Advise on adding 2 sources where there were none Yarbrough-367

Question

This profile is for Richard Yarbrough .   Not sure why an Elizabeth Bivens is also coming up ?  How do we solve that ? 

I am pre-1700 certified, but running these 2 sources by you all .  "Should" be good one is a land deed and the other a court record.  The dates make it impossible for the records to be his fathers.  

_{1. Sons of Richard 1702- ."An old vestry book of Blandford Church tells us that William was the church sexton, and the book contains numerous references to payments in tobacco for William's services. Richard’s son Richard moved to nearby New Kent County, and we are very fortunate to find several references to him there. In the following accounts of Richard in New Kent County, note how the clerks spelled Yarbrough. “Att a Generall Assembly begun att James Citty the 16 day of Aprill in the yeare of our Lord 1684. These following orders of publique charge and levy were made...New Kent County...to Richard Yarburg for his service severall tymes in discovering the Senerca Indians and other public service...333 p. tobacco.” “1685...The report has come from ye Commottee of Claims, relating to ye New York and Albany charge is by ye house allowed of and Auditor Bacon is desired to pay...To Richard Yarborough interpreter for his voyage and services.” “Att a Grande Assembly begunn att Greene Springs the 20 day of February 1676 these following orders of Publique Charge were made and allowed...to Richard Yarbey 6,000 p. tobacco.” “An act for the safeguarde and defence of the country against the Indians...and forty-one men out of the lower parts of New Kent County to be garrisoned at one fortt or place of defence between Yarburye’s house and Chickahomony Indian Towne on Mattapony River.” Possibly one or more of the above accounts concern the immigrant Richard, however must concern his son as in the Virginia Historical Magazine concerning the court trial of Captain Jacob Lumpkin in New Kent County.- New Kent - At a Court held Septem’ 29th, 1690, At Mr. Tunstall’s Gents - Coll. John West, Capt. Roger Malory, Mr. Thom. ffoster, Capt. Jos. ffoster, Mr. Robert Bird, Capt. John Lane, Mr. Jos. Story - Justices. It is Ordered upon returne of an Information Benjamin Arnold made before Capt. John Lane and Mr. Robert Bird, Justices, against Capt. Jacob Lumpkin for Seditious, unlawful and dangerous words expressed against their Majestyes and their present Governour, that ye Sheriff Sumon the said Capt. Lumpkin and all the Evidense to Appeare at the house of Mr. Edmond Tunstall on ye 9 day of Octob' next, when the Court have Appointed to meet and examine the evidence therein and alsoe that ye Sheriff give all the Northside Gentlemen Notice hereof for Speedy Tryall of ye matter. Teste: Job. Howes, Cl. Cur. Richard Yarbrough, Aged 38 years or thereabouts, Sworne, Saith: That your Depon’ being att ye house of Benjamin Arnolds about ye beginning of September last, in company with Severall p’sons of ye neighbourhood & drinking their Maj. health, King William & Queen Mary, ye said Capt. Lumpkin refused to name them but said he would drink ye King & Queen's health, which did disturb Severall of ye company & words ariseing Capt. Lumpkin was for going, & severall of ye Company followed him towards his horse & amongst ye rest Joseph Clarke importuned him to stay & be conformable, but he refused & in like manner refused to name the Govern' health being named by severall of ye Company Govern; Nicholson’s health, or move his hat, but he mounted his horse & yo’ Depon’ being att some distance heard ye said Capt. Lumpkin say with a loud voyce he would fight ye Govern’. Whereupon ye said Joseph Clarke tooke him up & threatened to beat him & alsoe pulled him off his horse. And I heard noe more from him afterwards, & further Saith not. Richard Yarbrough (his mark)" <ref> The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography Collection jstor_virghistbiog; jstor_ejc; additional_collections; journals, Vol. 6, Pages 389-393 . https://archive.org/details/jstor-4242197/page/n5?q=Richard+Yarbrough </ref> 2. Indenture made 5 March 1747 between John Simms of Surry County and Richard Yarbrough of Brunswick, £20, on North side of Rattle snake Creek, 200a, Beginning on Rattle Snake Creek at a maple thence a north Course to a black jack a Line tree belonging to a Certain Tract of Land granted by patent to George Simms thence to a Corner black Gum on the School house spring Branch thence down the sd. Branch to the mouth of the Meadow branch to a corner sweat gum thence up the meadow a strait course to the old Line to a corner hiccory thence an East Course along the Old Line to a Corner red oak of William Simmses thence along Wm. Simms's Line to John Simmses Spring Branch then down the Branch a southerly Course to the Creek then up the Creek to the Beginning. Signed John Simms. Witnesses: John Yarbrough, James Lanier, David Townes. Court May 6, 1747, Indenture &c; memorandum were acknowledged by John Simms. Deed Book 3, Page 299. <ref> http://sites.rootsweb.com/~vabrunsw/deeds/brundb3.htm </ref> == Sources ==}     

_{Please advise.  And advise on the profile confusion with Ms. Bivens}

_{Thanks, Trish ( born Loretta}

Answer 1

I think you are confusing Yarbrough-367 (Elizabeth) with Yarborough-367, Richard.

Comments

Thank you Kathie!

---

Elizabeth Yarbrough Bivens is Yarbrough-367,

Richard Yar BOR ough  is  Yarborough-367.  Two different people, two different spellings.  Richard Yarbrough, Yarbrough-49 is the father of Richard Yarborough, Yarborough-367.  Spelling seems to be uncertain, or changed between generations.

---

Oh ok I see I edited the right guy then !  Whew.  I just left out the extra " r" in his spelling in the right location, fixed now. Thank you !

---

I have also moved the generic *familysearch.org put in by the profile creator or another user,  from the Source listing up into the bio as see notes. As that is not  a valid source.