no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Palmer (abt. 1581 - 1637)

William Palmer
Born about in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1606 in Englandmap
Husband of — married about 1636 in Plymouth, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 56 in Duxbury, Plymouth, Massachusettsmap
Profile last modified | Created 27 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 13,471 times.
There are disproven, disputed, or competing theories about this person's parents. See the text for details.
There are disproven, disputed, or competing theories about this person's spouse. See the text for details.
The Puritan Great Migration.
William Palmer migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See Great Migration Begins, by R. C. Anderson, Vol. 3, p. 1383)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Biography

Clues to possible origins

In 2013, in Caleb Johnson's article entitled "Possible Clues to the English Origins of Fortune Passenger William Palmer" he shares research showing that William Palmer was perhaps the son of William Palmer, Sr., and his wife Alice Knight, baptized at Upper Clatford, Hampshire, England, August 13, 1581. This was the same parish in which Stephen Hopkins's baptism entry is found three baptismal entries before William's. The connection is further supported by Johnson's research in which he quotes a letter written by Plymouth Colony Governor, William Bradford, and his assistant Isaac Allerton, dated September 8,1623, referring to Stephen Hopkins' brother providing nails to be used in Plymouth Colony. William Palmer was the only known nailer in Plymouth Colony, and was perhaps a brother-in-law to Bradford.[1]

In the letter mentioned above, Bradford wrote, "...we have had of his brother here...", which suggests that Hopkins' "brother" was in Plymouth in 1623. In 1627, William Palmer and his wife Frances are included within Stephen Hopkins' household. Despite doing further research, Caleb could not find an obvious connection between the Stephen Hopkins and William Palmer families such that the specific nature of their "brotherhood" could be determined. Johnson offers several ideas, and suggests that a clue may be related to the will of Alice Palmer of Wherwell (which borders Upper Clatford), dated February 21, 1624-5 in which she mentions her son Stephen Palmer (Stephen being an uncommon first name), and a small debt to Henry Hopkins.[1]

Johnson acknowledges Anderson's work in The Great Migration Begins, in which Anderson estimated that Palmer was born by 1581; the baptism entry Caleb found fits with Anderson's estimate.[1] Perhaps more research will uncover additional information.

According to Anderson in The Great Migration Begins ..., William Palmer was born c. 1581, based on the estimated date of his first marriage. His origin is unknown,[2] but may have been England.[3]

Family

William married at least twice (possibly was an earlier marriage).[3] His two marriages, according to Anderson were: 1) Frances Unknown, about 1606; she died before 1637; and 2) Mary Unknown[2] William married Frances in England. She was probably the mother of William, Jr., according to Barclay,[3] and Frances was the mother of William, Jr., according to Anderson.[2] We know by William's will that two, or possibly three, older children remained in England when the family emigrated.[3] Frances may have been the mother of these children, also, according to Barclay,[3] and Frances was the mother, according to Anderson.[2]

Children:

  1. Henry Palmer; remained in England is suggested by William(1)'s will which makes a bequest "if he still be living." He was NOT the Henry Palmer of Wethersfield, CT.
  2. Bridget Palmer; remained in England is suggested by William(1)'s will which makes a bequest "if she still be living." That these two remained in England suggests (but does not prove) they were by a previous wife.
  3. Daughter Palmer (aka Sarah) (without citation), m. Henry Rowley; had at least one child, Moses, mentioned as "Moyses Rowley" in William(1)'s will and is considered a grandson. She died before 17 Oct 1633 when widowed Henry Rowley married Ann Blossom, widow of Thomas.
  4. (possibly) William Palmer Jr. (1) b by 1612 (based on date of freemanship). He might have been by the first wife because he came with his father, and not on the next ship with William(1)'s second wife, Frances. In either case, his parentage is unknown. He m. as "William Palmer Jr" in Plymouth 27 Mar 1634 Elisabeth Hodgkins. William died bef 1638; his widow m bef 2 Feb 1637/9 John Willis, as shown by records in connection with the estate of William Palmer Sr. William Jr and Elizabeth (Hodgkins) Palmer had one child:
    1. Rebecca, b 1635-6, called “my grandchild” in the will; living early in 1651/2 when she must have been about 15—on this date her stepfather complained that she had been molested and hindered in performing faithful service unto her master, Samuel Mayo of Barnstable by the wife of Trustrum Hull of Barnstable; No further record.

William married, by 1637, probably in Plymouth, to "a young woman," Mary Unknown (who was expecting when William wrote his will). Mary married c. 1644-6, second, and as his second, to Robert Paddock; and on 24 March 1650/1, third, Thomas Roberts. Child born posthumously to William Palmer Sr.:

  1. William Palmer Jr (2), b 27 Jun 1638 (Barclay claims a transcription error on the part of the Plymouth Colony record transcribers, who said 1634; this error is the source of misconceptions that this William was son of the first William Palmer Jr., but Barclay's article points out that impossibility.) He claimed his inheritance at age 21 on 29 Apr 1659. He was a cooper. He m abt 1662 Susanna ______, parents not found. That they had children, underage at the time of Palmer’s death is reflected in his inventory. He died in Dartmouth, MA 1675; inventory of his estate 30 Jun 1675; no will. No record of his widow, no birth records of their children, but Barclay makes the case for these children:
    1. (eldest:) William Palmer (III), b abt 1663; m abt 1685 Mary Richmond, dau of Edward of Little Compton; 12 children. In a 1683 deed, William sells land that “did formerly belong to William Palmer, of said Darthmouth deceased.” Richmond Genealogy claims this William (married to Mary Richmond) was son of Henry Palmer, but gives no proof.
    2. John Palmer, also of Little Compton who married a sister of Mary Richmond.

Migration

William sailed in 1621 aboard the Fortune.[2] He was likely of the London (not Leiden) group of Pilgrims.[citation needed] Palmer suggests he was initially on the Speedwell, and returned to London after that ship faltered, coming the next year on the Fortune with his son, William, age 8.[4] [QUESTION: Is William's age actually listed on the passenger list?] His first wife, Frances, arrived a little later, in 1623, aboard the Anne.[2]

The family settled at Plymouth where William worked as a "nailer."[2] His inventory included a bellows, an anvil, a vice, the tools of nail-making.[2] In 1623, William and Frances received two and one acres, respectively, as their shares of the Plymouth land division.[2] In the 1627 division of cattle, William, Frances, and William, Jr. are 8th, 9th, and 10th on the seventh company list.[2] William was taxed £1 7s in 1633, and 18s in 1634; William and his son, William, are both on the freeman list of 1633.[2][3]

He received a two-acre grant as a passenger on that ship - one acre for his servant William Carvanyell and one for himself. His son William also accompanied him in the Fortune, but was not yet 10 at the time of the land grants.321 His wife Frances followed on the Anne and received one acre, indicating she was not accompanied by any children over the age of 10. [citation needed]

Last Will & Testament

Will, dated 7 November 1637 and proved 4 December 1637:

William Palmer of Ducksborrow, nailer, being ill in body" named "my loving friends Mr. William Bradford, Mr. Edward Winslowe and Mr. Thomas Prence my executors"; "whereas I have married a young woman who is dear unto me I desire them to deal well with her but my desire is that my estate consisting of land, household goods, ... may be sold and turned into money all except such moveables as my executors think meet to give her for her personal comfort. Next my estate being wholly sold my desire is that my wife may not have less than one third and if she be with child then another third to be preserved and improved by my executors for that child as mine heir and that if in case she be not with child, then I would have mine executors as in conscience they are persuaded out of the remainder of my estate deal with Rebecca my grandchild and Moyses Rowley whom I love, but not so as to put into their father or mother's hands but preserve it for them till they come to years of discretion"; "somewhat to Stephen Tracy"; "somewhat towards the meeting house at Plymouth"; "young Rowley to be placed with Mr. Partridge that he might be brought up in the fear of God and to that end if his father suffer it I give to Mr. Patridge £5"; "in case my son Henry or daughter Bridgett be living, if they demand it, I give them 40s. apiece if they be living." Further "it was the will of the testator that his wife should be ruled by her ancient Mr. Edward Winslow in her marriage if she look to partake in any part of this estate, otherwise not" [MD 2:147-48, citing PCPR 1:28].[5][6]
The inventory of "all the moveable goods of Will[ia]m Palm[e]r the elder, taken 13 November 1637, totaled £111 12s. 4d. [MD 2:148-52, citing PCPR 1:28-29].[5][6]

Born by about 1581, based on estimated date of first marriage. Nailer who came to Massachusetts Bay in 1621on the "Fortune." First settled in Plymouth, then moved to Duxbury. Died in Duxbury between 7 November 1637 (data of will) 13 November 1637 (date of inventory). On 2 January 1637/8 Mr. Hopkins was presented for allowing excessive drinking in his house. "Old Palmer " was one of the men said to have been drunk there, and Widow Palmer an Widow Palmer's man were two of the witnesses, suggesting that the Widow may have blamed mr. Hopkins for allowing her husband to drink too much. Married: (1) By about 1606 n 1623 and had died by 1637. (2) By 1637 Mary_____; she married (2) by 20 October 1646 Robert Paddock; she married (3) Plymouth 24 March 1650/1Thomas Roberts.

Research Notes

Disputes as to origin, birth and parentage, etc. Misinformation about this man is spread across the Internet. There are many claims that have no documented source. They include:

  1. That William (1) Palmer Sr of Plymouth and Duxbury was son of John Palmer and Elizabeth Verney born 1585. Closer examination of that record (per research commissioned by Carlton J. Palmer, Jr.) indicates their son William DIED on that date.[4] See also The Colonial Genealogist, XII:3, page 115. Therefore, we are removing William(1) Palmer Sr of Plymouth/Duxbury from said parents and associated siblings.
  2. Unsourced born 07 Feb 1582 Stepney, Middlesex, England
  3. He was NOT the William Palmer who moved to Newtown, LI in 1656; wife Judith Peake, dau of James Peake of London. This was a different family.
  4. That the first wife of William(1) Palmer Sr was Rebecca (______). There appears no documentation of this name. (It is believed he likely had an earlier wife, but her name has not been documented.)
  5. That by this first wife, he had a daughter Sarah who married Henry Rowley. That he had a daughter who married Henry Rowley and had at least one child, Moses, is strongly suggested by William(1) Palmer's will. But that her name is Sarah, while claimed by a 1988 genealogy,[4] the author of that work provides no documentation of a) such a child so named, or b) of a marriage between a Sarah Palmer and Henry Rowley. Anderson (GMB) names her only "Daughter" and we should go with that. Perhaps research into Henry Rowley might shed greater light. For now, we are changing her name to Unknown with an "aka" of Sarah.
    1. That this daughter, with Henry Rowley, had a daughter Sarah Rowley who married Jonathan Hatch. Henry Rowley did likely have such a daughter, but she was likely from his first marriage. If she'd been granddaughter of William(1) Palmer, Sr., she would have been named in his will, since he mentioned other grandchildren.
  6. That his second wife, and she who followed him to New England, was Frances Bottom, dau of Thomas. Her first name is known, but that she was daughter of Thomas is only conjecture based on similarity of given names in each family, and supposition that she was named after her father's brother Francis. Anderson was not willing to go with the "Bottom" surname and lists her as Frances _____. We should, too, including conjectures in her narrative.
  7. That William(1) Palmer Sr.'s third wife was Mary Trine, a maidservant of his who as a child came over on the same ship as he did. Carlton Palmer admits "Trine" may have been reference to her being his third wife. But again, no documentation exists that his third wife's surname was Trine. That her first name was Mary is concluded from Barclay's excellent article. Therefore, we should call her Mary _____ (as does Anderson), and explain the conjecture and lack of evidence in her narrative.
  8. That he had a son Henry who married in Watertown Nov 1635 Katherine. a) there is no such Watertown marriage; b) William had a son Henry, mentioned in his will, but the language implies this son remained in England.
  9. That he had a daughter Joan Palmer Maunder, bapt 5 Jan 1608 in Okehampton, Devon, England. There apparently is such a baptism for a daughter Johanna to a father William Palmer,[7] but no evidence that it was this William.

Carlton Palmer Jr's work, referenced above, has some good information in it, but much is not cited.[4] Where he cites his work, it appears solid. Otherwise, I don't see how we can go with his claims without additional confirmation. (For example, he suggests strongly-- although admits its not proven-- that the emigrant William Palmer was son of another William Palmer in London, mariner, will dated 13 Apr 1602. (Anderson in GMB does not go with Carlton Palmer.)

In 1956 Florence Barclay produced the definitive article on William Palmer, resolving many of the outstanding problems, outlining the careers of the two sons of the immigrant named William, and pointing out several errors in Savage, particularly the mixing of William (b. 1612) with the man who went to Newtown, Long Island [TAG 32:39-45]... Carlton A. Palmer, Jr., has published several articles attempting to outline the three Williams and their wives and arriving at conclusions contrary to those of Florence Barclay [The Augustan Society Omnibus 9:101-103, 107; MQ 50:188-90]. Unfortunately, his misunderstanding of the meaning of "son-in-law" undermines his own arguments."[3]

This would seem to indicate we should go with Barclay's findings.

I've read Barclay's article; it's solid; Carlton Palmer Jr's work provides SOME additional information, but most is unsourced. I therefore suggest we go with the following for this profile: Jillaine Smith

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Johnson, Caleb, "Possible Clues to the English Origins of Fortune Passenger William Palmer" Mayflower Descendant: A Journal of Pilgrim Genealogy and History. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants, 1899- . (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010) Reference Volume 62 (2013), pages 66-68 via $American Ancestors
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Anderson, Robert Charles, William Palmer The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III. Pages 1383-86 (Online database accessed January 17, 2015: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Barclay, Florence Harlow, "Notes on the Palmer Family of Plymouth," The American Genealogist. (Vol 32 (1955) Pgs 39-45) New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus, 1937-. (Online database accessed January 17, 2015. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009 - .)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Palmer, Carlton A., The Ancient Family of Palmer of Plymouth Colony. self-published, 1988. (Online at familysearch.org. accessed January 17, 2015 (Caution: mix of sourced and non-sourced data. Many undocumented assertions.)
  5. 5.0 5.1 "Plymouth Colony Wills and Inventories." The Mayflower Descendant: A Magazine of Pilgrim Genealogy and History. (Vol 2 Pages 147-52) Boston, MA: Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants, 1899- . (Online database accessed January 17, 2015: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010)
  6. 6.0 6.1 "Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Records, 1633-1967," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G97D-V3H7  : 5 March 2023), Wills 1633-1686 vol 1-4 > image 38 of 616; State Archives, Boston. Page 28-30
  7. England, Select Birth & Christenings (Ancestry.com database), citing FHL 917210

See also:

  • Walmer, Horace W., Palmer Families in America, vol. III (1973). "This family line is descended from Captain John Palmer of Little Compton, Rhode Island, grandson of William Palmer, Pilgrim of 1621."
  • For historical context: History of Cape Cod, By Frederick Freeman, pg. 173 - 189
  • Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/40117821/william-palmer : accessed 06 October 2021), memorial page for William Palmer Sr. (18 Mar 1580–9 Nov 1637), Find a Grave Memorial ID 40117821, citing Mayflower Cemetery, Duxbury, Plymouth County, Massachusetts, USA ; Maintained by goatesnotes (contributor 47866029) .




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of William's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 27

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony were a distinct group of separatists, followers of Pastor John Robinson, of Lincolnshire. The congregation Robinson formed would gather for services at the mansion of William Brewster, in the nearby hamlet of Scrooby, Nottinghamshire, near where Nottinghamshire, Yorkshire and Lincolnshire meet. The area was part of the parish of Howden, in South Yorkshire. Pastor Robinson's congregation eventually chose to leave England, for Holland, and eventually would sail on the Mayflower to the New World and establish the Plymouth Colony.

The birth of William Palmer, to Johis Palmer, in Waterside, South Yorkshire, is recorded in the Howden parish records, 12 August, 1582. The village of Waterside is only 14 miles from the town of Scrooby, the gathering place of the original Mayflower Pilgrims who would leave England for Holland beginning in 1608. William Palmer married, on 16 Oct 1613, in the parish minster at Howden, a woman named Frances Wallis. Knowing that the wife of William Palmer of the Plymouth Colony was named Francis, confirms that this William Palmer, born in Waterside Yorkshire, so close to Scrooby, who married Francis Wallis, is almost certainly the Pilgrim William Palmer of Plymouth, and his wife Francis. We might also note that William Palmer named a daughter Bridgitt. The wife of the Pilgrim leader John Robinson was Bridgitt.

The original group of Scrooby emigres left for Amsterdam, starting in 1608, moving in small groups, then, in 1609, moving on to Leiden, Holland, where the congregation settled.

William and Frances apparently followed the Scrooby congregation to Holland, sometime after their 1613 marriage, embarking from there for Plymouth in 1621 and 1623. Their presence in Leiden is supported by the bequest, in William's will, to Stephen Tracy of Plymouth, documented as having been with the Pilgrims in Leyden. Presumably Stephen was close to the family in Leiden, and may have been a support to Frances during William's absence between 1621 and 1623, William (and his son William) having left on the second ship to sail for Plymouth, the Fortune, which sailed from London in early July 1621. Francis, and Stephen Tracy, followed in 1623, in the Anne.

William was apparently married, at least once, before his marriage to Frances Wallis. His will mentions bequests to his two children, Henry and Bridgitt "...if they be liveing." To have been left behind when William and Frances emigrated to America, they must have been older, too old to have been born after William and Frances' 1613 marriage. If they were children of Frances, they would have been at most 9 years in 1621, and likely would have accompanied Frances when she arrived in Plymouth in 1623. Additionally, William's son William J., who sailed with William Sr on the Fortune, was also too old to have been a son of Francis. He was aged 21 by 1633, when he is documented as a Freeman of Plymouth, therefore, William Jr had to have been born no later than 1612, which would imply a marriage before 1611, and before William's 1613 marriage to Frances.

It may be that William's previous wife had died shortly after William Jr's birth, and shortly before William's marriage to Francis.

There were three other marriages involving a William Palmer, in the area around South Yorkshire, between 1596 and 1608. A William Palmer married Margret Elebye in Nov 1596, at Selby Abbey, Yorkshire - 5 miles from Howden, and 12 miles from Waterside. Another marriage was to Helein Sanderson, at St Martin le Grand, in the city of York, on 30 August 1601, 17 miles from Howden, 24 miles from Waterside. And another, to Elizabetha Pagett, on 3 July 1608, at Darrington, 16 miles from Howden, and 12 miles from Waterside. Any could have been a marriage to William who married Frances in 1613. The comment from William's will "if they be living," suggests that perhaps Henry and Bridgitt were beyond their teens, when William sailed for America, making it less likely that Elizabetha Pagett, of the 1608 marriage, was the mother of Henry and Bridgitt, as well as William's unknown daughter who married Henry Rowley; that unknown daughter did not accompany William or Francis to Plymouth, indicating that she was already married, and older than her brother William Jr, when William and his son William Jr. sailed for Plymouth.

The marriage to Margret Elebye in 1596, when William was 14, would be possible, but completing an apprenticeship at that young age, though, even in the less-skilled trades, and being established enough to immediately marry, would be uncommon.

The August 1601 marriage to Helein Sanderson would seem more likely, as William's older children, Henry and Bridgitt, would still have been old enough to have been apprenticed at the more typical ages of 12 to 14, or to have been married, before William sailed for America in 1621. She could also have been the parent of both William Jr and William's unknown daughter who married Henry Rowley. Also, a Henry Sanderson was born 14 June 1562, in Doddington, Lincolnshire, about 20 miles from Scrooby, both old enough to have been the father of Helein and with the right name to have been the namesake for William Palmer's first son - Henry. It's worth noting, though, that Elizabetha Padgett, of the 1608 marriage, could easily have been the mother to the youngest child, William Jr, as a 2nd wife to William Sr (thus making Francis William's 3rd wife).

William was granted 2 acres during the 1623 land allotment for those on the Fortune, indicating that his son William Jr. must have accompanied him; William's wife Frances received 1 acre during the drawing for those on the Anne.

William Sr. had another daughter who married Henry Rowley; we don't know her name. He left a bequest to his grandson Moses Rowley in his will, but he did not mention Moses' mother, who must have died before the will was written. She did not accompany William or Francis on the voyage to Plymouth. She must have married Henry Rowley in either Leiden, or perhaps even before William and Francis emigrated from England to Leiden. We know Moses must have been born by about 1630, so his mother must have been born by about 1610 at the latest. The average age for women to marry in Puritan society at the time was about 23 years old, so she would have been born probably about 1605 to 1610. She could have been the daughter of either Helein Sanderson or Elizabetha Pagett.

William and his family removed to Duxbury after 1633 along with Myles Standish, John Allen, Jonathan Brewster, Love Brewster, William Bassett, Steven Tracy, William Sprague and others.

William Jr died before the 1637 death of his father. He died sometime between 1 Jan. 1635, when he was admitted as a freeman in Plymouth Colony, and the 25 Aug 1636 inventory of his estate. His widow, Elizabeth, remarried to Deacon John Willis of Duxbury. Elizabeth and her 2nd husband John Willis later sued William Sr's estate, claiming interest in a property owed to Elizabeth by right of her marriage to William.

It's not known when William's wife Francis died, but it was probably in the mid-1630's. By the time William wrote his 7 Nov 1637 will, William was remarried to a younger wife, Mary, whom he suspected, and who indeed was, pregnant; "...whereas I have marryed a yeong woman who is deare unto me... my desire is that my wife my not have lesse than one third then if in case shee be wth child as myne heire." William died shortly after writing his will - the inventory was taken 13 Nov 1637, 6 days later - Mary delivered their son 27 Jun 1638, in Duxbury, after his death. She named their son William, thus giving William Sr. two sons named William, a practice not uncommon at the time, when an earlier child died.

posted by Ken Green
Hi Ken,

Thank you for your work on considerable post. Might this effort be best advanced on a linked WikiTree Free Space Page, where you and others could collaborate to provide sources and inline citations? Such work might form the basis for an array of G2G questions, so the effort could engage an even broader audience. --Gene

posted by GeneJ X
Thanks Gene! I'd be very happy to do all of that, but as a relative novice to WikiTree I have no idea of how exactly to do any of that. I've looked around and I think I have an idea, but I fear if I just jump in I'm going to make a hash of it. Could you please private message me with some instructions - how to set up a linked WikiTree Free Space Page - or better, email me at [email address removed] Thanks. I actually have more that I can add - just didn't have room in my post above.
posted by Ken Green
I will help after work. --Gene
posted by GeneJ X
Caleb Johnson reports in his book about Mayflower passenger Stephen Hopkins (https://www.amazon.com/Here-Shall-Die-Ashore-Jamestown/dp/1425796338), that William Palmer was the son of William and Alice (Knight) Palmer and was baptized parish church of All Saints, Upper Clatford, on 13 August, 1581. Stephen Hopkins was baptized in the same church in the same year. Caleb Johnson further reports that William Palmer was a passenger on the Fortune and shared a house with Stephen Hopkins in the Plymouth Colony.
posted by Bruce Jenks
Thank you for supporting WikiTree and for your interest in William Palmer.

I do not have Johnson's book, but Johnson also wrote, "Possible Clues to the English Origins of Fortune Passenger William Palmer," The Mayflower Descendant, 62 (2013):66-; digital images by subscription, AmericanAncestors.

From p. 67, citing Upper Clatford parish registers for, "William the son of William Palmer [baptized] the 13th day of August [1581]."

Johnson associates the father was "William Palmer [Sr.] married Alice Knight on 2 October 1580 at Upper Clatford, Hampshire." Further claiming there are two other children baptized of this William [Sr.]--Robert in 1583/4 and Rose, 1587.

It's possible I missed something in my brief review of the 2013 article, but it sounded to me as though the immigrant's association as son of William and Alice was promising, perhaps even probably, but still lacking related documents to prove the son was the immigrant. Ala, finding a connection that would explain "why Stephen Hopkins considered William Palmer to be his brother.

In the final paragraph or so, Johnson mentions one or more clues in the records that, with further digging, might provide and answer and thus the needed proof.

Others might approach this differently, I would suggest ...

(1) If there are not already entries on WikiTree for the possible parents (I didn't find them), they could/should be added to the database. There seem to be enough information in the 2013 article to support profiles for both. likewise for the two other children baptized, Robert and Rose.

(2) Profile of the immigrant, William Palmer, is lacking a section for Research Notes (generally just before Sources). A note could be added to that new section, Possible Parents referencing the material in MD 2013 article (perhaps there is more in the book that should be added also), and links between the profiles could be made there.

Would you be comfortable undertaking this work?

Thank you again for supporting WikiTree.--Gene

Edited to add: I see Sharon has added a research maintenance category. Would you be willing to take it from there, Bruce?

posted by GeneJ X
edited by GeneJ X
(Like ships in the night.....) I added some of the Johnson TAG information to this profile, and changed the name of a heading to "Clues to possible origins". I second your suggestions for adding his likely parents and siblings.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Palmer-19245 and Palmer-345 appear to represent the same person because: Same death date, all information cited is unsupported ancestry trees. The records in ancestry all refer to the second marriage to Frances (with an unsupported surname Blossom). No reason to keep as a separate profile.
posted by E. Logan
It appears his wife Francis is under profile Blossom-75 and these two should be linked. Once again, I am not pre-1700 certified. Could someone help to update these things?
posted on Palmer-19245 (merged) by Sarah (Schleicher) Sterling
I detached Mary Stamforth as a wife of this William Palmer. I also separated Christopher Palmer [Palmer-789] as being a son of this William Palmer. Christopher Palmer is an early presence in Hampton, New Hampshire. His marriage to a Hilton would indicate that he was in the Kittery/Portsmouth area at tim of mrriage.
posted by Thomas Moody
I do not understand this profile, you have all the records for the man that married Frances Blossom, yet you show him married to Mary Palmer.
posted on Palmer-19245 (merged) by Robin Lee
I have been looking at this profile and according to New England, The Great Migration and The Great Migration Begins, 1620-1635, he was married twice. So that is why there are both women listed in this profile. Whoever established this profile didn't make that clear. I am not pre-1700 certified, so I cannot update it. Maybe someone who is can??

The first marriage occurred in England approx. 1606 and was to Frances (Blossom?). She preceded him in death in either 1636 or 1637 (unsure which because of how they did years back then). He then married Mary, who was much younger than him as stated in his will and he ended up dying in November of 1637. She got remarried to a Robert Paddock by Oct of 1646.

The following Wikipedia page has some information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passengers_of_1621_Fortune_voyage William Palmer – He was one of the older passengers, born in 1581. He was a nailer by profession. He came without his family and received one acre in the 1623 land division. Member of the 1626 Purchase investment group as “Willm. Palmer.” His family came over on the Anne in 1623 and his wife Frances received one acre in the 1623 land division as an Anne passenger under “ffrance wife to Wit Palmer.” In 1627 his wife Frances and son William shared in the division of cattle list as “William Pallmer,” wife “ffrances” and son “Willm Pallmer Jnor.” He died in Duxbury, November, 1637.[26]

posted on Palmer-19245 (merged) by Sarah (Schleicher) Sterling
The other William Palmer-15080 has a Henry Attached who is not wm's on. I've left a message on Henry re disconnecting
posted by Anne B
Palmer-15080 and Palmer-345 appear to represent the same person because: Same death data, and matching son Henry. I think that Palmer-15080 is intended to represent the man who emigrated to New England, who is represented in WikiTree by Palmer-345.
posted by Ellen Smith
Palmer-8493 and Palmer-345 appear to represent the same person because: Died between 7 NOv and 4 Dec 1637.
posted by Anne B
Children checked. The two dying in England are those mentioned in his will as "if still living" which Anderson has interpreted to indicate they remained in England. Two others detached.
posted by Jillaine Smith
If there are no clear English records for this person I suppose it is not possible that any of the children attached to him should bevrecorded as living and dieing in England? Seems to need checking.
posted by Andrew Lancaster
Go with Anderson. Merge her away into one of the other wives.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Cleaned up, following guidelines in "Uncertain Origin" (I hope). Question: Is the wife named "Unknown Unknown" staying? The two sources considered reliable, Anderson and Barclay, seem to disagree about her. However, Anderson does not mention her.
posted by Cynthia (Billups) B
Palmer-7920 and Palmer-345 are not ready to be merged because: Personally I'd like to see Palmer-345 cleaned up a bit before a merge is considered.
posted by [Living Sylvester]
Palmer-7920 and Palmer-345 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, birth date is probably a guess, and the death date and place are the same.

Please approve if you agree these represent the same person.

Thanks!

posted by Cynthia (Billups) B