He died by 1790 when his wife Elizabeth was enumerated as head of household in Stokes, NC; (sons Newman and William are enumerated on the same page).[1] A possible additional son, George, was also enumerated in the 1790 census in Stokes. See below.
Research Notes
Sizemores of Stokes in 1790
George Sizemore: 1,1,1,-,-,3[2] - 1 free white male 16 or over [George]; 1 free white male under age 16; 1 white female. No other free people; no slaves. Three people in total. Was he a brother of Newman and William, below, and therefore son of George and Elizabeth?
Newman Sizemore: 1,2,1,-,-,4. One white male over 16 [Newman], 2 white males under 16, 1 female. No other free people; no slaves; 4 people in total.
William Sizemore: 1,2,4,-,-,7. One white male over 16 [William], 2 white males under 16; 4 females; no other free people; no slaves; 7 people in total
Elizabeth Sizemore [immediately following William]: 1,-,2,-,-,3. One white male 16 or over; no white males under 16; 2 white females; no other free persons; no slaves; 3 people in total.
This is an interesting read for any descendant of the Sizemore family of the Appalachia. I am not a Sizemore, but I am of French and Indian ancestry. The French term Mélangeon, pleural of Métis has been used historically to describe anyone of mixed ancestry that includes an Indian component.
The 2,000 member “Whitetop Laurel Band of Cherokees,” founded sixty years after the Trail of Tears, and nine years before the Eastern Band of Cherokees in 1905. There are comments from many descendants of "Old Ned" Sizemore. jg [Jannie Gorman?]
Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with George:
John Sizemore-293 might be the son of George Sizemore-842. Reasoning behind this is as follows: William Sizemore b. 1718 (m. Elizabeth) had a son named John Sizemore, but as was proven by various court documents, mainly Wills, this John had only daughters, and no sons.
Therefore, John Sizemore-293 can not be the son of William Sizemore b. 1718.
Within in the same family groupings at Wynne's Creek, Banister River, Lunenburg Co VA we have a group of children of George Sizemore-842 who may be the father of John.
I think that's possible because there was an obvious connection to Stokes, NC and because I have DNA matches to descendants of Henry "Tal" Sizemore-557 and Ephraim Sizemore-59, I believe. This means that Ephraim is potentially a brother of John Sizemore-293.
Hi Steph, I hope you're doing well. A small group of us are trying to attend not only to the large number of duplicates of this man, but also to detangle him-- another profile was inapporpriately merged and has conflated multiple Georges.
In reviewing all the potential duplicates, I came across this profile.
The source being used-- Shawnee Heritage --- attaches him to a different set of parents than you've got here.
Now, first off, WikiTree's Native Americans project recommends STRONGLY against using Shawnee Heritage for anything. That said, what he's got about George of Ashe NC is possibly more accurate than some other online trees. We think.
But as I'm looking at this profile and the parents attached, I *think* that you're intending this profile to represent the man named Edward "Old Ned" Sizemore who some descendants have also ascribed the name George.
Therefore, John Sizemore-293 can not be the son of William Sizemore b. 1718.
Within in the same family groupings at Wynne's Creek, Banister River, Lunenburg Co VA we have a group of children of George Sizemore-842 who may be the father of John.
In reviewing all the potential duplicates, I came across this profile.
The source being used-- Shawnee Heritage --- attaches him to a different set of parents than you've got here.
Now, first off, WikiTree's Native Americans project recommends STRONGLY against using Shawnee Heritage for anything. That said, what he's got about George of Ashe NC is possibly more accurate than some other online trees. We think.
But as I'm looking at this profile and the parents attached, I *think* that you're intending this profile to represent the man named Edward "Old Ned" Sizemore who some descendants have also ascribed the name George.
If so, then he's a duplicate of https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Sizemore-1159
Thoughts?
edited by Jillaine Smith
BUT it would still be good to find more reliable sources than Don Greene...