My rationale for merging these profiles (and the other two Jung pairs):
They are both the exact same person. Whether or not they represent a real or fantasy person, the person is the same, with the same details, the same surname, and were merged into the lowest number represented in the Wikitree Jung surname database.
Both have the EXACT same details:
166 867
Michael Jung Michael Jung
1480-1530 1484-1531
b. Feuchtwangen b. Feuchtwangen
d. Frankenberg d. Frankenberg
both married in Oberacker
both married to the same woman - exactly the same woman save for a spelling change of Dorothea vs Dorothia
both have middle name Adam
both have mother of Anna (Urner) Jung
both married in 1509
both have father of Hans Jung
Prior to merge, I did an Ancestry soundex search and no names, other than Jung came back. There are multiple records for Michael Jung in Germany in this time period.
If the sources prove this to be a real person, he will be Jung-166. If not, he will be Jung-166 {{Disproven Existence}}.
But considering that these profiles represent the same person, with no surname variations, I saw no reason to hold on the merges.
best regards