I don't want to be hypercritical, but it would be better if you leave better sources. For example, you have:
Surname Forename Age Sex Relation to head Religion OBrien John 40 Male Head of Family Roman Catholic OBrien Bridget 39 Female Wife Roman Catholic OBrien Susan 18 Female Daughter Roman Catholic OBrien Michael 16 Male Son Roman Catholic OBrien Catherine 14 Female Daughter Roman Catholic OBrien Francis 6 Male Son Roman Catholic OBrien Bridget 2 Female Daughter Roman Catholic
That's pretty hard to read and it doesn't tell me where to find the source so I can examine it and make an evaluation. That is pretty much what sourcing is for. This is how I would write the source:
- 1911 census:
- Census Returns of England and Wales, 1911. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the UK (TNA), 1911, database and digital images, "1911 England Census," Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011 (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 10 April 2018); citing Class: RG14; Piece: 3923; Schedule Number: 136
-
- This examples shows that I found the source on Ancestry, but is includes information about the original source so someone could easily find the correct Class, Piece, and Schedule Number. This information is easy because it is basically cut and paste. For the information contained you should make bullet points, or some other way to list:
: Surname Forename Age Sex Relation to head Religion
* OBrien John 40 Male Head of Family Roman Catholic
* OBrien Bridget 39 Female Wife Roman Catholic
* OBrien Susan 18 Female Daughter Roman Catholic
* OBrien Michael 16 Male Son Roman Catholic
* OBrien Catherine 14 Female Daughter Roman Catholic
* OBrien Francis 6 Male Son Roman Catholic
* OBrien Bridget 2 Female Daughter Roman Catholic
It's just easier to read.