Margaret Plantagenet was an illegitimate daughter of Edward IV of England.[1]Most secondary sources incorrectly call her Elizabeth. She married Thomas Lumley, esq., son and heir apparent of Sir George Lumley, Lord Lumley of Lumley, co. Durham. Together they had four sons and three daughters.
Identity
Almost all secondary sources call the wife of Thomas Lumley "Elizabeth." This even includes recent references such as Royal Ancestry (2013),[2] and Wikipedia.[3][4]
Visitations and pedigrees refer to her as the natural daughter of King Edward IV.[5]
While she is usually unnamed; she is sometimes incorrectly referred to as "Elizabeth." Support for this comes from a papal dispensation issued for the marriage of her son Richard Lumley to Anne Conyers, who were related in the 4th degree (both would have been descendants Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmoreland).
Near-contemporary sources do not actually give her name. They simply state she married Thomas Lumley and was a natural daughter of Edward IV. However, posts on SGM, show that her name was Margaret.[1]
Proof comes from a fine where Thomas Lumley and Margaret his wife conveyed land to their son.[6]
In 1485 she was also called Margaret in the IPM of her husband's grandfather, another Thomas Lumley.[7]
Parents
While Margaret's father is known, the identity of her mother has long been a mystery. Some have argued that she was Edward's mistress Elizabeth Lucy a.k.a. Wayte.[3][8]
Marriage and Children
By 1477 Margaret married Sir Thomas Lumley, Esq. of Beautrove, co. Durham.[9][3]
↑ 1.01.1 Richardson, Douglas, et al. C.P. Correction/Addition: Thomas Lumley, Esquire (died 1502-3), and his wife, Margaret Plantagenet. (Soc.genealogy.medieval Discussion Group, first post 29 October 2013). SGM Google Groups Link.
↑ Richardson, D. (2013). Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5, p. 468-469. Salt Lake City, UT.
↑ 3.03.1incorrectly calls her Elizabeth instead of Margaret
↑ Longstaffe, W. Hylton Dyer ed.Visitation of the Northern Counties in 1530 by Thomas Tonge. (Surtees Soc. 41, 1862): page 27.
Norcliffe, Charles Best ed. Visitation of Yorkshire in the years 1563 and 1564, (London: Harleian Society Visitation Series, vol. 16, 1881): pages 189-190.
↑ Great Britain PRO. Annual Report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, vol. 35. (London, 1874): page 134.
↑ Great Britain PRO. Annual Report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records, vol 44. (London, 1883): page 451.
↑ Weir, A. (2008). Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy. London: Vintage Books. eBook.
Weir (2008), states that Elizabeth might be the wife of Thos. Lumley. The author is not absolutely certain.
↑ Wallis, J. (1769). The Natural History and Antiquities of Northumberland: And of So Much of the County of Durham A Lies Between the Rivers Tyne and Tweed, Commonly Called North Bishoprick, II, pp.330. N.p. Google Books. Web. 16 Jan. 2014.
↑ 11.011.111.211.3 Owen, W. (1790). The Peerage of England, Scotland, and Ireland: The peerage of England, p. 212. Google eBook.
↑ Burke, J. (1831). A General and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerages of England, Ireland, and Scotland, Extinct, Dormant, and in Abeyance ... England. London: H. Colburn & R. Bentley. Google Books. Web. 12 Jan. 2014.
↑CAUTION: Collins (1768), states she m. Ralph. But he was 3rd Baron Ogle who m. Margaret Gascoigne
Collins, A. (1768). The Peerage of England; Containing a Genealogical and Historical Account of All the Peers of that Kingdom Etc. (4th ed. pp.107). London: H. Woodfall. Google eBook.
↑ Bindoff (1982), calls him the de jure 9th baron, while Lewis (2004), simply names him the 9th baron.[1] A Wikipedia list, dating his death to c. 1535, calls him the de jure 8th baron, but the citations are poor.[2]
↑ alias: Eleanor (Elianor) m. ___ Creswell of Creswell, NBL
See Also...
Flower, William. Pedigrees recorded at the visitations of the county palatine of Durham. 1887. Pg. 216. Archive.org. [4]
Hutchinson, William. The history and antiquities of the county palatine of Durham. 1823. Vol 2. Pg. 500-1. Archive.org. [5]
Doubleday, H. A. The Complete Peerage Vol-vii. 1929. Pg. 30. Archive.org. [6]
Milner, Edith. Records of the Lumleys of Lumley Castle. 1904. Pg. 381. Archive.org. [7]
Tonge, Thomas. Heraldic visitation of the northern counties in 1530. 1863. Pg. 27. Archive.org. [8]
Lysons, Daniel. The environs of London. 1792. Vol 1. Pg. 143. Archive.org. [9]
Flaherty, William Edward. The annals of England. 1862. Vol 2. Pg. 76. Archive.org. [10]
Amherst, William. A hand-list of a collection of books and manuscripts. 1906. Pg. 101. Archive.org. [11]
Is Margaret your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Plantagenet-1754 and Plantagenet-1721 appear to represent the same person because: Based on father's and husband's and daughter's names and other ancestors and descendants, these two profiles are intended to be the same person and must be merged according to WikiTree policy. Please disregard the death date of about 1700 as this is definitely incorrect. Also she was an illegitimate daughter of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville is not her mother.
Forgot to add that although Elizabeth has often been assumed to be her given name, sources as cited on Plantagenet-1721 prove that it is in fact Margaret.
Thomas Lumley and Margaret his wife are also mentioned in the Durham IPM of his grandfather Sir Thomas Lumley, Knt., 2nd Lord Lumley, who died 1 April 1485. An abstract of the IPM was published in the 44th Annual Report, pp. 451-452
Hi Bree, her given name was actually Margaret, not Elizabeth. This is proven by a contemporary license recorded on Membrane 8 of Roll 1 of William Dudley, Bishop of Durham. An abstract of this record was published many years ago in Annual Report of the Deputy Keeper 35 (1874): 134.
WikiTree's naming system for English kings tends to follow their House. ... So yes, this Elizabeth [Plantagenet] is an illegit. dau. of the Yorkist king, Edward IV. ... Her legit. sister Elizabeth of York, married Henry [Tudor] VII.
According to Wikipedia her father was actually Edward who was a king of England and her mother was one of his mistress, and not Edward York unless you mean York is another name for this king?
https://archive.org/details/annualreportdep06offigoog/page/n486
https://archive.org/details/ldpd_11897906_035/page/154
See also the soc.genealogy.medieval post by Douglas Richardson in 2013 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/soc.genealogy.medieval/7g__mErVKHs/SjdVE1i8Rm8J
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2013-10/1382377997
Controversy
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2013-10/1382822439