According to the changes on son, James, this profile was entered as Baldwin IX of Flanders (Emperor of Constantinople) who indeed died in 1205 but not in Scotland. Baldwin IX was son of Baldwin VIII, not Knut. Can Knut have been meant to be Knut IV of Denmark, father of Charles of Flanders? Wouldn't much matter except that this profile is said to be descended from David Earl of Huntingdon. The two sons James had been sitting as an unmerged match for 4 years. Tried to get them merged but the merge was again postponed on the grounds of dates. Can't say it too loudly, "Unsourced dates that arrived on a Gedcom in 2011 are probably meaningless."