no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

George Goff Hatfield Sr. (abt. 1720 - aft. 1795)

George Goff Hatfield Sr.
Born about in Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [mother unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 75 in Lee County, Virginia, USAmap
Profile last modified | Created 12 Nov 2014
This page has been accessed 12,592 times.


Contents

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
George Hatfield Sr. was a Virginia colonist.
George Hatfield Sr. lived in Appalachia, in Kentucky.
{{{image-caption}}}
George Hatfield Sr. is currently protected by the Native Americans Project for reasons described below.
Join: Native Americans Project
Discuss: native_americans

Due to claims that he was married to a Native American, this profile is being co-managed and tracked by the Native Americans project.


He was born about 1720 in Virginia and was possibly the son of Richard Hatfield, Sr. This is questionable since Richard Sr. was in his 60s when George was born, so another generation should probably exist between Richard Sr. and George. Due to George being the earliest provable person of the "Southwest Virginia" line this line is often referred to as the “George Goff Hatfield” line or “George Hatfield” line.

In 1771 he resided in Botetourt County, Virginia. [1]

The muster list of Robert Doach for those in the Clinch River area included George Hatfield and his sons, Jeremiah Hatfield and George Hatfield (Jr.). These 2 sons lived on the north fork of the Holston River. [2]

Records for Washington and Russell County, Virginia include a petition dated 09 Dec 1785 to the Virginia House of Delegates by sundry inhabitants of Clinch River, Moccasin Creek, Powell's Valley and others requesting that militia districts be redrawn such that these citizens will more easily perform militia duties without long travel away from their defenseless families. Among those signing are two George Hatfields (George, Sr., and his son, George, Jr.), his sons John and Ephraim, plus Eurious Smith, Ericus Smith and Eli Smith (all in-laws of Ephraim). [3] [citation needed]

In 1786 a George Hatfield received a land grant on Lewis Creek in the area of Clinch River, Washington County, Virginia ... but it is uncertain whether this was Sr. or Jr.

He appeared on the 1795 tax list for Lee County, Virginia.

He died after 1795 in Lee County, Virginia, USA.

On 28 Nov 1809, his son, George Hatfield, Jr. and wife Sarah, deeded land on Lick Branch in Lee County, Virginia, USA to their son, Abner Hatfield. [4]

Abner Hatfield sold this land in 1818.

Not Named “George Goff Hatfield

George Hatfield Sr. and his son George Hatfield Jr. are mistakenly referred to as “George Goff Hatfield Sr. and George Goff Hatfield Jr. This is because on the 1809 deed transferring property between George Jr and son Abner Hatfield, the deed was given to the courthouse clerk to copy. When the clerk was writing George Jr’s and Abner’s names in the grantor and grantee places in the deed book the clerk either 1) mistakenly wrote “George Gof” or 2) used a page that had already been started for a George Goff but not completed (there was a Goff family in the area). Either way it was not feasible to attempt to correct mistakes by removing the page from the book. The clerk simply crossed out (interlined) the “Gof” and wrote “Hatfield beside it.

At the bottom of the page, where George Jr. was to sign it, the clerk wrote George’s name and George Jr. put his “X”.

Where George put his “X” the name was “George Hatfield” NOT “George Goff Hatfield”. In fact you will not find one single document where George Sr. or George Jr. placed their “X” by “George Goff Hatfield”. Outside of this clerical error that the clerk corrected by interlining the “Goff” you will also not find one single contemporary document or any other piece of paper where someone else refers to either of them as “George Goff Hatfield”. George Sr and George Jr only referred to themselves as “George Sr” or “George Jr”.

Identity of Wife

As to the identity of George’s wife, for decades it was Margaret Winas. Then it was Margaret Logan, daughter of Chief John Logan of the Mingo tribe. Problem is that the Chief never had a daughter that lived into adulthood & got married, so she’s out. Now it’s Marthy Thoms=Toms.

Marthy Thoms comes from the oral history of the descendants of a man named George Hatfield who lived in Persequinans County in Northeast North Carolina, hundreds of miles from Southwest Virginia. Unfortunately an examination of the entire story shows that it does not conform to Virginia history as written in documents and the history books. This places the marriage between George and Marthy in doubt.

Children

  1. Joseph Hatfield, b: 1739-1751; d: 1832; m: 1779 Rachel Smith
  2. Jeremiah Hatfield, b: c1750; d: c1832 NC; m: Fanny=Fannie Holland
  3. George Hatfield, Jr., b: c1752 VA; d: c1810 Lee Co, VA; m: Sarah Ann Lynch
  4. John Hatfield, b: 1755 VA; d: c1850 Marion Co, TN; m: Rebecca Bottom
  5. William Hatfield, b: 1740; m: 1760 Nancy ???
  6. Andrew Hatfield, b: 1745.

Research Notes

It was once believed that this George "Goff" Hatfield was the son of Abraham George Hatfield, Sr. and Margaret Winas of the "Matthias Hatfield of New Jersey" line, however DNA has since proved that the 2 lines are separate and distinct.

There have been multiple suggestions as to his wife, but the following 3 have been disproven ...

- Margaret Winans
- Margaret Logan, daughter of John Logan, a Mingo Indian Chief
- Martha "Marthy" Thoms=Toms, daughter of Foster Toms, a known Quaker.
In other documents, his wife was identified as Margaret (unknown, b: c1720 Russell Co, VA). [5]


Disambiguation

George "Goff" Hatfield should not be confused with Abraham George Hatfield of the New Jersey Hatfields and a descendant of Matthias Hatfield and husband of Margaret Winas or Winan.

For an excellent review of this issue see "Disproof-Connection to Abraham Hatfield" posted 31 Mar 2006 by Don Pendell on ancestry.com

Sources

  1. 1771 Botetourt County, Virginia Tax Record included tithables, "George Hatfield and sons George and Jeremiah" who are therefore born before 1750.
  2. Hatfield Family mentions that an early land survey made on 06 Dec 1774 in Fincastle County, Virginia, place the brothers, Jeremiah and George Hatfield, Jr. on the north fork of the Holston River.
  3. Comment from Linda at Millinnium3
  4. Russell County, Virginia Deed citing FHL#32427; copied into Lee County, Virginia Deed Book#2; p255; with image of Gof crossed out; from George Hatfield to Abner Hatfield, 28 Nov 1809
  5. http://ancestry.com/tree/73918621/person/32288083433/
  • Tax Lists for Lee County, Virginia posted on Ancestry.com message board on 25 Aug 2011 by rdeirth
  • "History of Perquimans County, North Carolina" by Watson Winslow
.1 George "Goff" Hatfield, b: 1715
..2 Joseph Hatfield
...3 Jeremiah Hatfield, Sr.
....4 William Carroll Hatfield
.....5 Arrena Hatfield m: John Jones (with DNA testing);
also see good review




Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with George:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 19

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hatfield-6898 and Hatfield-1215 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
I checked ancestry.com and there is a flaw in the sources for his wife's profile.

profile quote> Her will was probated in Perquimans Co, NC, on 5 Feb 1784. [4]

This 1784 Will is for a Mrs. Martha Toms, and not his wife, Mrs. Martha (Toms) Hatfield. So that would infer that she cannot be a daughter of Foster Toms.

posted by N Gauthier
Great catch, NG.

I concur that this means that Mrs Martha (Toms) Hatfield did not die, then, in 1784, but how did you infer that *this* evidence means she was not daughter of Foster Toms?

posted by Jillaine Smith
I just meant that she was not the Mrs. Martha Toms with the 1784 Will and thus if the Hatfield wife was assumed to be a Toms due to that, then she could end up having any unknown surname ... and might not even be a Martha. Some type of valid souce is needed for his wife.

On one of these family profiles, it referred us to a post debunking Martha's surname and implied that the childrens names must have come from a found Will. However I found that the children's names were mentioned in a book called "History of Perquimans County, North Carolina" by Watson Winslow which did not supply the wife's maiden surname.

Another thing is that though a George Hatfield mentions a Toms family, we can not tell which "George Hatfield" wrote that Will. His Will date is different from this George's death year.

posted by N Gauthier
edited by N Gauthier
P.S., I do see problems, though, with the Martha as daughter of Foster Toms based on what's on her profile. NG, are you willing to extract key points from the 1784 will? Also the Foster Toms will referenced on her profile? (We should probably move this discussion over to her profile...)
posted by Jillaine Smith
I find it very hard to read the handwriting in those old Wills and usually don't have the patience to try and decipher. My first glance at them showed accounting and sale items and did not easily show the Will. One of the links had 35 images and another link had over 100 images ... and it might not even be related to any Hatfield. So I am not encouraged to spend my time that way :(
posted by N Gauthier
Hatfield-2588 and Hatfield-1215 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same sons
posted by N Gauthier
Hatfield-5275 and Hatfield-2588 do not represent the same person because: have added descendants for one profile which show he is different; and will initiate merge for other profile into a different profile
posted on Hatfield-2588 (merged) by N Gauthier
Hatfield I-1 and Hatfield-2588 appear to represent the same person because: same family, no sources for Hatfield I-1
posted on Hatfield-2588 (merged) by Robin Lee
Martha Toms had no connection to John Logan.
posted by Kathie (Parks) Forbes
Some believe that Abraham is not George's father and Margaret is not his mother nor is Margaret Winans is wife. Wife is rumored to be Mingo tribe.See discussion at http:boards.rootsweb.com/topics.crime.hatfield-mccoy/481.7/mb.ashx for more info.
posted by Martha Garrett
Hatfield-2624 and Hatfield-1215 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and children

Difference in dates to be noted in the biography until a source can be added.

Hatfield-1335 and Hatfield-1215 appear to represent the same person because: same wife
posted by Sally x
There's no provable connection between Joseph Hatfield (the Rev War vet) and this George Hatfield, though the claim has often been repeated. Family researchers have been working on this for at least 60 years, but nothing has been found. There's also no documentation to the idea that George's middle name was "Goff" -- or that he even had a middle name, which were not common in the early 18th century.
posted by Michael Smith
HAtfield-250 and Hatfield-1477 appear to represent the same person because: same person, please merge in correct direction, name without two capital letters, please Hatfield-1477
posted by Robin Lee
Hatfield-1492 and Hatfield-1477 appear to represent the same person because: same dates, same family
posted by Robin Lee
Hatfield-1492 and Hatfield-1335 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse, same county
posted by Karen Lowe
Hatfield-1477 and Hatfield-1335 appear to represent the same person because: same spouse, same county
posted by Karen Lowe
HAtfield-250 and Hatfield-1335 appear to represent the same person because: same approximate dates, same spouse
posted by Karen Lowe

H  >  Hatfield  >  George Goff Hatfield Sr.

Categories: Virginia Colonists | Kentucky Appalachians | Native American Adjunct