Additional child: Susan/Susannah, m. son of William Weeks, in Norwalk
His will is dated 10 May 1760 with witnesses sworn on 9 June 1760 and proved on 10 June 1760 in Fairfield.[1]
His inventory was taken on 19 May 1760 and recorded at Fairfield.[2]
The estate distribution was recorded on 6 June 1769.[3]
Sources
↑ “Probate Records, v. 13-14, 1753-1764”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-892K-YBFT : 8 June 2022), FHL microfilm 007627296, image 325, Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut, Vol 14, 1761-1763, Page 46-47.
↑ “Probate Records, v. 13-14, 1753-1764”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-892K-YB6M : 13 June 2022), FHL microfilm 007627296, image 403, Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut, Vol 14, 1761-1763, Page 204-205.
↑ “Probate Records, v. 15-16, 1764-1775”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L92K-Y937-1 : 21 June 2022), FHL microfilm 007627304, image 388-389, Fairfield, Fairfield, Connecticut, Vol 16, 1767-1775, Page 261-262.
Selleck, Charles. Norwalk (The Author, Norwalk, Conn., 1896) Page 339
Betts, Frederic H., 1888. Thomas Betts, of Guilford and Norwalk, and his Descendants. (based on the work of Caroli Wyllys Betts, deceased) pages 37, 55-56
Connecticut, Deaths and Burials Index, 1650-1934 [database on-line]. Provo, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Index entries derived from digital copies of original and compiled records.
Connecticut Deaths and Burials, 1772-1934 [index], Salt Lake City, Utah: 2009, 2010. Ancestry.com.
Is Joseph your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Joseph by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Craig Betts :
Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 12 markers, haplogroup I-M170, FTDNA kit #N85079 +
Y-Chromosome Test 12 markers, haplogroup I-M170
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Joseph:
Bettis-210 and Betts-1655 do not represent the same person because: See the explanation at the top of https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Bettis-210. No confirmation that it was correct birth date or parents, and there was definitely a Joseph Betts.