Fact: Oath Allegiance (1777) Pittsylvania County, Virginia, United States
Sources
↑ Yates-2023 was created by Rick Watts through the import of RickWatts.ged on Jun 11, 2014. This comment and citation can be deleted after the biography has been edited and primary sources are included.
Source: S0002 Title: Brøderbund WFT Vol. 2, Ed. 1, Tree #6253, Date of Import: Dec 31, 1995 Abbreviation: Brøderbund WFT Vol. 2, Ed. 1, Tree #6253, Date of Import: Dec 31, 1995 Data Changed: Date: 25 NOV 2011 Time: 07:15:02
Notes
No NOTE record found with id NI307.
Is Stephen your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Stephen by comparing test results with other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Stephen:
It's clear now. Stephen Yates of this profile, of Pittsylvania, who owned Yates Tavern, father of Samuel who also ran the tavern and others, was NOT a brother of William Yates, Thomas Yates, and James Yates, the three Yates brothers who went from Caswell NC to Robertson Tn. The Y-DNA profiles of paternal-line descendants show that Stephen and Thomas were NOT related paternally, at least not within a thousand years.
One source named 'Miss Kilgore' as the wife of John Yates and mother of the 3 brothers who went to Robertson Tn. This appears to be the only source for her. She should not be linked to this Stephen Yates, either. (Indeed, I can find no evidence that her first name was Elizabeth. Due to conflating John Yates, father of the brothers who went to Robertson Tn, and John Yates of Dan River, whose widow was Elizabeth __, 'Elizabeth Kilgore' was made, or so it appears.)
I will edit this profile to remove the three links (Elizabeth Kilgore, Thomas Yates, William Yates) in a few days unless the profile manager offers a reason to preserve the links. No other profiles are linked to this profile currently.
Hi John! Could you please provide the Y-DNA information? With Y DNA the certainty of paternity needs to be taken into account also, so I am interested to know the Y genotype and genetic distance. It is easier to prove with Y DNA and genetic distances greater than 4 than it is to disprove. I am not trying to argue the point, I would just like to see the evidence and it is not obvious without Y DNA test takers being linked to this profile.
Actually, it's the other way around. Say Stephen Yates and Thomas Yates were second cousins. Their Y-37 profiles would probably be identical, or would certainly be close, were they alive to test. Likewise, their paternal-line descendants today would match closely. All the Y match would show is that Stephen and Thomas were related paternally, not that they were brothers. But we have the opposite result. Their pat-line descendants don't match at all. They differ at 18 of 37 markers in Family Tree's Y-37 test! I doubt that you can find two lines within the broad haplogroup that are more distant than this -- and the M253 group emerged when, at least 6000 years ago? Non-relatedness by Y, in a genealogical sense, is proven here.
Now, an argument might be made that a tester's tree might be wrong and that we need more testers. This isn't the case for Stephen, with several who have tested. It's unlikely the case for Thomas, because the genealogy after him is pretty clear. A second descendant of Thomas will have test results in a few weeks, if you want to wait.
As to DNA tests linked to profiles, we have a problem. I just added profiles down from Stephen Yates to a Y tester, Yates-7020. (I used the other profile for Stephen, Yates-2984, because his children are there.) But Wikitree rules don't allow me to add his test to his profile, even though he is now dec'd. The second descendant of Thomas Yates to test is at WikiTree and will link his Y test to his profile. That test should eventually show up on this profile of Stephen Yates, if the profile isn't changed. That may lead descendants of this Stephen to think that they match by Y to a descendant of Thomas, when if fact they don't. The only way to compare the tests is to join the Yates Surname Project at Family Tree. New privacy setting there make the site difficult or impossible to use though. The only solution may be to report results here in a bio, as matching to what degree, or not.
Thank you. I will dig into your response. I was actually referring to mistaken paternity as why it is more positive than negative. Half-brothers with different fathers would seem to be proven not brothers by Y, but still show their relationship autosomally. And the autosomal DNA relationships become muddy after just a few generations making triangulation required. Many events could occur where a half-sibling is raised as though they are a full sibling including on all the records. So even brother's having different Y does not mean they are not brother's from a genealogical perspective. Whereas if their Y matches perfectly that would be additional supporting evidence for the records.
I am not saying that is what happened here. Just that I want to look at it closer.
Thanks,
Rick
Yates-2984 and Yates-2023 do not represent the same person because: The Yates-2023 profile lists Elizabeth Kilgore as mother, even though the will quoted on her WT page does not name a son Stephen even though it names other children. I have viewed microfilm of that will, and there is no mention of Stephen. Therefore I will not merge Yates-2984 with a profile which has a major error like that.
One source named 'Miss Kilgore' as the wife of John Yates and mother of the 3 brothers who went to Robertson Tn. This appears to be the only source for her. She should not be linked to this Stephen Yates, either. (Indeed, I can find no evidence that her first name was Elizabeth. Due to conflating John Yates, father of the brothers who went to Robertson Tn, and John Yates of Dan River, whose widow was Elizabeth __, 'Elizabeth Kilgore' was made, or so it appears.)
I will edit this profile to remove the three links (Elizabeth Kilgore, Thomas Yates, William Yates) in a few days unless the profile manager offers a reason to preserve the links. No other profiles are linked to this profile currently.
Thank you
Now, an argument might be made that a tester's tree might be wrong and that we need more testers. This isn't the case for Stephen, with several who have tested. It's unlikely the case for Thomas, because the genealogy after him is pretty clear. A second descendant of Thomas will have test results in a few weeks, if you want to wait.
As to DNA tests linked to profiles, we have a problem. I just added profiles down from Stephen Yates to a Y tester, Yates-7020. (I used the other profile for Stephen, Yates-2984, because his children are there.) But Wikitree rules don't allow me to add his test to his profile, even though he is now dec'd. The second descendant of Thomas Yates to test is at WikiTree and will link his Y test to his profile. That test should eventually show up on this profile of Stephen Yates, if the profile isn't changed. That may lead descendants of this Stephen to think that they match by Y to a descendant of Thomas, when if fact they don't. The only way to compare the tests is to join the Yates Surname Project at Family Tree. New privacy setting there make the site difficult or impossible to use though. The only solution may be to report results here in a bio, as matching to what degree, or not.
edited by John Yates
I am not saying that is what happened here. Just that I want to look at it closer. Thanks, Rick