no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Unknown Gresham (abt. 1660 - aft. 1704)

Unknown Gresham
Born about in New Kent, Virginiamap
[spouse(s) unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 44 in King and Queen, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Jack Wise private message [send private message] and Mary Gresham private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 26 Nov 2015
This page has been accessed 1,583 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.

Biography

Note: This is a Placeholder Profile that includes all the Greshams that do not have valid documented records as to their parentage. It is a Theory.

John or Edward or George or Thomas Gresham are estimated to have been born between 1665-1670. These are the 4 Gresham men listed on 1704 QRR for King and Queen County. They are the theorized sons of Edward Gresham Immigrant to Virginia in 1650 because the number of acres they were taxed on equals the number of acres held by Edward Immigrant by patents in 1650, 1675 and 1690 Resurvey.

There are no records that absolutely prove whether George or John or Edward is the father for the next generation of Gresham children. It is not correct to assign children to one of these 3 debated men as the father without proper valid documentation. The only son of Edward that has a documented lineage is Thomas d. 1741 in Spotsylvania.

They are all grouped together here under Placeholder Father as a THEORY ONLY but it is more genealogically correct than dividing them up and putting some children under George, some under Edward, some under John with just a loose theory. There are certain groupings of siblings that are closely associated by deeds, wills and migration patterns but to know for certain which man their father is unproven.

Note: A Ydna Study is currently underway at FTDNA and is trying to align the descendant lines of these 4 Gresham men. If you are a Gresham male please consider joining the Gresham/Grissom/Grisham Surname Project at 111 markers and then the Big Y DNA Project.

Sources





Is Unknown your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Unknown by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Unknown:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Gresham-386 and Gresham-547 do not represent the same person because: Two different people
posted by Mary Gresham
Gresham-310 and Gresham-547 do not represent the same person because: Not the same person
posted by Mary Gresham
Gresham-386 and Gresham-1231 appear to represent the same person because: Merging into main profile
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Mary Gresham
Gresham-310 and Gresham-1231 appear to represent the same person because: Merging into main profile.
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Mary Gresham
Gresham-547 and Gresham-1231 appear to represent the same person because: Merging into main profile.
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Mary Gresham
Gresham-386 and Gresham-1231 do not represent the same person because: These are not the same person.
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Mary Gresham
Gresham-386 and Gresham-1231 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicates
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Jack Wise
I am arranging all these children under a Gresham "place holder" because no documentation exists that clearly show which of these 4 Gresham men was their father. All we have are family associations using deeds, wills and migration patterns. That is not enough. There are too many theories floating around that confuse people, adding errors to the already error prone Gresham trees on all other genealogy websites. Theories are fine if they are clearly labeled as such, but WIKI is about clearing out old family legends with proper sources. Most of the older Gresham theories are being accepted as fact, using family research that was only a theory to begin with and old Gresham Books that contradict each other and have blatant errors in them. This is the purest, most accurate way I can think of to assign them a parent until the results of the Ydna studies can provide a better direction. We do not really know who the original Briar Hill Greshams were, who the sons of Edward Immigrant in 1650 were, how the two Thomas Greshams fit into the picture.
posted on Gresham-1231 (merged) by Mary Gresham

G  >  Gresham  >  Unknown Gresham

Categories: Unsourced Profiles