1871 Census, Ticehurst, Sussex, England: George is enumerated as 2-year-old Charles Forward, born Sussex. His older brother, Charles Albert has been counted as Albert. [2]
1881 Census, Ticehurst, Sussex, England: George E. Forward, son, aged 12, born Ticehurst, Sussex. [3]
↑ "England and Wales Census, 1881," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27W-BX8V : 11 December 2017), George E Forward in household of Philadelphia Forward, Ticehurst, Sussex, England; from "1881 England, Scotland and Wales Census," database and images, findmypast (http://www.findmypast.com : n.d.); citing p. 3, Piece/Folio 1045/64, The National Archives, Kew, Surrey; FHL microfilm 101,774,462.
"England and Wales Census, 1901," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XSJS-DBL : 20 May 2019), George Forward, Etchingham, Sussex, England, United Kingdom; from "1901 England, Scotland and Wales census," database and images, findmypast (http://www.findmypast.com : n.d.); citing Salehurst subdistrict, PRO RG 13, The National Archives, Kew, Surrey.
"England and Wales Census, 1911," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X7BL-FD3 : 12 July 2019), George Forward, Ticehurst, Sussex, England, United Kingdom; from "1911 England and Wales census," database and images, findmypast (http://www.findmypast.com : n.d.); citing PRO RG 14, The National Archives of the UK, Kew, Surrey.
Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA test-takers in his direct paternal line.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line: