no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hannah (Dickinson) Kellogg (1666 - 1745)

Hannah Kellogg formerly Dickinson
Born in Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts Baymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1691 in Hatfield, Hampshire County, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 79 in Colchester, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Jan 2011
This page has been accessed 1,101 times.
Connecticut Flag
Hannah (Dickinson) Kellogg is a part of Connecticut History.
Join: Connecticut Project
Discuss: connecticut

Biography

Hannah Dickinson, daughter of Nathaniel and Hannah, was born in Hatfield, Massachusetts on Jan 18, 1666. She married Samuel Kellogg of Colchester, Connecticut and "probably" died Aug 3, 1745. [1]

Date: 1691[2]

Sources

  1. A History of Hatfield, Massachusetts, in Three Parts By Daniel White Wells and Reuben Field WElls. Publisher F.C.H Gibbons : Springfield, Mass. 1910 (Pg: 389)
  2. Source: Massachusetts Marriages, 1695-1910 Note: https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCHJ-L8Z Name: Samuel Kellogg Spouse's Name: Hannah Dickinson Event Date: 1691 Event Place: Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts
  • WikiTree profile Dickenson-91 created through the import of Ellen Kropp_s Family Tree.ged on Sep 7, 2011 by Ellen Kropp.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Katherine, does this profile continue to need PPP? If so, there's a Connecticut project:

and template: simply: "Connecticut"

posted by Jillaine Smith
Dickinson-3883 and Dickinson-354 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth year, and although there is no husband mentioned, daughter's last name is Kellogg which matches with Dickinson-354
posted by John Atkinson
Dickinson-2176 and Dickenson-91 are not ready to be merged because: Dickinson-354 appears to be the lowest number with the correct name, both these profiles should be merged into that one
posted by John Atkinson
Dickenson-91 and Dickinson-2176 appear to represent the same person because: Last names are practically the same, birth dates are the same, and Dickinson is the generally accepted spelling of the last name.
posted by Mike Burger

D  >  Dickinson  |  K  >  Kellogg  >  Hannah (Dickinson) Kellogg

Categories: Connecticut Project-Managed