Does the Magna Carta project protect gateway ancestors? [closed]

+9 votes
The linked profile is a gateway ancestor, apparently. And perhaps for that reason is protected. But there is no project co-managing the profile.

1. Does this profile need to remain protected?

2. If so, does MC want it? If no, we could add Massachusetts (since it falls outside of the PGM window)..

WikiTree profile: William Torrey
closed with the note: Magna Carta Project added as manager to both
in Policy and Style by Jillaine Smith G2G6 Pilot (838k points)
closed by Liz Shifflett
Here's another one for whom I have the same question:
Thanks for pointing these out Jillaine. I'll add Magna Carta Project as manager (the Project now has a project box appropriate for profiles of Gateways that are not yet in a project-approved trail, so we can do so now and still follow both WikiTree and project guidelines).

Cheers, Liz
Thanks, Liz.

Related questions

+2 votes
0 answers
+25 votes
4 answers
+18 votes
4 answers
+7 votes
1 answer
+5 votes
1 answer
+10 votes
3 answers
400 views asked Jul 1, 2015 in Genealogy Help by Vic Watt G2G6 Pilot (339k points)
+12 votes
9 answers

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright