no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Barnes (abt. 1639 - abt. 1670)

James Barnes
Born about in St Botolph Adgate Parish, London, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of
Died about at about age 30 in Jamestown, Colony of Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Tim Barnes private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Feb 2015
This page has been accessed 1,006 times.

Contents

Notes

  • FTM Sullivan/Welch Tree

Biography

James was born in 1594. James Barnes ...

  • m: Mary Williamson, 1627-04-10, Alconbury Cum Weston, Huntingdon, England [1]

James was born in 1610.

Sources

  1. "England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NKNW-M6X : 10 December 2014), James Barnes and Mary Williamson, 10 Apr 1627; citing Alconbury Cum Weston, Huntingdon, England, reference , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,040,595.

Acknowledgements

  • Information as entered by Tim Barnes, Wednesday, February 25, 2015.
  • Ancestry Family Trees




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of James's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Barnes-6772 and Barnes-16546 do not represent the same person because: The birth locations and the Virginia destinations are different enough to suggest two like named individuals as opposed to one.
posted on Barnes-16546 (merged) by Leigh Anne (Johnson) Dear
Barnes-6772 and Barnes-16546 appear to represent the same person because: These two profiles need to be merged because Barnes-16546 is an unsourced and superfluous profile and the only way to get rid of a superfluous profile is to merge it into another. If you don' t take issue with this please approve and merge. If you do take issue please post a primary source or two so that my reconciliation efforts are supported. Thanks for your help.
posted on Barnes-16546 (merged) by Leigh Anne (Johnson) Dear

Rejected matches ›

B  >  Barnes  >  James Barnes