no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Churchill) Blakey

Sarah Blakey formerly Churchill
Born [date unknown] [location unknown]
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died about [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Pamela Parker private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 732 times.

This person was created through the import of Acrossthepond.ged on 21 February 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.

Death

Death:
Date: ABT 1690

Removed ABT from Death Date and marked as uncertain.

User ID

User ID: 1E9A982C3E0648548DB0125B76E98B2F1FA3




Is Sarah your relative? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Sarah's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
My question is still why does this profile even exist? No sources, no birth date, only an estimated death date that generates a db_error. No profile improvement since being imported from gedcom 6 years ago.

We have solid evidence (the family Bible pages that include entries by Sarah George) that Churchill Blakey's mother was Susannah - why is Sarah attached instead w/o evidence? I know *how* it happened: I had Susannah on the other profile before the merge, but Sarah was chosen during the merge. What I don't get is *why*.

I'm not a PM here but it shows up as an error in my list because of the son being attached. I'd like to resolve it before some data doctor unfamiliar with the family comes along and starts changing the wrong things to make the error go away.

Can start G2G if need

posted by [Living Anonymous]
Churchill Blakey could not have been born a year after his mother died.
posted by Cheryl (Stone) Caudill
Apparently we lost a connection from the merge. I have Churchill son of Thomas Blakey and Catherine Susannah Churchill rather than her sister Sarah. I am aware that there are sources that say it was Sarah. Even though they're sisters, I'd like to have the right great-granny. I will recheck my sources but it isn't conclusive either way from what I recall.
posted by [Living Anonymous]

C  >  Churchill  |  B  >  Blakey  >  Sarah (Churchill) Blakey