no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Wood Sr. (1632 - bef. 1687)

Thomas Wood Sr.
Born in Market Harborough, Leicestershire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 7 Jun 1654 in Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died before before age 55 in Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 14 Apr 2010
This page has been accessed 10,933 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Wood Sr. migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm
This profile is part of the Wood Name Study.

Contents

Biography

Thomas Wood is an ancestor of Herbert Hoover and President Millard Fillmore[1]

Thomas Wood was born in April 1632 in Market Harborough in southern Leicestershire, England (christened on the 29th of that month as the "Sone of Edward Wood," see p. 137 of the Market Harborough Parish Register). His parents Edward and Ruth (Lee) Wood had come to Market Harborough from Nuneaton in northeastern Warwickshire in about 1628. The christening date corresponds well with the age of 41 that Thomas gave at a deposition in New England in 1674. [2][3] [4]

The family had some status in Market Harborough as Edward Wood was a church warden of the parish in 1631. (His clear, bold signature appears on page 136 of the register.)

Thomas Wood emigrated to Massachusetts Bay Colony with his parents and siblings in 1639. No passenger list mentioning any of the family has survived. (A reconstructed list of "arrivals" in Massachusetts assigns a date of 1654 to him, but that is merely the date of his first appearance on a public record in Massachusetts.) It must be assumed that he spent his first three years in Massachusetts helping with the family's bakery in Charlestown (now part of Boston). His mother died on 29 - 6th month (August), 1642. His father and youngest sister, Tabitha, both died just three months later, on 27 - 9th month (November).[5]

The extant records of Edward Wood's estate suggest the Court's concern for the children, but the details of their disposition of the family members and of the property are unclear.

  1. Perhaps the oldest son (Obadiah) kept the bakery going for a time even though he was only 17 years old at the time of his parents' deaths. He certainly followed his father's trade, as within a decade we find Obadiah operating his own bakery in Ipswich, Mass. [6] The first record of him in Ipswich lists him as joint owner of a triangular piece of land with Richard Schofield. [6] Notably, Richard Schofield had been christened in Halifax in the West Riding of Yorkshire, the home town of Michael Hopkinson, whose daughter Ann is thought to have become the wife of Thomas Wood. At a minimum, it is easy to imagine that Thomas Wood would have known his brother's partner Richard Schofield in Ipswich, and that the partner would have been acquainted with his Halifax homie Michael Hopkinson in adjacent Rowley during the period of Thomas' courtship of Ann (Hopkinson) Wood.
  2. Thomas' youngest surviving sister, Ruth, was taken in and raised by the Ralph Mousall family after the deaths of Edward Wood & Ruth (Lee) Wood. The reference in Mr. Mousall's will to her as his "daughter" has caused careless genealogists to assume that Ralph Mousall meant “granddaughter” meaning Mousall would have been the father of little Ruth’s mother, also named Ruth. This has caused Edward’s Wood’s wife, Ruth, to be incorrectly identified as Ruth Mousal/Mowsall in the Millennium File and many online trees. Millennium files are not considered reliable sources since they rarely give documentation for their claims.[7] The finding of the actual marriage record at St. Nicolas, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, England definitively debunks this Mousall theory as it reads: "1619 - Edward Wodd & Luth [Ruth] Lee both of this p[ari]sh mar[rid]d ye second day [of February].”[8]
  3. Thomas' younger brother Josiah remained in Charlestown.[9]
  4. Thomas Wood evidently lived with his oldest sister Elizabeth and learned the carpenter's trade from her husband, Solomon Phipps. Thomas seems to have found work in the building trade in the vicinity of Ipswich and the newer community of Rowley, for it was the latter community that recorded his marriage in 1654.[citation needed] However, Charlestown may have remained his primary residence as he was granted a lot there "near the mill of Founell, to be three poles wide" no later than 1654. That date corresponds approximately with Thomas Wood's coming of age. [10] The reference to "the mill of Founell" is to a tidal mill set up by John Fownell (also "Funnell" or "Furnell") of Cambridge, whose only son John, a close contemporary of Thomas Wood, died on 1 April 1654. Perhaps John Fownell designated Thomas Wood to take what would have been the inheritance of John Fownell Jr. had he lived; as John Fownell Sr. had, like Thomas Wood, been an orphan.

Thomas' marriage record does not disclose his wife's maiden name; only stating that Thomas & Ann Wood [were] married June 7, 1654. [11]

She was not the daughter of William Hunt of Concord & Marlborough, Mass., as some have supposed, but may well have been a relative. Notably, William's son Samuel Hunt and John Todd stood as sureties for the bond that Mary (____) Grant was required to post in connection with the probate of her husband's estate in 1696. This is significant because Thomas Wood called John Todd a "brother" (meaning brother in law) in a deposition, supporting the perception that Samuel Hunt had the same status; all the more so because (unlike John Todd) Samuel Hunt was not a neighbor or even a resident of Essex County, so the only normal reason for him to stand as bondsman would be a family relationship. In addition, the given name Samuel figures prominently among the names of Thomas & Ann Wood's descendants even though there is no known antecedent for it on Thomas' side.

As to the origin and parentage of Thomas' wife Ann (______) Wood, see the comment dated January 17, 2022 by Barry Wood and the related G2G discussion. The assertion that she was born on May 17, 1635 in Rowley, Massachusetts is obviously bogus because Rowley had not yet been settled at that time. The unsourced birth date of 17 May 1635 is least in the right general timeframe, as it would make her 19 years old on her wedding date. She died on 29 Dec 1714 in Rowley.

On 14 December 1655, Thomas received payment from the estate of Hugh Smith for the making of a coffin. On 1 April 1658 he was a witness to a bond of Joseph Jewett of Rowley to John Hall of Newbury.

Thomas had a grant of land in Rowley and remained there the rest of his life. In the earliest tax list, Thomas' taxes were listed at 7 shillings and 3 pence.

In 1661, the town resurveyed the rights of commonage for its inhabitants because of the number of land parcels that had changed hands since Rowley had been founded in 1639. In the original distribution the number of "gates" was assigned according to the acreage owned: the greater the acreage, the more"gates". In the resurvey, Thomas Wood is shown to have one gate.

Thomas' first appearance in the town records of Rowley following his marriage (other than the records of his children's births) is dated 4 October 1661, when he was one of six men engaged by the town to build a pen to catch wolves. On 25 March 1662 he, with Obadiah Wood of Ipswich, was "made free," meaning that he became entitled to vote in town meetings. [12]

He was accused before the Rowley Church, 28 Aug 1667, of having the deed to his land written so as to include sixty rods of a meadowland claimed by Rev. Samuel Phillips, the minister of Rowley, and of pulling down the fence. We know nothing of the background of this matter from Thomas' point of view; he may have had a bona fide claim to the land in his mind based on representations made to him a decade or more earlier. However, he must have realized that there was no upside for him in pursuing a fight with the town's minister. The situation ended with Thomas confessing his "sin" in church and the Rev. Phillips receiving clear title to the property in question.

In 1667 and 1671 he was selected a "pinder" - a person in charge of impounding stray cattle. In 1677, Thomas was shown to be a freeholder of two lots.

He prospered in his trade as a homebuilder, and came to own the largest house in Rowley. Unfortunately, he lost this home to a fire in 1675, though the loss of the structure was not the worst part of the fire. [13]

The town appointed Thomas Wood and ten others as tithing men in 1680.[citation needed] His obligation was to keep a watch on ten families, this job being akin to a "religious policeman". He had to take notice of who attended services, find out why those who didn't attend weren't there, and keep order at the church service. His sign of "office" was a long black staff. Thomas was among the recipients of land when the Hog Island marshes were divided.

Thomas was buried 12 September 1687 in Rowley. A death date of 9 September has been asserted for him, though we find no contemporary source for it. It is probably at least close to correct, as under the customs of the times the interval between death and burial in times of warm weather would not have been greater than three days, if that much.

His will was dated 21 Jul 1687. It was proved 7 Nov. 1687 in - for reasons that are obscure - Suffolk County Court rather than in Essex County. (Possibly Thomas still had property in Charlestown such that probate in the capital jurisdiction was deemed appropriate.)

Thomas’ will mentions his wife Anne; sons John (eldest), Thomas, Josiah, Samuel, Solomon, Ebenezer & James; daughters Mary Chute, Ann Plummer & Ruth Jewett; and brother Obediah Wood of Ipswich. He named his son Thomas (his oldest son still resident in Rowley) and & his wife executors of the will. [14][15]

"The last will and testament of Thomas Wood Senr. of Rowley, in the County of Essex in New England made the twenty-first day of July one thousand six hundred eighty and seven:
I Thomas Wood of Rowley, in the county of Essex in New England being at present weake in body but perfect in Understanding and memory Doe make this my Last will and Testament in form and manner as followeth Imprimis:
I commit my Soule unto the hands of God hoping for a Joyful reasurection through Jesus ·Christ my Gracious Redeemer And my will is that my Body be Decently buried and that the Charges thereof In the first place be paid out of my estate And then that my honest & Due Debts Unto all men be paid out of my estate and the rest of my estate wch God hath given me I Dispose of itt as followeth Imprimis:
I doe give unto my beloved wife Anne during her Naturall Life Provideth that shee marrye not againe my house Barne and Orchard where I doe now dwell that is on both sides of the way And my Lott that is neere unto Symons Brooke lyelng betweene Land of Phillipp Nellson Senr. and Land Laid out to the Towne of Rowley and all my Land att Planting Hill called the name of Parrotts Lott and my five acres Lyeing att the farme Commonly Called Mr. Dumers farme; wch I purchased of Mr. Nehemiah Jewett; and all my Marsh att Hogg Island that was granted to me by the Town of Rowley; as right of my Gates And alsoe that Marsh that I purchased of Samuel Sticknee And alsoe the freehold that doe belong to the house; where I now doe Live Also I doe give her during the time that shee continues my Widow all my Stock And also all my Right in the Land that I doe hire of the Town of Rowley by Lease from the said Town for her to Improve During my time in itt Excepting That parcell of Meadow that doth Lye att Hawke Meadow; wch by Lease from the Town doth belong to me This parcell I Doe except Shee not being to have the Improve-ment of itt During the time of the Townes Lease to me. And also she is to have my Cart Ploughs; and all my Tackling and furniture belonging to Husbandry Also I doe give unto my Said wife all my household goods within Doores; She is in the first place to have the Choice of two bedds with all furniture belonging to them and all the rest of the goods within Doores
Item I doe give unto my Eldest Sonne John Wood the whole farme att Bradforth wch I purchased of Phillipp Nellson Senr. of Rowley; with this Provisoe that bee doth pay Thirty pounds of itt; fifteen pounds whereof my will is that he doth pay unto his Brother Josiah Wood in Come or neate Cattle Sometime within two years after my Decease; And my will is that Tenn pounds more of this Thirty hee doth pay unto his Brother Samuell the year after he is to pay the ffifteen pounds to his brother Josiah; And the other five pounds my will is that he pay to my Daughter Chute of Ipswich The year after hee is to pay the Ten pounds to his Brother Samuell
Item I doe give unto my Second Sonne Thomas Wood the house that hee now dwelleth in; wch I built And the Eight Acres of Land belonging to itt. Item I doe give him upon these two Provisoes following the Three Acres of Land that Doth Lye next to the foresaid Eight acres as men do goe to Rowley Mill or to Bradforth ffirst that hee doe pay Twenty pounds for itt; Tenn pounds whereof is to be paid in money to be paid to such as I doe Owe money unto; and that as soone as itt is called for; and Three pounds ffive shillings hee is to pay in Molasses att Twelve Pence a Gallon unto Jethro Wheeler when itt is due to him and Six pounds ffifteen Shillings hee is to pay to Mr. John Wainright of Ipswich in good Merchants pay some time within One year after my Decease::
The other Provisoe is that the bargain that I have made with my Brother Obediah Wood of Ipswich for to build him a house; that hee [Thomas Wood Jr.] perform the bargain yt. I made and for to receive the pay for itt and that he is to have all the timber that I have got home for the said house and all the boards that is doe lye upon my Brother Obediah land for the finishing of the said house and he is not allow anything for the said Timber or boards if he perform the Covenant that I made with my Brother Obediah Wood::
Also I doe give unto my Sonne Thomas my brass sword and Bandyleers and a boulting plaine and a Rabbitting plaine.
Item I doe give unto my Sonns Josiah & Samuell to be Equally Divided betweene them the Eighty Acres of upLand and Meadow that I bought of Mr. Dumer. To my Sonne Josiah I give also the Bed that I lie on with the Boulster and the Rugg and blanket that is upon the Bed that hee doth Lye on And also my best haire Camblett Coate and a paire Serge Breeches and a broad Axe and a musquette.
And to my Sonne Samuell the bed and boulster that is upon the Trunell Bed with the Rugg and Blanket that doth belong to itt and my best Searge Jackett and a broad Axe and a Musquett and an Inch Auger and an Inch and a half Auger and a paire of Mortising Chisels to each of them and one Joynor One Rabiting Plaine and One Boulting plaine and One Casement Plaine and one reavete and one Joyners Chissell these Plaines to have them equally between them and to use them both alike::
Alsoe I doe give unto each of them a Bible and my will is that my Sons Josiah and Samuell doe finish Mr. Wainrigh's warehouse haveing the help of their Brother Solomon as much as cann be.
Item I doe give to my Sonne Solomon the Lott that was laid out to me att Clay Brooke; and the salt Marsh that I purchased of John Sawyer and John Bayley [?)] lying at Hogg Island and hee to have the improvement of One halfe of Meadow at Hawke meadow wch I have hired of the Town as long as my Lease doth last; and the Other halfe of the Meadow att Hawke meadow my two sons Josiah and Samuell to have the Improvement of it as long as my Lease is from the Town doth last. Item I doe give unto my said Sonne Solomon the mare that he bought [of] Goodwife West. And all the rest of my Carpentry Tools that I have not given away to my Sonns I leave Improvement of them to him till he doth Mar[r]y; and then they are to be Left to my two youngest two Sonns Ebenezer and James Alsoe I doe give unto him a musquett and a bible::
Item I doe give unto my two youngest Sonns Ebenezer and James when they come to the age of One and Twenty yeares all the fore mentioned parcells of Land and meadow with house and Barns that I have before given to my wife During her naturall Life; my true meaning is that if my two youngest Sonns live to the age of One and Twenty yeares then they are each of them to have the said Lands soe given to her to be equally Divided betwixt them and they are to mainteyne their mother as long as shee doth Live my widdow and my will further is that both my Sonns Solomon doth Live with his mother untill he doth come to the age of One and Twenty yeares And also both my sons Ebenezer and James and if any of these three Solomon Ebenezer or James doe Dye before they come to the Age of One and Twenty yeares then the portion or portion of the Deced to be Divided amongst the Surviving of those three and that equally.
And my will is that my Debts be paid out of yt estate that I doe leave to my wife and my two youngest Sonns: except it be that twenty pounds that my Sonne Thomas is to pay::
And to my three Daughters Mary Chute Anne Plummcr and Ruth Jewett having formally given to them three score pounds apiece as doth appear by my booke, I doe now give unto them now more five pounds apiece And have ordered my Sonne John Wood to pay five pounds And to my Daughter Mary Chute as I have before Ordered him in this my Last will. And my will further is that my wife att her decease do give five pounds to my Daughter Anne Plommer and five pounds to my Daughter Ruth Jewitt out of the household goods that I have given her and the rest of the household goods I leave them to her Disposing to any of my children to be given by her as shee shall thinke best and I doe make my Sonne Thomas Wood Executor and my wife Executrix with him Joyntly to Joyne in the Execution and performance of this my last will and Testament Desiring them that they will in all these mentioned particulars may well and truly be Formed In witness whereof I have hereunto sett my hand and Seal This Twenty first day of July in the yeare Our Lord 1687."
Signed Thomas Wood Senr. with his Seale.

The will is followed by an inventory of his estate which was valued at about 3,000 pounds.

Thomas Wood's wife, Ann, died Dec. 29, 1714. [16]

Children

All the children were born in Rowley.[4] [17]

  1. Mary b. 15 Mar 1655
  2. John b. 2 Nov 1656
  3. Thomas b. 10 Aug 1658
  4. Ann b. 8 Aug 1660
  5. Ruth b. 21 July 1662
  6. Elizabeth b. 5 Sep 1664 (twin)
  7. Josiah b. 5 Sep 1664 (twin)
  8. Samuel b. 26 Dec 1666
  9. Solomon b. 17 May 1669
  10. Ebenezer b. 29 Dec 1671
  11. James b. 22 Jun 1674

Research Notes

  1. ) Because Thomas Wood in a deposition called John Todd "brother," some have assumed that Thomas' wife Ann was born Ann "Todd," but that is erroneous. The will of Mary Grant, widow of John Grant of Rowley, dated 2 Feb., proved 16 Feb 1697/98, discloses that Ann, wife of Thomas Wood, and Susanna, wife of John Todd, were sisters of the testator.
  2. ) There is an SAR application that references Ann Todd as Thomas' wife. It lists his death date as 12 October 1687 which would be after his burial date listed in other sources. [18]
  3. ) It should be noted that sources like Findagrave, Millennium Files, American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI), Family Data Collection, US and International Marriage Records, DAR and SAR records often found in the "Hints" on Ancestry are not considered valid sources as most are not based on documented evidence. While documentation can be found in some of these records, documentation is not required. Researchers should be very careful when using them.

Sources

  1. Roberts, Gary Boyd; Ancestors of American Presidents, Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009, page 39.
  2. John Sumner Wood, The Wood Family Index (Garrett & Massie, Germantown, Maryland, 1966) (578 pages) - Person - Thomas (1), p. 523, states "age 41 in 1674", bro of Obadiah and Josiah of Charlestown and Rowley MA (Vols. 21,24 Essex Institute Hist. Coll.)Comm. Biogr. Record Tolland and Windham Co. CT p. 986
  3. Comm. Biogr. Record Tolland and Windham Co. CT p. 986
  4. 4.0 4.1 Smith, Dean Crawford. Space:The Ancestry of Eva Belle Kempton, 1878-1908 (Boston, New England Historical and Genealogical Society, 2004), Part III, p. 478.
  5. Wyman, Thomas B., The Genealogies and Estates of Charlestown (1871), p. 1044 - but note that Wyman blundered in his identification of Thomas Wood's wife Ruth as the daughter of Ralph Mousall, and in the marriage he erroneously assigned to Thomas and Ruth's daughter Ruth (Wood) Upham. - BW
  6. 6.0 6.1 Gen.com profile on Obadiah Wood, https://www.geni.com/people/Obadiah-Wood-of-Ipswich/6000000004630664260.
  7. Heritage Consulting. The Millennium File. Salt Lake City, UT, USA: Heritage Consulting.
  8. Ancestry.com. Warwickshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages, and Burials, 1535-1812[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Original data: Warwickshire Anglican Registers. Warwick, England: Warwickshire County Record Office.
  9. Josiah [1] (born 1634), married Lydia Bacon of Charlestown in 1657. They appear to have remained in Charlestown the rest of their lives. Their children were named Josiah [2] (born August 10, 1658; baptized July 8, 1662; died March 9, 1740), Lydia (born May 6, 1662; died September 17, 1681), Samuel (born September 12, 1671), Joseph (baptized October 27, 1674), and Ruth (baptized April 4, 1676). Lydia died November 25, 1674. Josiah (Sr.) died September 24, 1691.
  10. Wyman, Thomas B., The Genealogies and Estates of Charlestown (1871), p. 1044
  11. Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook).
  12. Janet I. Delorey, "The English Origins and Descendants of the Fourth Generation of Edward Wood of Charlestown, MA." in The Genealogist, vol. 9, No. 1, Spring 1988, p. 90.
  13. In the Diary of Hon. Samuel Sewall (Vol. 1, p. 10) is the following: "1675 July 31, at midnight, Tho. Wood, carpenter, of Rowley, had his house and goods burnt, and vae malum, a daughter of about 10 years of age, who directed her brother so that he got out, was herself consumed to ashes."
  14. Suffolk Probate 10:168
  15. Blodgette, George Brainard, Early Settlers of Rowley, Massachusetts Revised, Edited and Published by Jewett, Amos Everett. Newcomb & Gauss Co., Printers, Salem, Massachusetts, USA, 1933. Reprinted by the New England History Press, Somersworth, New Hampshire. 1981. Pgs. 411-2. [Note that Blodgette erred in assigning Daniel Wood of Boxford to this family. - BW]
  16. Find A Grave, database and images (http://findagrave.com : accessed 24 March 2016), memorial page for Thomas Wood (1633–1687), Find A Grave Memorial no. 38803101 [implied source is the Rowley town records. link
  17. Ancestry.com. Massachusetts, U.S., Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Original data: Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, UT: Holbrook Research Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook)
  18. Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970. Louisville, Kentucky: National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. Microfilm, 508 rolls. Volume: 343
See Also:
  • Savage, Genealogical Dictionary, Vol. 4 p. 629
  • History of Rowley, MA, p. 461
  • Wood Genealogy, pp 7, 9
  • Pope, Pioneers of Massachusetts, pg. 510: citing NEHGS Reg. III, 81.
  • Wood Family Genealogy Page (unsourced)
  • Eliva Wood, The ancestry and descendants of Ebenezer Wood of West Gouldsborough, Maine, 1930. Pg 1. link
  • Frank R. Holmes, compiler, Directory of the Ancestral Heads of New England Families, 1620-1700, New York, 1923. Reprinted by Genealogical Publishing Co, Baltimore, 1964.
Acknowledgments:
  • WikiTree profile Wood-6463 created through the import of 00zfc5_802469u520m0l20m6i7fpd.ged on Nov 3, 2012 by Tamara Stevens.
  • WikiTree profile Wood-4023 created through the import of HERMANSON_RICHARDSON.ged on Sep 13, 2011 by John Hermanson.




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 49

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
There is a small group of 10 Wood men who descend from Thomas Wood b. 1632 who have formed a YDNA project focused this family (FTDNA website). Through a YDNA test we can now identify if you descend from Thomas even if you have a brick wall in your line. The haplogroup R1b-BY21620 has been identified as the umbrella group for this family. If you or someone you know is a Wood male (or think you might be) from the many branches of Thomas Wood, please feel free to contact me if you'd like to participate and help us identify and untangle these branches.
posted by Bob Wood
The issue of the identity of Ann (___) Wood and her sisters Mary (____) Grant and Susanna (____) Todd has bothered me for over 35 years -- and numerous other genealogists - much longer than that. The most eminent lights of the New England Historic Genealogical Society, almost from its founding, have contemplated the issue, and come away only scratching their heads.

The answer has suddenly dawned on me. It has been in front of us all this time in plain sight; well, sort of.

In the case of John Acie v. John Pickard before the Ipswich Quarterly Court's session beginning 30 March 1675, we find several of the people involved in this conundrum testifying: Thomas Wood, his "brother" John Todd, and Ann [(Brigg) Hopkinson Trumbull] Swan, as well as Ann's son John Hopkinson and stepson Joseph Trumbull.

Apparently the fight between Acie and Pickard had something to do with the failed romance between John Hopkinson and Hannah Palmer, Acie's niece. John's mother, Ann [(Brigg) Hopkinson Trumbull] Swan, was dead set against her son marrying Hannah, as Ann did not fancy being that closely related to Acie. Apparently Acie wasn't too keen on Ann, either, so he meddled in the situation and bribed Hannah to end her engagement with John Hopkinson, taking from her the "tokens" that John had given her, and throwing them back at her fiance.

The lovers were broken-hearted, but what could they do? Acie would have his way. Pickard blabbed about the tiff and perhaps other issues regarding Acie in a town meeting, in the courthouse lobby, out in the fields and in some tavern, all in a light unfavorable to Acie. This led Acie to sue Pickard for slander.

The jury must have been convinced by certain testimony that Acie was a rough piece of work, as they found initially for the defendant. But then they were admonished by the judges to reconsider, whereupon they found for Acie. The outcome is not particularly important. What interested me was that John Todd and Thomas Wood seem to have gone out of their way to support Ann [(Brigg) Hopkinson Trumbull] Swan's view of John Acie's character in this fracas.

On a separate quest, I have, in the last 15 hours, found the origins of Ann's first husband Michael Hopkinson in Halifax and Kildwick, Yorkshire. Four children were born to this couple and chr. at Kildwick between the marriage date of 1624 and their departure for America, specifically:

John, chr. August 1625 at Kildwick,

Anna, chr. 23 March 1628/9 at Kildwick,

Richard, chr. 2 Oct 1631 at Kildwick, and

Maria (Latin equivalent of Mary), chr. 26 Oct 1634 at Kildwick.

Additional children born to Michael & Ann Hopkinson in Rowley following their arrival in the New Word (1638). These were entered in the Rowley town records and are well known. (Their son Jonathan, whose daughter Esther married Thomas Burkby / Burpee, is an ancestor of my great great grandfather John Wood (1815-1890) through his mother Sarah (Burpee) Wood.) But there was no need for anyone to make a record of the children who had been born in England and came along for the ride, as it were. Accordingly, to this point the wikitree profile on Michael Hopkinson has been blissfully unaware of their existence.

Or did these children all die in England before the parents' emigration? A "John Hopkinson" was buried 1 December 1634 at nearby Bradford, Yorkshire (see https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-99F6-4GS7?cc=4319956&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3A68ZX-1YNZ), and a "Richard Hopkinson de Hallifax," was buried in Halifax 19 April 1637 (see https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-99FH-C6F5?cc=4319956&personaUrl=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3A68ZD-NYD2).

That might account for the two boys, but try as I might, I could find no burial record for either of the daughters in England. So the question arose -- what happened to the girls?

This led me to wonder -- Ann and Mary, Ann and Mary, hmmmm -- those are the given names of two of the three supposed "Hunt" or "maiden name unknown" sisters of Rowley, Mass. Was there perhaps also a "Susan" Hopkinson as well, to match up with the three sisters of mystery? It seemed plausible enough because, as I just discovered, Michael Hopkinson's mother was named Susan. (She was born Susan "Emot," as identified in the marriage record 25 March 1600 in Halifax.)

I checked FamilySearch for "Susan Hopkinson," and immediately found the christening of Susan Hopkinson on 3 February 1632/3 at St. James Parish, Halifax, the daughter of Michael Hopkinson. Thus for a year or two this couple evidently moved back to Michael's home town of Halifax from the extremely rural precincts of Kildwick, before returning to the sticks.

Most importantly, this established that the three daughters of Michael & Ann Hopkinson who would have come with them to Rowley in 1639 from Yorkshire were Ann, Mary.... and Susan!

I believe that these are the three mysterious sisters whose identity has bedeviled genealogists for the past 150 years or more. As it turns out, these were not random waifs shipped over from London to find husbands in New England in the manner of the "filles du Roi." They were part of a proper Puritan family who had been in Rowley from its founding.

After all, they were between five and ten years old when the Hopkinson family arrived in Rowley. They grew to eligible womanhood over the next 13 years, when Thomas Wood, John Todd and John Grant were looking for wives. We needn't think that these men had to go to Connecticut or some such far-flung place to find wives, or even to Boston or Salem. They were all right there in Rowley, part of one the roughly 20 founding families of that community. The fact that Michael Hopkinson died before writing a proper will has concealed from us this entire time, until now, the identity of his three England-born daughters.

This does not exactly explain why Samuel Hunt was willing to stand surety for the widow Mary Grant - the event that has fed the notion of the sisters' "Hunt" identity lo these many years. However, I would note that Samuel's father, William Hunt, was from Halifax, the same as Michael Hopkinson. The two were close in age and evidently both of radical Puritan persuasion theologically. Both came to Massachusetts at about the same time. It is reasonable to posit that the two were life-long friends. Thus Samuel's decision to leave his father's place in Concord and locate in Ipswich for a time seems, at least in part, to be the product of his father's friendship with the Hopkinson family of adjacent Rowley.

In short, you have all elements of the "three sisters" quandary satisfied by the Michael & Ann Hopkinson family, as illuminated by pre-emigration records from Yorkshire, and the Acie - Pickard squabble revolving around John Hopkinson's love life and his mother's distaste for the meddling uncle of her son's intended.

Bingo.

posted by Barry Wood
Barry, I had to read that a few times to follow it. Many names and relations... (It's also long after midnight ...)

Very interesting theory. Could you cite the court records so we could take a look?

I also recommend you write this up, Register style, and submit it to NEHGR. They'd go over it with a fine tooth comb, but hopefully publish it if they found the theory stands up.

In any case, I'd l8ke a few others to weigh in before we change the LNAB.

posted by Jillaine Smith
Good idea, Jillaine. It might also be a good topic to post to G2G where it will get a broad audience.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
I agree with posting to G2G with something like this.

Reading through the argument, I would agree that the identification is correct. Finding three perfect baptisms, all in the correct time frame and in the correct location, is good enough to establish the English origins of GM immigrants. I would also think this is publishable in the NEHGR.

posted by Joe Cochoit
edited by Joe Cochoit
Thanks. I also appreciate your supplying the link to the RFQC of Essex County publication. I had it up on my screen but have been busy with "real" work.
posted by Barry Wood
I have updated the profile of Michael Hopkinson.

See also the free-space: Identity of sisters Ann ( ) Wood, Mary ( ) Grant and Susanna ( ) Todd

There are a couple of problems which need to be addressed, so I have started a G2G question: Origins of Michael Hopkinson and daughters Ann Wood, Mary Grant and Susanna Todd?

  1. Why weren't the three daughters named in the administration of Michael Hopkinson's estate?
  2. Does the chronology make sense?

Your thoughts would be appreciated.

posted by Joe Cochoit
edited by Joe Cochoit
"Could you cite the court records so we could take a look?"
  • Essex County Courts. Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex... vol. 6: 1675-1678. (Salem: The Essex Institute, 1917): pages 14-16, .
posted by Joe Cochoit
You might want to create a free-space page where you can provide information and sources to support this, then you could link all three sisters to the page.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Good suggestion. Not sure how to do that, though.
posted by Barry Wood
You can create a free-space page by going to the Add Tab at the top and then New Project. This will create a page where you can write whatever you want. You can format it just like you would a profile page of a person. I went ahead and created a free-space page just to get you started. Send me your email and I will add you as the Profile Manager.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Barry, you haven't replied to any of my emails. I am going to begin updating these profiles.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Joe -- I appreciate your input on this. I'm sorry to say this, but I am not sure that I received your emails. In any event, I got busy with other things shortly after posting the above and haven't been back into the subject for quite a while. I appreciate your updating the profiles.
posted by Barry Wood
Wow, Barry, this is a fascinating read and I strongly echo the suggestion that you write this up for NEHGR to peer review. What a great piece of research. Congrats!
posted by Scott McClain
edited by Scott McClain
Scott, I appreciate the support! Yes, I agree that this should be dressed up for an article in NEHGR, especially considering that the alleged "Hunt" connection has been the subject of prior analysis in The American Genealogist and maybe other places. Those pieces, as you know, debunked the supposed William Hunt paternity, but they weren't able to present the puzzle solution. Honestly, I rather surprised myself by sort of stumbling into the solution to an issue that had bugged me for decades. If I weren't already a Michael Hopkinson descendant (through one of his Mass.-born sons), I probably wouldn't have gotten lucky on this "three sisters" quandary, as my initial goal was just to locate Michael's English origins.
posted by Barry Wood
Barry,

You need to copy and paste this discussion to Ann (_____) Wood's profile (unknown 426730! Great stuff!!

posted by Sara (Stevens) Patton
Interesting that Anna Brigg Hopkinson Trumble Swan (whew!) didn't mention her Hopkinson daughters in her will though she did name other daughters and her Hopkinson sons. Did Michael Hopinson have a will naming any kids?
posted by Sara (Stevens) Patton
Sara - Thanks for raising these points.

I agree that the omission of Ann, Mary and Susan from the will of Ann (Brigg) Hopkinson Trumble Swan is an issue that should be addressed in any comprehensive analysis of their parentage. However, I don't think that it's much of an obstacle to my theory, in light of all the circumstances.

First, this was a very small estate, amounting to only 41 pounds 4s. 3d. valuation (or 35 pounds 11 shillings and thruppence net of the debts). It's not as though she had a great deal to give away. Per the inventory, she had no cash at all.

Ann, as a widow, would have received a "life estate" (a/k/a "dower") in the real estate of her several husbands upon their deaths, but nothing in the way of a "fee" that she could have devised to any of her heirs. Upon her death, the permanent title to any real property she occupied pursuant her dower rights would have reverted to the estates of the various husbands. So the object of the will was to dispose of her personal property. That mainly consisted of a very few items of furniture, kitchen utensils, bedding, five farm animals and three acres of unharvested grain. One can track most of the items mentioned in the will to the inventory. Ann directed that nearly all of the household furniture and bedding be given to her Trumble daughters, of whom Abigail Bailey was a young mother expecting her third child imminently, and Mary Kilburn a bride of about six weeks. Indeed, Mary got the "feather bed & .... Bedstead Mary lyeth on," so possibly the newlyweds were living with Mother Swan, and not even yet in their own home.

The one bed not bequeathed to them went to son Caleb, still a bachelor, presumably living at home. John, who I gather was his mother's favorite, got the "great chair" and a kettle. Beyond that (in light of the need to liquidate the animals and/or grain to satisfy Ann's debts), there was virtually nothing else that Ann could have bequeathed to her older daughters assuming that they had wanted to. But there was no need for such, as all three were evidently in comfortable circumstances. Thomas Wood was making good money building houses, and was able to afford the largest house in Rowley (it was the former Bellingham home, if I recall correctly). John Grant and John Todd were likewise prosperous enough, and didn't need any help from their mother-in-law's tiny estate.

In sum, this is a short will disposing of the effects around the house. It was evidently home-made rather than the work of an attorney worried about challenges to the will from the unnamed older children. So in context the failure to mention the three older (Hopkinson) daughters does not pose a significant problem for me.

As to Michael's will, the notation in the 1657 court record ("the General Court moderated fines of Nicholas Jackson and John Trumble for not proving the wills of their wives’ former husbands, Hugh Chaplin and Mighill Hobkinson." RFQC Essex 2:52, September Court, 1657) is the only basis for our knowing that "Mighill" had a will at all.

Sadly, it was not recorded, so we don't know the contents. The court simply authorized that the property be distributed to the widow and her children [presumably per the terms of the will]. Given that all of Michael's children were minors at the time of his death, the typical will for that time would have given everything to the widow for the maintenance of the family until some future time, when the oldest son would get the farm, subject to an obligation to pay his siblings their shares of its value as they came of age or married; something like that. I have read at least a thousand of these wills where I have felt like cursing the testator for leaving it at that and not naming the other children (or in probably the majority of cases, not naming ANY of the children).

posted by Barry Wood
Elizabeth Wood-103 is not named in her father Thomas Wood's 1687 will, "... to my three Daughters Mary Chute Anne Plummcr and Ruth Jewett", and per source #9 above, are we able to conclude daughter Elizabeth Wood-103 is the probable unnamed 10 year daughter who perished in the house fire July 1675 and therefor NOT the Elizabeth Wood who married, as his second wife, Capt Joseph Boynton -128, 11 Mar 1720 Rowley, Essex, MA?
posted by Twohig Riley
Yes. The second wife of Capt. Boynton must have been the widow of some man named Wood in the vicinity. Over the weekend I stumbled across what seemed to be a very good candidate for Elizabeth's previous husband; i.e., a Wood dying about 1715 to 1718, but now I can't recall who it was. Not sure if this deceased husband was a descendant of Edward Wood (i.e., through Thomas of Rowley or Obadiah of Ipswich), as in this vicinity there were also Daniel Wood of "Rowley Village" (now Boxford) and Isaiah in Ipswich. (Those being to my knowledge about the only early Wood families in Rowley & Ipswich). If I can summon any details I will get back to you.
posted by Barry Wood
edited by Barry Wood
Twohig -- I'm still trying to figure out the correct death date for Daniel Wood "II" of Boxford. I notice that his WIkitree page has a death date of 1715, but no such date appears in either the Boxford or Rowley town vital records. His FindaGrave profile says that his will was proved 22 Feb 1714/5, but it doesn't mention the date when the will was written. I suspect that the date of execution of the will has been confused with the date of probate. Further, the 1719 probate documents that actually do exist for Daniel Wood mention a "widow," which would be impossible if he died immediately after the death of Sarah (Andrews) Wood.

I see that the administrator's bond is dated April, 1719, with the inventory submitted that month to the Court. The probate index (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9Y5-1ZRT?i=749&cat=412735) says that the will is "on file," but I haven't found where it was recorded. Anyway, I am a bit suspicious that 1715 was the date of the will, but he didn't die then, such that Daniel Wood was still alive in time to marry the widow Elizabeth (Pearson) Hopkinson 15 Nov 1715 in Rowley (VR). She would have then become "Elizabeth Wood," and would have been a widow (for a second time) no later than April of 1719. At that point, she would have been eligible to marry Capt. Joseph "Bointon" per the record of their announced intentions 5 March 1720/1 (Rowley VR).

posted by Barry Wood
Hello Barry, I'm not the best at deciphering those old wills, but I think the will date is 22 Feb 1714/15, and the probate date i is 6 Apr 1719.
Daniel Wood, Probate Record 1719, Boxford Essex Massachusetts, Case Number 30247, pages 17, Date of record 20 Apr 1719, interstate, Essex Cases 3000-31999. His will appears to list heirs son David Wood, son John Wood, son Jacob Wood, daughter Sarah Wood, grandson Daniel Wood, daughter Huldah Bridges, son David Wood executor, “this twenty second day of February: anno Dom 1714/15"

Source: https://www.americanancestors.org/databases/essex-county-ma-probate-file-papers-1638-1881

posted by Twohig Riley
The link returns a "This Page Doesn't Exist" error. I believe the following link should work:

https://www.americanancestors.org/DB1652/i/33911/106/891370297

If that is the actual probate case needed, the full set of 17 pages is found beginning here: https://www.americanancestors.org/DB515/i/14204/30247-co1/259507979

Pages 10-11 of the packet contain the will. Sons David, John, and Jacob mentioned, daughter Sarah Wood, daughter Huldah Bridges. No mention of a wife. Dated 22 Feb 1714/5.

The first page of the will section (p. 12 of the packet) says, "Last will and testament of Daniel Wood late of Boxford deceased." on a new line it says: "1719 April 6."

However, Daniel was married at least twice, as p. 7 of the probate packet, dated 25 Jun 1719 shows, at the end something "unto the widdow.." and on the inventory (p. 8 of the packet) dated Apr 1719 it mentions "Item to Bed and Bedding his second wife brought with her..."

David Wood and John Wood settled the estate 15 Jun 1719, and said (p. 14 of the packet): "...the remainer of the estate to the widow..." and also "...the widow to have one third o the remainder..."

A letter from Dan'l Rogers on p. 16 of the packet mentions "the widow" multiple times, but I can't decipher the penmanship very well and can't see a name.

This sounds like sometime between 22 Feb 1714/5 he married and that he died April 1719.

posted by Scott Carles
edited by Scott Carles
thank you for fixing Scott, much appreciated.
posted by Twohig Riley
Can we resolve the conflicting information on the birth date? The bio says "Thomas Wood was born in April 1632 in Market Harborough in southern Leicestershire, England (christened on the 29th of that month as the "Sone of Edward Wood," see p. 137 of the Market Harborough Parish Register)." But the data field says April 1633.

Also, if we confirm this information, I'll submit a correction to FindAGrave which gives the birth info: "12 Sep 1633 Willenhall, Metropolitan Borough of Coventry, West Midlands, England (but with the same parents).

posted by M Cole
Barry, nice updated narrative. Thank you. FYI, we avoid (like the plague-- or should I say like Covid-19?) the Millennium File as a source. It's a horrid thing and should never be referenced. (Neither should US/Intl Family Index and its variants.) See https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Puritan_Great_Migration_Project_Reliable_Sources#Unreliable_Sources
posted by Jillaine Smith
Ah, I see what you did there. Never mind.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Contrary to popular belief, Thomas Wood was not born in Nuneaton. The family had moved away from Nuneaton well before then. You can search the Nuneaton Parish Register with the most powerful magnifying glass, ultraviolet light, or whatever, and not find his christening in that Register - because he wasn't christened there. Also I take issue with the statement in the "research notes" section, that Ann (________) Wood could have been born a Todd. We know from Mary Grant's will and a few allusions by Thomas Wood that Susanna (wife of John Todd) and Ann (wife of Thomas Wood) were sisters, but there's no basis for supposing that Todd was their maiden name.
posted by Barry Wood
Thank you for catching that Barry. I've corrected it.
posted by Anne B
Am curious to know where they moved to and if there's any good documentation for this.
posted by Sara (Stevens) Patton
Sorry to be very slow noticing your question. Probably you have found the answer long before now. But in brief, I found the christening entries for the post-Obadiah and pre-Tabitha children at Market Harborough. I would have found them earlier, but a confused person had erroneously indexed them by an imagined surname of "Baker," not realizing that the reference to "Thomas Wood Baker" was about Mr. Wood, the professional baker, and not to someone with a surname of Baker. Edward Wood was Church Warden at Market Harborough, so we have his very confident signature on a page of the parish register, certifying its accuracy. There can be no doubt of the identity of this baker of Nuneaton and Market Harborough with the immigrant to New England Edward Wood, baker of Charlestown. Among other things, he assigned an apprenticeship contract for a young man of Little Bowden, Leicestershire. Little Bowden is just half a mile, across the River Welland, from Market Harborough.
posted by Barry Wood
Is it known what ship (Name?) this Thomas Wood sailed to New England?
posted by James Wood
No. To my knowledge, there is no surviving passenger list at all for any vessel sailing from Britain to New England in 1639. The one exception, if you can call it that, is that a list of passengers in the St. John, which sailed from London in May, 1639 and arrived at New Haven, Conn. in July, has been reconstructed based on the names of those who signed the Plantation Covenant upon their arrival. Obviously Edward Wood was not among those. And there's no reason why he would have been on that ship anyway, considering that the New Haven planters were substantially all from Kent and the adjacent counties. However, the gap between the date when Edward's last child born in England was christened and the date of his purchase of the Charlestown bakery from William Brackenbury is a small one, and Ruth would have needed time to recover from Lidia's birth. Accordingly, the Wood family must have sailed on a boat leaving England in the first half of 1639. I'm going to posit a likely embarkation in April and arrival in Boston/Charlestown in June. I would imagine that he they left from London, but the journey from Market Harborough to Bristol to catch a boat across the ocean would have been only a bit longer, so that's another possibility. Ditto with Southampton. More later.
posted by Barry Wood
So I read everyone's post starting at the bottom of the page and by the time I got to Brad Stauf' post just below I thought i was going to burst a vein going back and forth thinking I was crazy because both sides looked correct...then Brad comes along and neatens it all up. Thank you Brad!
Uploaded the Ancestry of Eva Belle Kempton part 3 referencing Wood. Supposedly the Ruth Mousall and Lee confusion is addressed in Vol 9 of The Genealogist by Delorey (uploaded) in this way: Ruth the daughter of Edward Wood & Ruth Lee was raised by the Mousall family after her parents died. She was addressed as "my daughter Ruth Wood" in the 13 Apr 1657 will of Ralph Mousall (original page 98 of the upload and see partial text of the will here https://sites.rootsweb.com/~celiadon/ps01/ps01_175.htm).

In any case the Edward Wood / Ruth Lee marriage is proved by Nuneaton parish register, one of the readable pages uploaded to Edward and Ruth's profile.

posted by Brad Stauf
Wood-27049 and Wood-145 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents. Use vitals on 145 which are sourced.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Wood-27049 and Wood-145 are not ready to be merged because: Something is not quite right here. Thomas' mother was Ruth Mousall. See http://www.devintimber.org/getperson.php?personID=I4991&tree=dt001. "Ruth Lee-Ward of Mousall" just doesn't seem supportable. Her father was deacon Ralph Mousall and they were from Norwich, not Mousall. I think this is probably a mistake that got into the mix through and overly merged file. Can we get Ruth cleaned up on both files first?
posted by Richard Draper
Richard -- I imagine that by now you have gotten over the mistaken impression that Thomas Wood's birth mother was "Ruth Mousall." It was his little sister Ruth (Jr.) who was raised by the Mousalls after her parents died. Ruth (Lee) Wood, wife of Edward Wood and mother of Thomas Wood, was the daughter of Michael Lee (christening recording in one of the least legible parts of the Nuneaton register).
posted by Barry Wood
Wood-27049 and Wood-145 appear to represent the same person because: Same vitals
posted by Jillaine Smith
I agree Rowley VR p. 431 lists these marriages, it looks like someone accidentally transcribed the LN of the wife of the 2nd listed marriage of a Thomas Wood.

Wood, Thomas, and Ann –––––, 7: 4m: 1654.* Wood, Thomas, and Mary Hunt, June 26, 1683.

posted by Chris Hoyt
I think we should change his wifes name to Ann Unknown
posted by Anne B
Ruth Mousall is CLAIMED to be wife of Edward Wood, not Thomas. And I still see no real documentation for his parents. Findagrave, Millennium Files, American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI), Family Data Collection, US and International Marriage Records, DAR and SAR records are not considered valid sources as most are not based on documented evidence. There many Thomas Woods in English records born around the same time but nothing to prove which one is the one who settled in Rowley, MA. We need to see a will, baptismal or deed records linking the father with sons Thomas and Obediah (since Thomas names Obediah Wood as his brother in his own will.)
posted by Sara (Stevens) Patton
My devious method for finding Thomas Wood in England was through Obadiah. As you noted, there were "many Thomas Woods in English records born around the same time" [as Thomas was born per the age noted for him when he gave his deposition in Mass.]. However, the IGI (this was about 40 years ago, prior to the creation of familysearch) had only one listing for an "Obadiah Wood." Well, it was for "Obedia" Wood, but close enough. That got me to Nuneaton. Then MANY years later I found Thomas' christening at Market Harborough. Janet Delorey, in her otherwise excellent article in The Genealogist, attributed the lack of christening entries for the younger children to the poor condition of the Nuneaton register, not realizing that Edward & family had decamped to Leicestershire.
posted by Barry Wood
re. Ruth Mousall: This looks like good data: http://waltervanness.com/Mayflower-o/p33.htm
posted by Richard Draper