Honestly, a significant number of these "errors" wouldn't exist if the database were created correctly - i.e. not allowing the creation of obvious errors. But, bit by bit, the special-interest politically-correct woosificatoon crew has bullied its way into forcing the IT staff to add the option of allowing mothers and fathers to be "non-biological" when compared to their children, allowing fathers to be flagged as of female sex and mothers to be flagged as male.
How about correcting the database and disallowing contributors to add altered reality, non-information that is clearly untrue. If a profile is identified as a mother, it should not have an option to identify as a male. Period. It should not have Y DNA tests attached to it - ever. If you have Y DNA results for a profile the subject is male and cannot be a mother regardless of how he dresses, feels or mutilates himself during life so there is NO need to have the option/possibility of creating such . The reciprocal is true for fathers. With two X chromosomes the subject is female, cannot be a father and shoukd have no option to ever be identified as male.
343,106 errors associated with misrepresented gender flags are reported on this report. If common sense limits corresponding to biology were in place on the database they wouldn't have to be corrected because they couldn't have been created. Those limits aren't in this database, and never will be, because someone will complain that feelings are getting hurt, that profiles with red "Privacy" levels should be allowed to be configured any way the PM wants because they aren't here for public consumption (never mind that one day, 200+ years from now, everyone on this site will surely be just as dead as our ancestors and a new generation will have to spend the time and energy to correct garbage profiles that become Open) - and no one will have the chutspa to just say "no".