If it turns out that the proposed merge seeks to merge Briant-35 into Briant-Searles-1, I would reject it and turn it around.
It would be most helpful if in the messages of the merge, ALL the messages which currently say, "a merge has been proposed of Briant-Searles-1 AND Briant-35" could be changed to specify the direction of the merge, i.e. a merge has been proposed of Briant-Searles-1 INTO Briant-35. This change of one word would convey vital information which would prevent needless needs to change the LNAB after the merge!