Fitzwilliam-139 has child born in 1900's although she died in the 1600's. Cant be removed. Why???

+4 votes
91 views
I've removed the other indicated son, but there's something goofy about this one.  Need to repair the glitch and reinstate the other child, (Thomas).I KNOW it is a private person, but I don't know WHO it is, therefore I can't remove him so that I can complete a merge.  I need someone with the technical knowledge to remove him, or at least find out who he is so I can ask him to remove himself. Is there anyone out there, or do I just ignore the needed merge??
WikiTree profile: Margaret Montgomery
in WikiTree Tech by Lyle Montgomery G2G1 (1.8k points)
edited by Lyle Montgomery

2 Answers

+6 votes
The privacy level is private for the child in question.
by Doug Lockwood G2G Astronaut (2.4m points)
This does nothing to solve the problem.
+4 votes
The private child is Montgomery-393.  He's unlisted, but if you click here,

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Montgomery-393

 there will be a link to send a message to the profile manager.
by Nan Starjak G2G6 Pilot (269k points)
Thanks, that should do it.

Lyle

Related questions

+4 votes
1 answer
53 views asked May 30 in The Tree House by Jean Price G2G6 Mach 4 (41.2k points)
+3 votes
2 answers
+1 vote
2 answers
51 views asked Apr 16, 2019 in WikiTree Help by Wayne Westover G2G Rookie (160 points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright

...