no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Edward Stooks (abt. 1746)

Edward Stooks
Born about in Marbletown, Ulster, New York Colonymap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 5 Apr 1781 in Trois-Rivières, Province of Quebec, British North Americamap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Upper Canadamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Marie Svedahl private message [send private message] and Tracy Ahern private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Jan 2016
This page has been accessed 488 times.

Biography

Edward was born about 1746. Edward Stooks ...

Note: Edward is still alive in 1802 at the time of his son Richard's Upper Canada Land Petition, as he gives an affidavit for him.

Sources

1746 Christening New York Births and Christenings, 1640-1962. Book Number 974.734 M2 K2Z
  • Name: Edward Stooks
    • Son of: Richard Stooks and Mary Scheef
    • Christened: 1746 in Marbletown, Ulster, New York, British Colonial America
The History and Master Roll of The King's Royal Regiment of New York Brigadier General Ernest A. Cruikshank and Gavin K. Watt,--Revised Edition, Global Heritage Press Inc., Campbellville, Ontario, 2006, page 262.
  • From 1781 to 1783, Private Edward Stooks (Stoocks) served in Munro’s Company of the King’s Royal Regiment of New York. He had enlisted on Feb. 1, 1880. He was born in 1744 in the American colonies. In 1784, he was recorded in Niagara with a wife, two daughters, and two sons. He was approved for settlement in Matilda Township on north shore of the St. Lawrence River.
1781 Marriage
Name: Elzeard Stocks
Spouse: Anna Sepes
Marriage: April 5, 1781
Marriage Location: Trois-Rivières, Québec (Quebec)
Place of Worship or Institution: Protestant
Source Information: Ancestry.com. Quebec, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1621-1968 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2008.
..................
1784 Residence
Name: Edward Stooks
Event: Living
Year: 1784
Place: Matilda Township, Dundas County, Ontario
Source: Norman K. Crowder, Early Ontario Settlers, A Source Book, : Genealogical Publishing Co. Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, 1993.
Volume/Page: 52
Note: The province and county are associated with the location of the record source and in some cases may not be the same as the place where the event occured.
Source Information: Genealogical Research Library, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Genealogy Index, 1600s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2005.
..........
1797 Upper Canada Land Petitions
Microfilm Reel #C-2807 - #216 -
  • Edward Stooks, 4 June 1797
  • Petitions states "he has resided under the British government since 1778 and served in Sir John Johnson's regiment during the American War. That he took up 200 acres in the Eastern district which he lived on for some time but from a dispute with Allan Patterson, for the said lot, he has been disposed and remains now to be determined on by a court of law. Now without means to support his family, having no means to purchase a farm, asks for 200 acres in this district."
Microfilm Reel #C-2814 - Upper Canada Land Petitions, National Archives of Canada.
  • Edward Stooks
  • "discharged from Captain Monroe's Company, First Battalion, the Royal Regiment of New York, at the Peace of 1783. At that time, he had in Canada a wife and 8 children. Soon after discharge he had lands in Matilda with wife and 7 children. Lived for 20 years Lot 48 Westside Township of Vaughn. Improved 65 acres. Now very advanced in years and by misfortune reduced to low circumstances and asks for a lot on Yonge Street."
  • - 200 acres of land granted in 1798 on Yonge St.




Is Edward your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Edward by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Edward:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 6

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Edward Stooks (my 6x ggf) was baptized in Nov.1746 in Marbletown, NY. DNA matches on Ancestry confirm link to his parents/siblings. His parents are listed on his baptism record as Richard Stooks and Mary Scheef. That family also used the spelling Stokes a lot. Mary's first name is also listed as Grietje and Margriet, and her last name is also spelled Schever on other records. Edward had brothers Richard b.1745 and John b.1753 who my grandmother has dna matches from.

Edward had a 1st wife, Lidia Krom (b.1747)...they had a son in 1773 in Marbletown, named Johannes Krom Stokes. I think that is Edward's son John C. Stooks. John C. is listed as 88 on the 1861 Cdn Census.

posted by Jason Millar
I found this information while trying to prove that John C. Stooks was Edward's son. John made a land petition as the son of Edward who had served in the KRRNY. The regimental history had only one Edward Stooks.
posted by Fred Blair
Stookes-5 and Stooks-26 appear to represent the same person because: Ready to merge.
posted by Dave Rutherford
You have my full approval to continue with this merge as the two "Edward Stooks" are an obvious match.

My only comment about the merging of the wife - Remember that the Schauer were a German family, not long from the "old country", hence the given name "Annatje". However in an english speaking community Annatje would soon become Anna or Hannah. I doubt if there were two women named "Anna Schauers" who both married the same two husbands: Jacob Sipes & Edward Stooks.

Stookes-5 and Stooks-26 are not ready to be merged because: Need to confirm that wife is a merge.
posted by Tracy (McMillan) Ahern
Stookes-5 and Stooks-26 appear to represent the same person because: same person. birth dates are just estimates - no sources given for Edward's age, so either age could be used.
posted by Dave Rutherford

S  >  Stooks  >  Edward Stooks