I have the following ancestor list, see below, IS THIS CORRECT?

Question

PHILIP DARNALL (1604-167) + MARY CALVERT

Henry Darnall + Eleanor  Hatton

Henry Darnall, Jr. + 1) Elizabeth Lowe, 2) Anne Diggs

John Darnall +lizabeth Kemper

William "Capt. Billy" Darnall + Phyllis McFdden

Thomas Polk Darnall + Mary Jane Mcann

Answer 1

I see an ancestry tree, starting from the originator to the most recent descendent.  Have you the documentation to prove it?

Comments

Some of us have been chest deep in searches and have yet to come up with substantiated full ancestral paths. I suggest everyone doing Darnell research to keep digging deeper - the well-known "Darnall book" has errors ... it is a good location for lots of info, but don't take it as gospel until you find those primary records (many of which have yet to be digitized).

Answer 2

According to http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89066038340;view=1up;seq=27

Philip (b. 1604) m. Mary Calvert

Henry (1645-1711) m. Eleanor Hatton (the widow Brooke)

Henry (1682-abt 1759) m. Ann Digges (but not Elizabeth Lowe)

John (1708-1768) m. Mary Neale (and not Elizabeth Kemper)

William. (no further detail given)

Elizabeth Lowe is listed as married to a nephew of the Henry Darnall that married Ann Digges;

The only Kemper listed in the book is the mother of a bride who married a Darnall.

 

Comments

Suggestion:

RE:  Elizabeth Lowe.  Could you add (b-d dates)?.

Also:

 I had an Elizabeth Kemper who married a John Darnall or Darnell, Sr. (1738-1819), whom I believe was the son of Morgan J Darnall i.e. [Darnall-118], with children George (b 1759), Waught (b 1776), William (1777-1835), Abdell (Abdel or Abdiel) 1778-1853), Morgan (b1780), George (b 1780), and Jeremiah (1785-1866).  I show no parents for this Elizabeth Kemper.  Is that the Kemper you've mentioned?

Can other Darnall/Darnell enthusiasts confirm that they, too, have this as a correct family extension ... or indicate if there is any discrepancy?