Samuel Stout
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Samuel Stout (1713 - abt. 1801)

Samuel Stout
Born in Dragon Run, New Castle, Delawaremap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 23 Sep 1755 in Swatara, Berks, Pennsylvaniamap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 87 in Randolph, North Carolina, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Steve Hinton private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 3 Jan 2011
This page has been accessed 779 times.

Biography

Samuel Stout was born in 1713 at New Castle, Delaware. He was the son of Samuel Stout and Margaret Price.

Samuel Stout was married to Mary "Elizabeth" Thomas in 1755.[1]

After their marriage, Samuel and Elizabeth Stout moved to Randolph County, North Carolina, where they remained until their deaths.'[2][3]In his 1801 will, Samuel Stout of Randolph County, North Carolina named nine sons and four daughters as his heirs.

Samuel Stout made his will on November 5, 1799 at his home in Randolph County, North Carolina.[4] The Last Will and Testament of Samuel Stout was proved in Randolph County, North Carolina.[5] It was presented for probate at February Term, 1801.[6]

The beneficiaries named in the will of Samuel Stout are, as follows:

my wife, Elizabeth Stout, whose maintenance and expenses are to be paid during her widowhood by my son, Henry Stout.
to my son, Henry Stout, 100 acres of land where I now live, including of buildings, orchards and springs, all farming utensils, a bay mare and her young colt.

To my eight other sons, the rest of my land to be evenly divided among them. These sons are, as follows:

Samuel Stout
Peter Stout
John Stout
Charles Stout
Jacob Stout
Joseph Stout
William Stout
Jonathan Stout
to my daughter, Elizabeth Stout, six dollars.
to my daughter, Catherine Stout, twenty dollars.
to my daughter, Mary Stout, ten dollars.
to my daughter Rachel Cantrel, the wife of James Cantrel, a half dollar.

In his will, he names his cousin Charles Stout and friend John Allen his Executors

Sources

  1. Stoever, Johann Casper, 1707-1779; Schantz, F. J. F. (Franklin Jakob Fogel), The Records of Rev. John Casper Stoever : baptismal and marriage, 1730-1779, page 65. Link
  2. Source: #S-2056549836 Year: 1790; Census Place: Randolph, North Carolina; Series: M637; Roll: 7; Page: 287; Image: 169; Family History Library Film: 0568147.
  3. Source: #S-1350874728 Year: 1800; Census Place: Hillsboro, Randolph, North Carolina; Roll: 32; Page: 342; Image: 348; Family History Library Film: 337908.
  4. North Carolina Probate Records, 1735-1970 Randolph Wills, 1794-1804, Vol. 02, page 79.
  5. "North Carolina Probate Records, 1735-1970," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-LGHL-9Z52?cc=1867501&wc=32GM-VZ9%3A169889001%2C170828401 : 21 May 2014), Randolph > Wills, 1794-1804, Vol. 02 > image 42 of 79; county courthouses, North Carolina.
  6. Minutes of the County Court of Common Pleas and Quarter Sessions, 1779-1868, February Term, 1801, Family History Library, Film Number 007856628, Image 187 of 490. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CS73-S9R5-M?cat=164046.




Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Samuel:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Stout-1778 and Stout-146 appear to represent the same person because: Definitely meant to be the same person. They have different fathers, though, so more research will be needed.
posted by Beth Stephenson
Stout-1778 and Stout-146 are not ready to be merged because: The first biography is skinny at best, the name of the fathers are not the same. Granted that someone could have more than one name but the first names are so common. John, Samuel, Elizabeth... the years of birth a;sp are not the same

The second profile has been so well cared for I would hate to merge it with something shaky

posted by Anne-Marie Gélinas
Stout-4263 and Stout-146 appear to represent the same person because: Birth and death place same, siblings same

Unmerged matches › Samuel Stout (abt.1717-abt.1801)

S  >  Stout  >  Samuel Stout