After learning the ropes, I only add profiles for those that I fully research and add my research to the profile. There are a huge number of profiles, seemingly added through gedcom, that have NO data or just birth and death years that are not verified.
Yesterday when a proposed merge of my fully researched profile and one with no data that I completed it messed up just about everything. Much of the research was lost, and it recreated duplicates of all those attached to the files.
Now today, I get all kinds of requests to merge the stupid duplicates. This is going to require a lot of time on my part who does the research and data correctly, and is caused because someone imported a name but did not develop the profile with any information or research whatsoever.
I hate to ignore the merge requests, and maybe there is a better way. But rather than waste my time on empty profiles, could WikiTree not require either they be developed better or deleted period. I had hoped that WikiTree would have researchers who were serious....but there is an over abundance of empty profiles. Could WikiTree not do something about them....like delete them so that serious researchers can put up a profile that has documentation?
I am sorry this is lengthy, but I am finding this very frustrating. And I DO NOT want more of my research documentation to be eliminated.
Thank you for considering my request for making a priority of deleting empty profiles.