pending merges already complete

Question 1

tonight attempted to compare pending merges; however, found the first two I tried to compare were completed in November. How long do they stay on the list? Seems a waste of time to compare only to find out they have been merged quite some time ago!

Goding-388 and Goding-88 is one example.

Question 2

Hi John,

I think this is what Maryann was asking about too: http://www.wikitree.com/g2g/82596/why-are-completed-merges-dated-nov-showing-in-pending-merges

I removed the broken pending merge for Goding-88. I'm not sure why it happened. If there's a regular pattern -- if you keep seeing these -- please post and we'll investigate.

Thanks,

Chris

Question 3

Chris,

I believe that there a lot of them. When you first click on pending merges the first two that showed up (Goding) and the second one had already been completed back in November.
check the following:

Spencer-4256 & -640

Boykin-280 & -11

Cooper-1583 & -560

next one down also
Your most welcome,

John

Chris Whitten · Answer 1 · 2014-06-16T13:12:36+0000

Hi John,

I think this is what Maryann was asking about too: http://www.wikitree.com/g2g/82596/why-are-completed-merges-dated-nov-showing-in-pending-merges

I removed the broken pending merge for Goding-88. I'm not sure why it happened. If there's a regular pattern -- if you keep seeing these -- please post and we'll investigate.

Thanks,

Chris

Chris,

I believe that there a lot of them. When you first click on pending merges the first two that showed up (Goding) and the second one had already been completed back in November.
check the following:

Spencer-4256 & -640

Boykin-280 & -11

Cooper-1583 & -560

next one down also
Your most welcome,

John — John Beeson, Jun 16, 2014

Categories

pending merges already complete

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions