Joe and L,
Once upon a time (circa 1995) I had an idea for a web application that would track all nutrients in all foods that a user consumed. It could be used for many purposes - people on diets to gain/lose weight, body builders, diabetics, etc. I used the FDA's database that shows quantities of about 113 nutrients in a couple of million food items. I had it ready for launch and was trying to find a partner who could do the marketing part of the job when I saw a news article about a woman who sued one of the major canned food manufacturers because one nutrient was misstated by something like .02 milligrams and, as a result she didn 't lose the weight she expected to. For damages - including her pain and suffering, - she got something like 2 million dollars. That was the end of my product, which I expected to become very successful - I even had several doctors who wanted to have their patients use it and nutritionists lined up as subscribers - but I was terrified that somebody would sue me for data behind my application, even though it was the FDA's data, not mine.
Perhaps that's why it's so easy for me to understand the importance to Chris of bending over backwards to avoid possible exposure to any lawsuit. Even if a suit were totally groundless, it could still cost more money than probably all WikiTreers combined have and take several years to successfully defend against it.
Nobody is infringing on any of your rights to anything. WikiTree isn't a country, of which you are a citizen, nor does WikiTree have a constitution granting you "rights to free speech" or anything else. Nobody is obligated to give you a completely free soapbox here, from which you can disseminate anything - you thoughts, feelings, opinions, facts, or whatever. You have been granted membership here, which gives you the right to add your genealogy information, provided that you abide by the rules of the site. This is a private organization, with membership terms, privileges, and responsibilities. If you don't like the rules or policies or any other requirements that may restrict your actions here as a member then the only right you have is freedom to cancel your membership.
I wish everyone would recognize the seriousness of the threat Chris feels that has led him to adopt such drastic measures. Let's show our appreciation for what he is doing - his generosity in making this platform available and the risks he faces as a result - namely, existential ones to this platform as well as personal ones to himself. The least we could do is to accept the policy he feels a need to establish in order to mitigate his risk. C'mon folks, this isn't something up for discussion - it's a rule. I don't personally like it but I do understand why it's being implemented. I exhort y'all to either live with it or don't work here.