Who is or isn't a Pioneer? Would this 3 question quiz help?

+8 votes
360 views
This question is for people working on Pioneer or Early Settler Projects and it's about deciding who is and isn't a Pioneer. How do we know if someone belongs in a Pioneer category?

example: Australia. Defining Pioneers in terms of dates will be different for different states and even for different areas within states. Eg South Australia was founded in 1836 (ish) but Europeans encamped and even set up farms and trade on Kangaroo Island decades before that.

So is a cut-off date the only, or the best way to decide who is a pioneer?

I'm pondering whether this little three question quiz might be the solution, eg

1)"Did you or your parents come to this locality from somewhere else" If "No" you are not a pioneer. If "Yes, go to next question"

2.) When you or your parents came to this locality, was it substantially unsettled by Europeans? If "No" you are not a pioneer. If "Yes" go to the next question.

3) Did you or your parents arrive in this locality within 30 years of the first European settler?  If "No", you are not a pioneer. If "Yes" you ARE a pioneer.

Try this out on some of your pioneer ancestors and see if it works and let me know in an Answer below.
in The Tree House by Living Turner G2G6 Mach 4 (41.8k points)
edited by Living Turner
I wonder why European Is used to help define pioneer?
For the first 30 years of the Australian colonies the predominance of arrivals was from Europe, or were on European ships. Not true of everyone of course but substantially true.
I read Australia as an example, did not realize the pioneer in this instance only referred to settlement of Australia.

Sorry.
I assumed it was Australia because of the tag "Australian_Convicts". Your comment is still valid Kristina.
Good comment Kristina. I was conscious while writing that European might not apply in all cases. Even the term Pioneer is Euro-centric. I'm sure indigenous groups whose land was being occupied would use very different terminology.
Non indigenous could be used instead of European.
I've edited the opening sentence to make it clearer that this question is mainly for people working on Pioneer/Early Settler Projects. Others may not see the point.
And now you have me wondering about the European sailors in 1700s and 1800s who ʻjumped shipʻ and remained where their feet hit solid ground. Some married indigenous women (maybe not in Australia) and became totally incorporated into the indigenous culture. Were they pioneers? Probably never set off to settle a new land...........

Or the example of the 49ers who crossed vast unsettled land from Missouri to California, where there were already Euro-centric settlements.

Well, I think I have gone far afield of what you are trying to define, Anne. I think I do this just to share my addled thoughts. Your questions are valid and will help define pioneers for your project.
That's not so far afield, Kristina.There were sailors who were landed on the Australian coast to collect skins and process whale oil.I know of at least one who was told the ship would come back in 6 months and it didn't come back for two years. In the meantime he'd done very well selling skins to any passing ship and set up a cosy farm with an indigenous woman as his common law wife. Needless to say he didn't get back on the ship when it finally came back to get him and his ancestors are still living on Kangaroo Island today. I definitely include these people as pioneers.
Ouch. Question 2 feels painfully colonialist and disregarding of indigenous cultures :-(

Unfortunately, I don't have a better definition or way of phrasing that question, and recognise that some of my ancestors probably qualify for the "pioneer" tag for South Australia, and definitely for some parts of it. I have not found much evidence of interactions between my ancestors and the First Peoples that they may have displaced. I'm not sure if that's a "good thing" or a "bad thing".
Scott, I think the whole concept of Pioneer is colonial. But that's what they did - they came to countries like Australia to colonise them, armed with an enormous sense of entitlement.  Plenty to feel uncomfortable about, but that's what you get when you start delving into the lives of your forebears. When I do profiles of forebears who obviously took over land that would have belonged to eg the Kaurna people, I put a note that I acknowledge their ownership and that they never ceded sovereignty.
I appreciate the comments.  However I am interested in what is being considered as a pioneer in United States.  I have some relatives that it states in their obituary or on Find a Grave that they were a Pioneer to the area, etc.  To me that means they were Pioneers.  

I just want to be sure before adding a ticker to them they are a pioneer in the United States

5 Answers

+1 vote
 
Best answer

I'd like to discuss the pioneers of South Australia.

Pioneers Association of South Australia (P.A.S.A.)
"Pioneer Members  
This category of membership is open to all persons who have at least one ancestor who arrived in the Province, now the State, of South Australia, on or before 28 December 1846."   http://www.pioneerssa.org.au/membership.html
(This date represents the 10th anniversary of the proclamation ceremony when Governor Hindmarsh arrived on the "Buffalo", even though there were eight ships arriving prior to the "Buffalo", starting 27 July 1836).
Anyone who had an ancestor arriving after this cut off date is not eligible to be a member.

Kangaroo Island Pioneers Association (K.I.P.A.)
"Membership is open to anyone who is a descendant of pioneers who arrived or settled prior to, or after the establishment of the first settlement on 27th July, 1836; soldier settlers and their descendants; and all persons interested in promoting the objects of the Association." https://sites.google.com/site/kipaview/membership 
You can see that this criteria is much more inclusive. The reasons why there is no cut off date is that there were periodic waves of departures and waves of arrivals to and from the Island, and that "pioneering" kept on occurring.

The original indigenous inhabitants of Kangaroo Island left a couple of thousand years ago, for reasons that are unclear.

The next wave of inhabitants were European whalers and sealers, for the most part wild and lawless. Some kidnapped aborigine "wives" from the mainland and from Van Dieman's Land (Tasmania). Most didn't stay too long, and arguably, didn't contribute very much to the settlement and future of Kangaroo Island, although there were several notable characters, with their aboriginal partners, who made the island their home. https://sites.google.com/site/kipioneers/first-8-ships/residents-already-on-kangaroo-island-1836

Before the "Buffalo" in December 1836 eight ships despatched by the South Australian Company and the Colonization Commissioners arrived at Nepean Bay, Kangaroo Island. They had believed the Island was the site for the capital city, but they were "sold a pup". Almost immediately the surveyors looked elsewhere, settling on Adelaide. Everyone from those first eight ships (and a few more ships in the next few years) would have disembarked at Nepean Bay, probably living there for a time. But most would have stayed there for no more than a few months, moving to the mainland, never to return. Indeed by 1848 of the several hundred migrants, there were only about 25 people remaining at Nepean Bay.

The population across the Island slowly increased as the Government granted farming leases. In 1877 the Government caused the island to be surveyed and thrown open for selection, and so a large influx of population took place, mainly farmers from the mainland. World War I took its toll, but there was a post war wave. 

After World War II the next wave was a Returned Soldiers Settlement Scheme. Many of those soldiers have descendants living there today.

  • It can be argued that the "pioneers" could be defined as the first generation of those who headed each of these waves.
  • But some might insist that a pioneer would be a person arriving before a significant cut off date such as 1848, 1877, 1900, 1918, 1939 or 1947 (and staying for at least a year).
  • Others might argue it should be restricted to people who made a positive impact on the Island - but that idea gets a little dangerous, particularly with modern day descendants whose ancestor was arbitarily excluded!

So I can well appreciate Anne's suggested quiz. Although there would be modern day families who pride themselves of their pioneer ancestors, who actually don't fit that criteria.

by David Wilson G2G5 (5.8k points)
selected by Living Turner
+4 votes

Good questions. 

They generally fit with the definition of "Pioneer" - a person who is among the first to explore or settle a new country or area.

However, I would think a country would get to a point where most of it is settled, and after that, the dates would exclude people from being considered pioneers even though they might have been the first to explore or settle in that particular area. So in some ways a cut-off date is appropriate.

IMHO, coming to a locality "from somewhere else" might need a bit more defining. Where would somewhere else be? An hour away? or a different region? 

by Lianne Trevarthen G2G6 Mach 4 (46.7k points)
Hi Lianne. The best test is to try it out on lots of people in all sorts of situations, I think.  No doubt the questions would need tweaking and maybe a definition or two. Eg "locality" would be the one embraced by the project. The cut off date can also be determined for each project. For example anyone who spends a year on a research station in the Antarctic would still qualify as a pioneer today, whereas pioneers of somewhere like Germany would be lost in the mists of pre-history.
+2 votes
In my hometown, my ancestors were considered pioneers by their fellow settlers.  One arrived in 1885; the other arrived in 1899.  The area opened up for settlement in roughly 1881, but I'm learning about people who were here long before that date, although legally it was Ute land then.  One cut-off in the U.S. occurs when the homestead act ended, but few people who applied for homesteads in the later years are considered pioneers.  This is just one town in one U.S. state, and it isn't possible to clearly define the meaning of pioneer.  So to me, the question is meaningless.
by J. Crook G2G6 Pilot (229k points)
It becomes meaningful when you're working on a relevant Wikitree Project eg I'm working on "Australian Convicts and Free Settlers". Before long you find yourself wondering "When did being a "Settler" end? Do I include this person or not? So it's really a discussion point for people working on Pioneer Projects. Thanks for your interest though.
+1 vote
Its a great tool and rule of thumb; perhaps a definition of locality would help to better define
by George Churchill G2G6 Mach 9 (97.6k points)
Thanks for your feedback George. When the subject is early settlers or pioneers, the title of the Project usually defines the locality. (And interestingly, Wikitreers seem inclined to define smaller and smaller localities.) eg "Australian Convicts and Early Settlers." covers Australia, but "Pioneers of Kangaroo Island" covers just one small part of Australia. So when applied to a Project the locality will be self-evident.
+2 votes
Hmm, this just popped up, not seen previously.  The term Pioneer is applied differently depending on the region I think.  

For instance, PRDH (source in this area) has a list of ''Pionniers'' published online, consisting of men (gender bias there) who had male descent that carried their name down, they being the first ones here of that line.  They are not necessarily first settlers of an area.

Then we have the people who first settled in a specific location, who are also called Pionniers, irrespective of where they came from, since some moved from another nearby location and some were immigrants.
by Danielle Liard G2G6 Pilot (659k points)

Related questions

+8 votes
2 answers
177 views asked Aug 5, 2017 in Policy and Style by Living Turner G2G6 Mach 4 (41.8k points)
+3 votes
1 answer
173 views asked Nov 4, 2018 in The Tree House by Lee-Roy Harton G2G3 (3.2k points)
+22 votes
44 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...