I understand and appreciate your opinion. I'm sure a careful one-by-one effort would be better. I do put priority to fixing much greater messes than this and adding information where none exists at all. It's not a matter of disagreement, it is a matter of priority of effort. As for "spam" links, you will see that in each case exhibited in your response, the link refers back to a fuller description of the source. And, yes, source listings are not fun reading, but they do show information about where the source can be found. As for the image not there? Sources do refer to where images are available and the fact that the image doesn't exist in the source note seems hardly a fault.
But I do appreciate your input. Anyone else?