Hi Betsy - nice to hear from you.
I confess I had never heard of Lewis DeRochbrune before you mentioned him.
I was however aware (too well) of a Philibert Couillaud de Rochebrune, who emigrated to Canada in 1665. Parents unknow and he was from the diocese of Nevers. But there was a story running about him that he was the son of Jean-Bernard-Philibert de Laroque, or Roquebrune, from Larroque-Ordan near Auch, in Gers, and Marie de Marcilly, sometimes also called Marie Damas (or Dalmas) de Marcilly. Marie de Marcilly in turn was said to be the daughter of Charlotte Couillaud de Hauteclaire. So there is a striking similarity with your report of Lewis's genealogy.
Philibert Couillaud's "ancestry" has been shown to be an invention of Robert de Roquebrune, one of his descendants in Quebec. There was a Bernard de Laroque, but he was too young to be Philibert's father. Marie "Damas" de Marcilly apparently did not exist. Her alleged mother, Charlotte Couillaud de Hauteclaire, most certainly did not exist (the full list of her alleged parents' children is known and includes no Charlotte and no daughter married to a Damas, Dalmas or Marcilly).
I understand that your ancestor was listed as Jehan Laroche. It is a good name and often found in France. I cannot tell why his name was changed from Laroche to Rochebrune, and this would be more a question for Quebecois specialists.
Jehan Laroche aka Rochebrune was certainly not related to Philibert Couillaud by the way, since Laroche was obviously educated, as a physician, and Philibert Couillaud was illiterate.
Here are some elements and references on this disproven genealogy.
I hope this helps - sorry if this is a bit unglamorous, though.