| Mary (Kennion) Atherton migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
NOTE: The LNAB of Humphrey Atherton's wife Mary has been disputed. Her correct name is Mary Kennion/Kenion NOT Mary Wales (see research notes, below).
Contents |
Mary Kenion was the daughter of James Kenion of Haydock, Lancaster, and she is named in his 1632 will, along with her husband Humphrey Atherton "of Winstanley", who was appointed executor of James' will.[1] Mary's date and place of birth are unknown and are estimated.
The original marriage records for Humphrey Atherton and Mary Kennion have been found in Winwick Parish Register, Lancashire, showing Humphrey of Wigan Parish and Mary Kennion of Winwick, (Winwick and Wigan are neighboring parishes), the marriage dated 29 March 1624/25.[2] Based on his 1607 baptismal record, we know that Humphrey lived in Wigan Parish. The actual entry in the register reads "Humphrey Atherton - Wigan Mary Kennion 'istius' [of this place, namely Winwick] March 29".[2]
Mary gave birth to three children while living in Lancaster: Jonathan (b. 1627), Elizabeth (b. 1628) and Isabel (b. 1630).
By 1635 or 1636, the Athertons and other Puritan families following the Rev. Richard Mathers "packed what they could, sold what they could not, and loaded their possessions on pack horses, the children riding in baskets slung across a horse. They traveled across the west of England, down the Severn valley to Bristol, and from there they took passage to America."[citation needed]
Many think the Atherton family of five sailed on the emigrant ship James, which left Bristol, England in 1635[3] (the James departed 23 May 1635, and arrived in Boston 17 August 1635).[citation needed] Others think they arrived in 1637.[4]
Before they left England, Mary's father, James Kenion, wrote his will dated 6 April 1632, in which he names Mary and her husband Humphrey Atherton of Winstanley as his son-in-law and also nominates him as Executor of his Will, written as follows:
James Kenion died and was buried at Winwick 13 March 1636,[6]after Humphrey and Mary had gone to Massachusetts, so Humphrey could not act as executor.
Mary's husband became quite prominent in civic and military affairs in Dorchester and in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. While Humphrey was busy with his official duties, Mary was busy having and raising her twelve children, nine of which were born in Massachusetts:
Humphrey Atherton died 17 September 1661 and he left an extensive estate on which administration was granted 27 September 1661.[4]
Mary died on 17 August 1672 in Dorchester and was buried in the Dorchester North Burying Ground.[citation needed] She left a will dated 21 February 1671. In it, she mentions daughters: Patience and Mary, daughters Mather, Swifte, Bird; sons Watching, Consider, Hope; and grandchildren Mary Walls, Mary Weeks, Elizabeth Throwbridge, Katherine Mather, Rest Swifte, and Thankfull Bird. The witnesses to her will were deposed 3 October 1672.[citation needed]
Humphrey Atherton's wife, Mary, is incorrectly called Mary "Wales" based on an interpretation of the will of Nathaniel Wales, Sr. In his will dated 20 June 1661, Nathaniel calls Humphrey Atherton "my Brother in Law" and appointed him as overseer of his will.[7]
The "brother-in-law" statement leaves many to incorrectly conclude that Humphrey married Mary Wales, the sister of Nathaniel and daughter of their father John. Yet the will of John Wales (d. 1610), the father of Nathaniel, mentions no daughter named Mary.
However, in this era, the term "in-law" simply signified any relationship established by marriage. Thus, the brother-in-law reference may have an entirely different interpretation. We know that Nathaniel Wales Jr. married Humphrey's Atherton's daughter Isabel. Thus, with the marriage of Nathaniel's son and Humphrey's daughter, the two men were jointly fathers-in-law and this relationship made them "brothers-in-law" which then had a broader meaning than what we use today. Unfortunately the misinterpretation of the term "brother-in-law" leading to the assumption that Humphrey's wife was Mary Wales, appears in many published sources and continues to be used incorrectly.
This matter is firmly settled by the original marriage records of Mary Kennion and Humphrey Atherton in the Winwick Parish Register showing Humphrey Atherton of Wigan Parish and Mary Kennion of Winwick were married 29 March 1624/25.
That Mary Kenion, not Mary Wales, was Humphrey Atherton's wife is further confirmed by the will of James Kenion of Haydock, Lancashire (Mary's father) which names his daughter Mary and Humphrey Atherton of Winstanley as his son-in-law and nominates him as Executor of his Will.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Mary is 10 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 19 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 9 degrees from George Catlin, 13 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 21 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 11 degrees from George Grinnell, 21 degrees from Anton Kröller, 8 degrees from Stephen Mather, 21 degrees from Kara McKean, 14 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 23 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
K > Kennion | A > Atherton > Mary (Kennion) Atherton
Categories: Puritan Great Migration Project Needs Inline Citations | Puritan Great Migration | Atherton Name Study
If the PMs are not able to add citations, I will eventually re-do the research. However, I'd prefer not to spend my time redoing the work of others if at all possible. ;-)
Thanks! Traci
I could re-do your research, but that seems like a waste of my time since you've already done the research. Where do I find "Winwick Parish Register, Lancashire, March 29, 1624/25" so I can see the actual marriage record? Did you go to the parish and look at the actual book? Was the marriage recorded in another publication? If so, who was the author ... what was the title of the book ... when/where was it published ... what's the page #? Did you find the marriage record online? If so, what website? If it's online, could you please add a link to the record? etc., etc.
Basically, more detail is needed. For those of us who didn't actually see that parish record, we want to be able to verify it. On WikiTree, we cite sources.
See references 4-6 above. Those citations are in the proper format. Pre-1700 profiles have strict sourcing requirements and should follow source style guidelines. PGM can direct you to their project-specific guidelines or see general pre-1700 guideleines here: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Pre-1700_Profiles
There are multiple interpretations for the "brother-in-law" (to Wales) designation, but there doesn't seem to be enough support to identify her maiden name as Wales.