↑ Pratt-3272 was created by Kristin Peachey through the import of KLPeacheywiki2.ged on Jun 26, 2014. This comment and citation can be deleted after the biography has been edited and primary sources are included.
Source: S2868 Abbreviation: Ancestry Family Trees Title: Ancestry Family Trees (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.) Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created. Repository: #R14 Page: Ancestry Family Trees Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=19858511&pid=4953
Repository: R14 Name: Ancestry.com Address:
Is Benjamin your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Benjamin by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
I've edited his b. date to the more likely "aft. 1777" ... parents were m. Nov of that year.
It seems also that an adjustment wss needed for the m. of Benjamin & Olive, since the current date shown would have them both abt. 11 y.o. ... Their shown child, Sarah has a 1799 b. date, so I'm going to guess the m. date shown of 1788 was a typo and I've also edited that.
Hope you don't mind, I'm really not trying to step on toes, I just happen to be working this line.
Please don't hesitate to let me know if anything I've done seems incorrect.
I've edited his b. date to the more likely "aft. 1777" ... parents were m. Nov of that year.
It seems also that an adjustment wss needed for the m. of Benjamin & Olive, since the current date shown would have them both abt. 11 y.o. ... Their shown child, Sarah has a 1799 b. date, so I'm going to guess the m. date shown of 1788 was a typo and I've also edited that.
Hope you don't mind, I'm really not trying to step on toes, I just happen to be working this line.
Please don't hesitate to let me know if anything I've done seems incorrect.
Thanks, Dan