A possible missing generation?

+4 votes
Ruth Devonshire was supposedly born somewhere between 1597 and 1600, so how could she have given birth to Gideon Tilghman in 1652 at such an advanced age? My guess is that there is a generation missing between Ruth, her husband Christopher and this Gideon fellow. Has anyone not stopped to consider the near impossibility of a 17th century woman having children at age 50+? Because it seems that Gideon and his siblings were all born well into the 1650s, which is nearly impossible. There must be a generation missing in there somewhere. Has anyone thought to look into this at all?
WikiTree profile: Gydeon Tilghman
in Genealogy Help by

The menopause can occur up to 55 years of age, though the average is 51. If she was alive at that age, she was probably capable of producing a child.

2 Answers

+3 votes

If you read the biography, you see that there is speculation on the birth dates as well as marriage date of the parents. If you have any primary sources showing correct birth  (or marriage) dates, please feel welcome to add them to the profiles of the parents and correct the dates, or if your speculation recarding the missing generation proves to be correct, add the correct parents. But please do not forget sources

by Juha Soini G2G6 Pilot (122k points)
+1 vote
My guess would be that the immigrant maybe wasn't quite the same person as the one in the Visitation book.  Unless there's a source.  "The Noble Tilghman Family and Its Splendiferous 1000-Year History" might not count.
by Living Horace G2G6 Pilot (647k points)

Related questions

+5 votes
1 answer
0 votes
1 answer
96 views asked Aug 9, 2019 in Genealogy Help by Frisby tilghman fiery
+3 votes
0 answers
+5 votes
2 answers
200 views asked May 2, 2019 in The Tree House by Pip Sheppard G2G Astronaut (2.8m points)
+2 votes
0 answers
137 views asked Jul 5, 2018 in Genealogy Help by Sue Boutle G2G6 Mach 2 (23.8k points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright