The maiden surname of Hannah, the second wife of Roger Billings of Dorchester, Massachusetts Bay, is not known; she is thought to have perhaps been born about 1625, an estimate based initially on her likely age at the time of their marriage – placed at about 1644 by Clarence Almon Torrey in his New England Marriages Prior to 1700[1].
Torrey's estimate was presumably based on the birth records of what he believed to be Roger and Hannah's earliest known children; later analysis, based on the spacing of the children, suggests that the marriage may have been as late as 1655[2]. A birth about 1625 nonetheless remains plausible given Roger's age. Hannah is assumed to have been admitted to the Dorchester church on the 14th of October, 1655[3] (though it has been suggested that this Hannah might have been a daughter rather than a wife; the record does not specify whether she was married at the time of her admission); she died at Dorchester in late May of 1662 – just days after giving birth to her last child, daughter Zipporah. Roger survived Hannah by two decades, and remarried.
The Marriages of Roger Billings
Roger Billings (1620-1683) probably married his first wife, Mary (maiden surname unknown), about 1640, based on the estimated birth date of the couple's first known child, Joseph, about 1641-42[2]. No record has been found to date (Apr. 2023) of the date or location of her death.
His marriage to the Hannah of this profile, his second wife (maiden surname again not known), could have occurred, as noted above, as early as 1644. It is however thought more likely to have taken place about 1655[2]. Hannah died on 25 May 1662, at Dorchester[4].
Roger's third marriage, to Elizabeth Pratt (1642-)[5] was likely within a year or two of the death of Hannah – say, late 1663 – and likely took place at Dorchester [6].
Offspring
Waldo Chamberlain Sprague's 2001 analysis of Roger's marriages and offspring assigned the children somewhat differently from earlier estimates: based on Sprague's belief that Hannah and Roger did not marry until about 1655, he believed Hannah to have been the mother of four children[2]:
Ebenezer, bp. 6 Jan. 1655/6 (the second son of that given name, the first having died)
Zipporah, b. 21 May. 1662 – four days before her mother's death.
Sources
↑ "BILLINGS, Roger1 (-1683, ae 65) & 2/wf Hannah ____ (-25 May 1662); ca 1644?; Dorchester {Deerfield 82; Thayer (1835) 67; Sv. 1:178; Dunham-Boyd 39; Reg. 9:152, 10:78, 92:261} " -- Vol. 1, p. 144, New England Marriages to 1700. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015; https://www.americanancestors.org/DB1568/i/21174/144/426877079 (by subscription)
The merged profile Savage-1958 was created 26 Dec 2013 by Michael Thomas.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Savage-1958 and Unknown-640118 represented the same person: Savage-1958 showed the Taunton, Somerset, birth location that traces its origin to the known fraud perpetrated by Horatio Gates Somerby. Please see the more extensive comment below, originally posted on Savage-1958 (and since edited), for a detailed explanation – with a link to the 1999 article in The American Genealogist that proved the fraud.
What we really know about Hannah (Unknown) Billings is minimal. Unknown-640118 correctly represents what we do know about the actual second wife of Roger Billings.
[Edited] The birth location that was shown in the now-merged profile Savage-1958 – Taunton, in Somerset – is the red flag that associated this identification of Roger Billings's wife as Hannah Savage with one of the infamous Somerby frauds... one that has bedeviled the family (and those trying to trace it) for a century or more.
The maiden surname of this second wife Hannah is not known. Even Torrey's exhaustively-researched New England Marriages does not speculate that it might have been Savage [see p. 144, New England Marriages to 1700. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015; https://www.americanancestors.org/DB1568/i/21174/144/426877079 (by subscription)]. Horatio Gates Somerby concocted a Somerset origin for Roger & family; that this origin was a fraud was formally proven by professional genealogist Paul C. Reed in 1999, writing in The American Genealogist. Those with a subscription to NEHGS can find Reed's definitive article at https://www.americanancestors.org/DB283/i/13222/28/0 [The American Genealogist. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus, 1937-. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009 - .)].
The former profile Savage-1958 has thus now been merged away into this profile of Hannah (Unknown) Billings.
I see a merge has been requested. Go ahead and proceed, if you can. Do I understand the only sticking point is the Taunton, Somerset reference and, if it was left out, all the other information would be correct in a merge?
There are some minor differences, but the key information is the same; see Roger's profile for details and sourcing. There is a question about the assignment of children to first wife Mary, vs. second wife Hannah: Waldo Chamberlain Sprague's 2001 Genealogies of the Families of Braintree, Mass. gives a son Joseph, born "near 1641-2", which would push the Roger-Mary marriage back to, say, about 1640. Sprague also evidently thinks the marriage to Hannah was close to the time of her admission to the Dorchester church in 1655; this notion is supported by the gap between the births of Samuel in late October of 1651, and Ebenezer in January of 1655/6. I have followed Sprague's suggestion (which had already been incorporated into one of the now-merged profiles of Roger) as his logic seems sound.
I think the estimated 1625 birth for Hannah remains defensible even with the marriage pushed up to about 1655. It's a reasonable marriage match with the wife about five years younger than the husband. And we know so little about Hannah that it's just possible she had a previous marriage, and was a widow when she married Roger.
BTW the merge does need formal approval from you or your co-PM for completion; the merge proposal notice you will presumably have received from WikiTree should indicate how to register that approval.
Double-check my merge. I left out the Taunton, Somerset reference, but the rest looked OK. If it should be needed, I can add it back in. Make sure the rest looks good to you. Thanks.
Based on the location/date of death, name of husband and son Roger (also duplicates in need of merging) -- these are clear duplicates. No source for Savage-7729 yet, so not sure where date/place of birth comes from. Note that 1594 birth date is unlikely, as she would have been 63 years old when son Roger was born; 1620 is more probable.
Savage-7729 and Savage-1958 appear to represent the same person because: Based on the location/date of death, name of husband and son Roger (also duplicates in need of merging) -- these are clear duplicates. No source for Savage-7729 yet, so not sure where date/place of birth comes from. Note that 1594 birth date is unlikely, as she would have been 63 years old when son Roger was born; 1620 is more probable.
What we really know about Hannah (Unknown) Billings is minimal. Unknown-640118 correctly represents what we do know about the actual second wife of Roger Billings.
edited by Christopher Childs
The maiden surname of this second wife Hannah is not known. Even Torrey's exhaustively-researched New England Marriages does not speculate that it might have been Savage [see p. 144, New England Marriages to 1700. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015; https://www.americanancestors.org/DB1568/i/21174/144/426877079 (by subscription)]. Horatio Gates Somerby concocted a Somerset origin for Roger & family; that this origin was a fraud was formally proven by professional genealogist Paul C. Reed in 1999, writing in The American Genealogist. Those with a subscription to NEHGS can find Reed's definitive article at https://www.americanancestors.org/DB283/i/13222/28/0 [The American Genealogist. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus, 1937-. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009 - .)].
The former profile Savage-1958 has thus now been merged away into this profile of Hannah (Unknown) Billings.
edited by Christopher Childs
I think the estimated 1625 birth for Hannah remains defensible even with the marriage pushed up to about 1655. It's a reasonable marriage match with the wife about five years younger than the husband. And we know so little about Hannah that it's just possible she had a previous marriage, and was a widow when she married Roger.
Based on the location/date of death, name of husband and son Roger (also duplicates in need of merging) -- these are clear duplicates. No source for Savage-7729 yet, so not sure where date/place of birth comes from. Note that 1594 birth date is unlikely, as she would have been 63 years old when son Roger was born; 1620 is more probable.