If you have an interest in the story of genetic testing for genealogy (and/or the confluence--or conflict therefrom--of science and business), this new, open-access paper by Debbie A. Kennett, Adrian Timpson, David J. Balding, and Mark G. Thomas will definitely engage you:
https://www.mdpi.com/2313-5778/2/4/47/htm
Far from diving into the nerdy stuff (which I admit I do enjoy) like gel electrophoresis, synonymous versus non-synonymous polymorphisms, or regions of heterochromatin, this does not require a genetics glossary or a mathematics degree to read. On the contrary, it's a look at an important piece of genetic genealogical history and how one testing company sought to rapidly capture a large market, got substantial press and spawned several subsidiary companies...and then shuttered its doors forever.
There were several compounding reasons for the failure of BritainsDNA, but if I were to sum it up in just two words, it would be: "bad science." Or, since we all know I always strive to get my message across in as few words as possible: "pseudoscience."
Worth the read!