There are three Hezekiah Kilbourn(e)s on Wikitree, all of which are probably the same person, the father of Elisha Kilbourn, (Kilbourn-327). I want to link Elisha to one of the Hezekiahs to create a parent-child relationship, and possibly add additional information I have located. (I am not the profile manager of any of these Kilbourns, but I am a direct descendent).
From my research, Hezekiah "Kilburn" was born on 24 Jun 1700 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut to George "Kilburn" and wife Abigail. ( "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74P-HNT
: 3 December 2014), Hezekiah Kilburn, 24 Jun 1700; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown. )
Kilbourn-103 is the earliest potential match but has few details other than a birth date of 24 Jul 1700 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut. (Has no father, mother, siblings, spouse or children, and no sources listed.) "Kilbourn" here lacks the trailing 'e' of the next two profiles, and uses July 24, 1700 in Wethersfield, rather than June 24, 1700.
Kilbourne-192 was born 14 Jul, 1700 in Wethersfield, Hartford, CT., son of George Kilbourne and Abigail Atwood, spouse of Elizabeth (Allyn) Kilbourne, married December 19, 1722 in Wethersfield, Hartford, CT. No children are listed. (Note the birthdate is the 14th of July, 1700, rather than the 24th of June, 1700.)
Kilbourne-279 was born 24 Jun, 1700 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut. This best matches my information. It has Hezekiah married to Elizabeth (Allyn) Kilbourne (as does Kilbourne-192). My own sources say much the same about the marriage, except I found Elizabeth's last name spelled "Allen" rather than "Allyn".
Should I link Elisha to Kilbourn-103 since it is earliest likely Hezekiah profile, or avoid creating the link since the birth date is slightly wrong and there are so few corroborating facts?
Kilbourn-192 is the most complete and well-researched, but has a probable typo, making Hezekiah's birth date July 14, 1700 instead of June 24, 1700 in Wethersfield. I have no other issues with this profile.
Kilbourne-279 matches the birthdates and other information I have found, but isn't quite as complete as Kilbourn-192. Should I link to it, since it perfectly matches my information?
Should I completely avoid linking Elisha to any of them until someday when it possibly gets straightened out? (A merge has been proposed for the last two, but hasn't been done.) I don't believe Kilbourn-103 has been proposed as a duplicate.
What's the best way to approach this?