no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Charles Yancey III (abt. 1678 - aft. 1745)

Charles Yancey III
Born about in New Kent, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Brother of
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 67 in Hanover, Virginiamap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Hans Nielsen private message [send private message] and Mike Yancey private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Dec 2011
This page has been accessed 5,187 times.

Contents

Biography

U.S. Southern Colonies Project logo
Charles Yancey III was a Virginia colonist.

Charles III was born about 1675-78, maybe Louisa County, Virginia. (Would have been Hanover County then. Louisa County was formed from part of Hanover in 1742.)

He was the probably the son of Charles Yancey II & Mary Leighton.

He probably married Mary Bartlett, June 14, 1704, King William County, Va.

He passed away about 1745, probably Hanover County.

From Yancey Family Genealogy

accessed 18 Jan 2017 by Gene Brooks-8641

"Returning to the Charles Yancey found living in King William County, Virginia in 1704. It would seem that this same Charles Yancey married and continued living in what was later to be Hanover and Louisa counties with his wife and children. (Hanover County was formed from New Kent and King William Counties in 1720 and Louisa County was formed from part of Hanover in 1742.)

Various genealogical reports record the wife of this Charles as a Miss (Mary?) Bartlett; the International Genealogical Index [IGI] records them as being married 14 January, 1704 in King William County but no verification of this has been found.

Family tradition has it that Charles of King William County was the son of an earlier Charles Yancey and wife, Miss (Mary?) Leighton - thought to be a descendant of the Scotch divine Alexander Leighton (cruelly persecuted for his religious teachings). Various reports have recorded birth, marriage, and death dates for these two Charles' - none of which have been documented and years of research have not produced any evidence proving (or even supporting) the above information concerning the two Charles and such information should not be considered as fact until proven as such. If a group of Yancey brothers did come to Virginia in 1642 as lore has it - the Charles recorded on the Quit Rent Rolls was probably either a son or more probably a grandson of one of the immigrant brothers.

This same Charles Yancey (of King William County) is recorded as owning land in 1722 that was later to be part of Louisa county between North Anna and Little River.

Between 1725 and 1730 he received land grants from King George II entitling him to 448 acres of land in Hanover county. Rather recently documents were discovered that recorded Charles and his wife and seven sons: James, Richard, Charles, Robert, John, Jechonias, and Archelaus living in Hanover county in the mid 1730's. Documents record him deeding land to his son James in 1734 and in 1735 to his son Archelaus. The latest recorded date that Charles is known to have been living is in 1745 when he deeded a negro slave to his son Robert.

Contrary to some reports, no extant will has been found of this Charles Yancey of Hanover and it would seem that he died sometime soon after the deed of 1745."


Hanover Co., VA Court Record Book 1733 - 1735

Page 186 & 187

I, Charles Yancey, of Saint Martin's Parish for the fatherly love.. do grant unto my loving son, James Yancey, my plantation where he now liveth with 125 acres adjoining the plantation being in the upper part of Saint Martin's Parish at Stephen Pettus' corner John Garland, deceased Edward Garland, deceased.

Witnesses: A. (?) Terry and William Burrus.

Deed acknowledged and admitted to record (6 February 1734).


Page 293 & 294

I, Charles Yancey, of Saint Martin's Parish especially for the goodwill and fatherly love do give unto my loving son Archelaus Yancey.. my land and plantation which joins to my son, James' land and above a branch called Horsepen Branch and within the line of Edward Garland, deceased, and Samuel Saxon and John Morris... in Saint Matin's Parish 211 acres.

Witnesses:
Robert Harris,
Charles Higgason and
Christopher Butler.

Deed acknowledged and admitted to record (7 August 1735).


He died probably soon after 1745.

The latest recorded date that Charles is known to have been living is in 1745 when he deeded a negro slave to his son Robert

Research Notes

Dennis Yancey (YanceyFamilyGenealogy) and FamilySearch.org seem to point to there NOT being a sibling named 'Sterling Yancey'. (Mike Y, 10/2018)

Sources

FamilySearch:
Charles Yancey LK5T-S12
birth: 1678
death: 1745, Louisa Co. VA
father: Charles Yancey LVGC-KNX
mother: Mary Leighton LDYF-TKK
spouse: Mary Bartlett G7KT-SQJ

  • Len Holmes, firsthand knowledge. Click the Changes tab for the details of edits by Len and others.
  • WikiTree profile Yancey-164 created through the import of Newsom.ged on Nov 6, 2012 by Hans Nielsen. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Hans and others.




Is Charles your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Charles by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Charles:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Yancey-310 and Yancey-124 appear to represent the same person because: Since this merge was incorrectly rejected, I'll better explain. Yancey-310 has an impossible birth date such that the father is younger than the children and the birth date is later than the death date. Thus, this date should be completely ignored in the merge. If you check the dates for Charles' children Robert and Archelaus (note that this second name is very rare) you'll notice that they closely correspond and should also be merged. This file has the best description I've found of the relationship between Charles and his sons (Robert and Archelaus are both mentioned):

http://www.juch.org/myancestors/aqwg12.asp To quote it: "Charles Yancey was born 1678 in St Martins Parish, Hanover Co., VA. He died 1749 in Hanover Co., VA. Charles married Mary Bartlett on 14 Jan 1704/1705 in King William Co., VA." This should be a good guide for Charles' merge. I placed additional references in the Sources section of Yancey-124.

posted by Bill Brooks
Yancey-124 and Yancey-310 do not represent the same person because: Dates don't match
posted by Hans Nielsen
Yancey-124 and Yancey-310 appear to represent the same person because: They have the same relatives.
posted by Bill Brooks

Y  >  Yancey  >  Charles Yancey III

Categories: New Kent, Virginia | Hanover, Virginia | Virginia Colonists