The baptism has her born at 8 South Lambeth New Road, like most of her siblings, and her father is a baker.
Assault John Napier was charged with having assaulted his wife, Amy Napier, and mother-in-law, Amy Clark. The case being proved, accused was ordered to be bound over in the sum of £10 to keep the peace towards both the complainants, or in default, to be imprisoned for six months.[1]
Amy was not mentioned in her father's will.
WIFE DESERTION.
A Bad Case.. At the Christchurch Magistrate's Court to-day before Mr H. W. Bishop, S.M., John Napier was charged with deserting his wife, Amy Napier. Mr Donnelly appeared for the complainant, who deposed that she had been married twenty-three years, and had thirteen children. On June 7 she left her home in consequence of her husband threatening to take her life. He had ill treated her during the whole of her married life, and had frequently beaten her. At present she had no means of support. Her husband was a blacksmith and forced her to work in his shop. He had been bound over to keep the peace towards her and other people. In cross-examination, complainant admitted threatening to run a carving knife through her husband on June 7. This was in consequence of his ill-treatment towards her. The evidence of Clarence, Frederick and Ethel Napier, showed that their father had turned them away from their home, and thrown dishes, chairs and other things at their mother; He had also ill-treated her in various ways, and used bad language towards her. Accused, in defence, denied having deserted his wife ; on the other hand, he had always provided her with the necessaries of life. The Magistrate ordered him to pay 10s a. week towards the support of his wife.[2]
John Napier was charged with being in arrears to the extent of £2 on an order of the court to pay 10s a week towards the support of his wife, Amy Napier. Mr Russell appeared for the complainant, who applied to have _ the order increased. Defendant admitted that the arrears were due, but said he was not able to contribute more than 10s a week. Defendant was ordered to pay the arrears on or before Friday next; in default fourteen days' imprisonment. The application to have the order increased was adjourned till Friday next- [3]
Case Dismissed.- Amy Napier applied to have a maintenance order against her husband, John Napier, increased from 10s. a week. Mr Donnelly appeared for the applicant, and Mr Byrne for the defendant. There was no evidence to show that defendant was able to contribute more than 10s a week towards his wife's support, and the application was dismissed. [4]
Is Amy your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Amy by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Amy: