I've recently been researching and documenting/connecting the Wiggins family of Jamaica, Queens who descend from Thomas Wiggins, one of the town's original grantees.
There seems to be controversy in family trees as to whether this Thomas is *also* the same who was in Reading, Massachusetts.
See, for instance, FindAGrave disclaiming the connection: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=58242746
vs. Wikitree, for example: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Wiggins-244
, wherein the identities are conflated (by virtue of the daughter Sarah).
Specifically, this question plays out as whether https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Wiggins-244
should be merged with https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Wiggins-1478,
or whether Sarah Creed Wiggins should be detached from her current father, Wiggins-244, and attached to Wiggins-1478.
This family has a good page: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~woolsey/resources/descends/woolgen/wlrebecca1659_1731.html
begins with well-sourced information, but the last section devolves into unsourced assertions, particularly with respect to the connection to Massachusetts and Battersea, Surry Co., England.
EDIT: by the way, my first reaction is that Sarah Wiggins Creed is attached to the wrong father presently, but if the Reading connection is legitimate, I don't want to go in the wrong direction.