no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Beatrice (Lewknor) Kempe (abt. 1335 - abt. 1388)

Beatrice Kempe formerly Lewknor
Born about in Cuckfield, Sussex, , Englandmap [uncertain]
Daughter of [uncertain] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Mother of and
Died about at about age 53 in Kent, , Englandmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: England Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 12 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 3,644 times.
English flag
Beatrice (Lewknor) Kempe is managed by the England Project.
Join: England Project
Discuss: england

Contents

Biography

Merging Notes

All of the original Beatrice Lewknor profiles' original data was from unsourced Ancestry trees. Dozens of these trees have been checked for sources and none have even a single valid source. A great deal of data has been added since the original profiles were loaded. Some sources have been added but none identify key data relating to Beatrice. Her birth year and place, marriage date/s and place/s and death date and place are not verified by any evidence. The identity of her father is also not identified other than he was Sir Thomas Lewknor and as there were many Thomas Lewknors his actual identity is not yet verified.

There are references to a Beatrice Lewknor, daughter of Sir Thomas Lewknor marrying Ralph Roper and then Thomas Kempe.[1] [2] In some other sources the order is changed. Collins has Beatrice as the widow of Kempe when she married Roper.[3]

The commonality here is the marriage of Beatrice Lewknor to Ralph Roper and a probable marriage to Thomas Kempe. In order to move on and develop the profiles of this family the four Beatrices have now been brought into one. Unsubstantiated information will be progressively removed as documented evidence is found.

There is evidence to connect the Ropers and Kempes in property transactions which is better added after the basics are sorted out.[4]

Beatrice-4 of Gretworth 1335

  • Beatrice Lewknor-4, born 1335 in Gretworth, Northampton to Sir Thomas Lewknor-99, b. say 1310. This Thomas, who fits no other known Thomas' profile, was created to fit the one known fact about Beatrice, based on a 1795 publication, that her father was a Sir Thomas Lewknor. Beatrice was previously shown as also the daughter of Joan D'Oyley-1, b. 1313 who was shown as his daughter in law rather than wife. Joan/1313 may not have existed. Beatrice is married first, say, at age 17 in 1352 to Thomas Kempe and then after his death, in 1359 to Ralph Roper-7, b. 1331 with whom she is mother to Edmund Roper, b. 1360. Beatrice and Thomas Kemp had a son Thomas, who would have been born about 1353, if they were married in 1352.


1359 Second Marriage to Ralph Roper

“The said Thomas Roper has issue Ralph Roper, who, by Beatrix his wife, daughter of Sir Thomas Lewkenor, Knt, and widow of Thomas Kempe, of Wye, had issue Edmund, his son and heir, hereafter mentioned.” [5]

Note on Marriage to Ralph Roper

A 1401 Will leaving a bequest to Ralph Roper[6] shows that he was living at that date, after the death of Beatrice, so that she could not have been his widow when she married Thomas Kempe. If Thomas Kempe died after 1400 and the children of Thomas Kempe and Beatrice were born about 1380, she could not have been Kempe's widow to marry Ralph Roper. Accordingly, Beatrice has been detached as wife of Ralph Roper and her name changed to Kempe.


Sources

  1. Collins, Arthur, and Sir Egerton Brydges. Collins’s Peerage of England; Genealogical, Biographical, and Historical. Vol. VII. London: Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington, Otridge and son, 1812, pp.78-9. Google-Books-ID: zvQ6AAAAIAAJ;
  2. Philipot, John, R. Hovenden, and College of Arms (England and Wales). The Visitation of Kent in 1619-21. London: Harleian Society, 1898, p.82.
  3. Collins, Arthur. Peerage of England, Vol. V 1756, p. 136. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=P5lcAAAAcAAJ Google-Books-ID: P5lcAAAAcAAJ.
  4. Great Britain., and Public Record Office. Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem and Other Analogous Documents Preserved in the Public Record Office. 2nd Series, Vol. 1, 2nd Series, Vol. 1,. London: H.M.S.O., 1898, eg. pp. 122, 159-60.
  5. Arthur Collins. Peerage of England: Containing a Genealogical and Historical Account, etec… London: Third Edition, Volume 5, p. 136, 1795. https://books.google.com/books?id=P5lcAAAAcAAJ&pg=RA1-PA134&lpg=RA1-PA134&dq=Dunstan+%22Ralph+Roper%22&source=bl&ots=7whb8cIf-7&sig=iqoksQHZjiXwDmrCAABZ5RJR8oo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ifuTVfnUGsjGsAXl173gCA&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Dunstan%20%22Ralph%20Roper%22&f=false
  6. Nicolas, N. H. Testamenta Vetusta. Vol. I. Parliament Street, London: Nichols and Son, 1826,pp. 155-56. [1]

See also:

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Lewknor-56 created through the import of Ancestor's that we lost, the Decendants they left behind_2011-08-28_01 (2).ged on Sep 12, 2011 by Willette Bryant.




Is Beatrice your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Beatrice's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
In the Visitation of Kent 1619 (Harleian Soc.) page 81-83 the Roper pedigree shows Beatrix filia Tho. Lewknor married to both Rodolphus Roper and to Tho. Kempe de Wye, (at presumably different times). Is this pedigree wrong?
posted by George Wolf Jr
An Elizabeth Lewknor married a Thomas Kempe on page 95 ( section 8 )

No Beatrice in this pedigree I don’t think but I might have missed her https://archive.org/details/sussexarchaeolo13socigoog/page/n121/mode/1up?view=theater

posted by Ann Browning
Planning to detach Beatrice as spouse for Ralph Roper because the same Beatrice can't be the spouse of both men.
posted by Lois (Hacker) Tilton
Lewknor-68 and Lewknor-4 appear to represent the same person because: see merging notes
posted by Vivienne Caldwell
Lewknor-56 and Lewknor-4 appear to represent the same person because: See merging notes on profiles
posted by Vivienne Caldwell
Lewknor-68 was connected as spouse of both father & son - now disconnected from son Thomas Kemp-1445 - this may have been the correct connection however profile remains as spouse of Thomas Kemp-1446 until further research noted
posted by Valerie Willis