Jacomyntje Kunst, born approx. 1690 (based on date of her marriage), "is supposedly" the daughter of Jan Barentsen Kunst (born 1638, died by 1668 -- died kind of early to have a child in 1690!) and Jaquemijne Cornelis Slecht. Jacomyntje has a second profile https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Eltinge-17
that makes her a daughter of a later husband of Jaquemijne's, Jan Roelofsz Elting. No record has been found of Jacomyntje's birth (the records from Kingston, where she would have been baptized, are pretty sparse around 1690), and since she was recorded with the last name of Kunst at her marriage (documented to be her first marriage), it's likely that her father was named Kunst (not Elting).
Carrie added a note to Jacomyntje's profile indicating that she was most likely a granddaughter of Jan Barentsen Kunst, not his daughter. I agree, based on the dates.
I propose to disconnect both of Jacomyntje's profiles from all of the parents that are connected to them, then merge her two profiles into Kunst-50, since Kunst is the earliest last name documented for her. Any objections?