no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

George Edward Sizemore (abt. 1724 - bef. 1790)

George Edward [uncertain] Sizemore
Born about in Henrico, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1748 in Halifax, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 66 in Stokes, North Carolina, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Native Americans Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Oct 2016
This page has been accessed 1,474 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
George Sizemore is currently protected by the Native Americans Project for reasons described below.
Join: Native Americans Project
Discuss: native_americans
Due to theories that tie this profile to Sizemores with Native American DNA, this profile is being tracked by WikiTree's Native Americans project.

Contents

Biography

We seek reliable evidence that this George:

He died by 1790 when his wife Elizabeth was enumerated as head of household in Stokes, NC; (sons Newman and William are enumerated on the same page).[1] A possible additional son, George, was also enumerated in the 1790 census in Stokes. See below.

Research Notes

Sizemores of Stokes in 1790

  • George Sizemore: 1,1,1,-,-,3[2] - 1 free white male 16 or over [George]; 1 free white male under age 16; 1 white female. No other free people; no slaves. Three people in total. Was he a brother of Newman and William, below, and therefore son of George and Elizabeth?

On same page:[1]

  • Newman Sizemore: 1,2,1,-,-,4. One white male over 16 [Newman], 2 white males under 16, 1 female. No other free people; no slaves; 4 people in total.
  • William Sizemore: 1,2,4,-,-,7. One white male over 16 [William], 2 white males under 16; 4 females; no other free people; no slaves; 7 people in total
  • Elizabeth Sizemore [immediately following William]: 1,-,2,-,-,3. One white male 16 or over; no white males under 16; 2 white females; no other free persons; no slaves; 3 people in total.


Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 "United States Census, 1790," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GYY8-3WGS?cc=1803959&wc=22HB-Y6S%3A1584071002%2C1584071014%2C1584070607 : 14 October 2022), North Carolina > Stokes > Not Stated > image 5 of 13; citing NARA microfilm publication M637, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
  2. "United States Census, 1790," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GYY8-34SN?cc=1803959&wc=22HB-Y6S%3A1584071002%2C1584071014%2C1584070607 : 14 October 2022), North Carolina > Stokes > Not Stated > image 2 of 13; citing NARA microfilm publication M637, (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).

See also:

This is an interesting read for any descendant of the Sizemore family of the Appalachia. I am not a Sizemore, but I am of French and Indian ancestry. The French term Mélangeon, pleural of Métis has been used historically to describe anyone of mixed ancestry that includes an Indian component.
The 2,000 member “Whitetop Laurel Band of Cherokees,” founded sixty years after the Trail of Tears, and nine years before the Eastern Band of Cherokees in 1905. There are comments from many descendants of "Old Ned" Sizemore. jg [Jannie Gorman?]




Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with George:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
John Sizemore-293 might be the son of George Sizemore-842. Reasoning behind this is as follows: William Sizemore b. 1718 (m. Elizabeth) had a son named John Sizemore, but as was proven by various court documents, mainly Wills, this John had only daughters, and no sons.

Therefore, John Sizemore-293 can not be the son of William Sizemore b. 1718.

Within in the same family groupings at Wynne's Creek, Banister River, Lunenburg Co VA we have a group of children of George Sizemore-842 who may be the father of John.

posted by Lilly Martin
Lilly, I think you placed this comment on the wrong profile. Did you mean to post it on Sizemore-293 ?
posted by Jillaine Smith
I think that's possible because there was an obvious connection to Stokes, NC and because I have DNA matches to descendants of Henry "Tal" Sizemore-557 and Ephraim Sizemore-59, I believe. This means that Ephraim is potentially a brother of John Sizemore-293.
posted by Jennifer Campbell
Hi Steph, I hope you're doing well. A small group of us are trying to attend not only to the large number of duplicates of this man, but also to detangle him-- another profile was inapporpriately merged and has conflated multiple Georges.

In reviewing all the potential duplicates, I came across this profile.

The source being used-- Shawnee Heritage --- attaches him to a different set of parents than you've got here.

Now, first off, WikiTree's Native Americans project recommends STRONGLY against using Shawnee Heritage for anything. That said, what he's got about George of Ashe NC is possibly more accurate than some other online trees. We think.

But as I'm looking at this profile and the parents attached, I *think* that you're intending this profile to represent the man named Edward "Old Ned" Sizemore who some descendants have also ascribed the name George.

If so, then he's a duplicate of https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Sizemore-1159

CORRECTION: the lowest-numbered profile for Old Ned is Sizemore-38.

Thoughts?

posted by Jillaine Smith
edited by Jillaine Smith
UPDATE: Actually, I'm no longer certain that this profile is meant to represent the same man as Sizemore-38.

BUT it would still be good to find more reliable sources than Don Greene...

posted by Jillaine Smith

Rejected matches › Edward Sizemore (abt.1725-1780)

S  >  Sizemore  >  George Edward Sizemore

Categories: Native American Adjunct