would it be possible to require at least a country to be visible on all private profiles?

+13 votes
Hi, i have over 1000 people on my watchlist and i find it frustrating that there are so many possible matches which are private and require messages before i can exclude them as a match.  I don't see that something as vague as a country would imperil anyone's privacy.  does anyone out there agree with me?  thanks.


Related Question:  http://www.wikitree.com/g2g/216189/locations-is-it-time-to-require-at-the-minimum-a-country
in Policy and Style by Joan Lichtmann G2G2 (2.5k points)
edited by Nae X
I agree.  It's especially annoying when you know the profile is of a person that is long ago deceased and the privacy is on red

I agree too - it would save a lot of time.... assuming that the country is correct that iswink

1 Answer

+1 vote

I'm only new to Wikitrees, but that would have been my first question also. I should think it is a logical expectation on any family history tree to show the country of birth and also of their death. My tree has a country named for every leaf on the tree. It arrives here on the gedcom but is discarded. Could it be included please

by Geoff Masters G2G6 Mach 1 (13.6k points)

Related questions

+35 votes
11 answers
+8 votes
2 answers
+5 votes
1 answer
+4 votes
3 answers
+8 votes
1 answer
102 views asked Jun 26, 2017 in WikiTree Tech by Chris Hoult G2G6 Mach 1 (19.0k points)

WikiTree  ~  About  ~  Help Help  ~  Search Person Search  ~  Surname:

disclaimer - terms - copyright