Everything George said is true, but you can reformat the Ancestry entries to conform to the Chicago style of sourcing as recommended by Wikitree. I did the 1860 census on your profile. I moved your note to the top so that it is more noticeable and hopefully nobody will touch it (I guess I do not heed instructions). Also, the <references /> tag belongs directly below the == Sources == headline. You do not need to use the {{Ancestry Record}} template, but it was just shown to me and it is easy to form a link directly to the record on Ancestry. I used to put (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 26 December 2018) which goes to the homepage of Ancestry and then the user would have to do a search to find the 1860 Census record.
It is easy to find the links to the Ancestry record in the part I highlighted in bold in your name section. In the {{Ancestry Record||}} template, after the first bar | goes the db or dbid. This can be a number or in the example case the name of the database. After the second bar | goes the h= number. Those were both found in the highlighted section, which should now be deleted.
For the family trees, I just put them below the references in a section ''See also,''
* Ancestry Family Trees. Family tree files submitted by Ancestry members.
That alerts users that there are member submitted family trees that they can search for and look at. Ordinarily, these are only useful as hints and the links no longer work, as is true in your example.
