no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Guy Akard (1913 - 1970)

Guy Akard
Born in Delta County, Texas, USAmap
Ancestors ancestors
Brother of and [private brother (1920s - 1950s)]
Husband of — married 15 Aug 1936 in Hugo, Choctaw, Oklahoma, USAmap
Husband of — married 1 Nov 1947 in Waco, McLennan, Texas, USAmap
[children unknown]
Died at age 56 in Waco, McLennan, Texasmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Dee Akard private message [send private message]
Profile last modified
This page has been accessed 67 times.

Contents

Biography

Guy Akard. [1][2][3][4][5][6]

Born 8 AUG 1913. Delta County, Texas, USA. Map: Latitude: N33.3866. Longitude: W95.6744. [7][8][9][10]

Died 14 JUL 1970. Waco, McLennan, Texas. [11]

Buried Waco Memorial Park South. 16 JUL 1970. Waco, McLennan, Texas.

Residence 346 Bonham Street. 1936 Paris, Lamar, Texas. [12] 17 APR 1930. Paris, Lamar, Texas. [13] 10 JAN 1920. Cooper, Delta, Texas. [14] His 2nd enlistment into the U.S. Army. 15 JUL 1942. Waco, McLennan, Texas. [15] 1 APR 1940. Waco, McLennan, Texas, USA. Map: Latitude: N31.5493. Longitude: W97.1467. [16] 1935 Lamar County, Texas, USA. Map: Latitude: N33.6672. Longitude: W95.5702. [17]

Note: #N787.

Notes

Note N787The Waco News-Tribune Wednesday, July 15, 1970, page 4A [photo of Guy Akard] Ex-Waco Detective Dies Here Funeral arrangements are pending at Connally Funeral Home for retired Waco Police Department Detective. Mr. Akard died early Tuesday in a local hospital. He was 56. Mr. Akard retired in 1963 because of an illness after more than 20 years in the police department. He was born at Charleston and came to Waco in 1939. He joined the police force March 1, 1939. He left the department to work for the Waco Fire Department for a short time in 1941. Mr. Akard served in World War II as a second lieutenent in the U.S. Army. He was discharged in 1944 and rejoined the staff of the police department here. He was with the force until his retirement. He married the former Miss Theresa Quiram in 1947. Survivors are his wife and several nieces and nephews. --------------------- File Unit Title: Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, ca. 1938 - 1946 Data Table: ENLISTMENT RECORDS Member of: Record Group 64: Records of the National Archives and Records Administration; Series: World War II Army Enlistment Records, 6/1/2002 - 9/302002 ARMY SERIAL NUMBER 38118921 NAME AKARD, GUY RESIDENCE: STATE 85 TEXAS RESIDENCE: COUNTY 309 MC LENNAN PLACE OF ENLISTMENT 8536 DALLAS TEXAS DATE OF ENLISTMENT DAY 15 DATE OF ENLISTMENT MONTH 07 DATE OF ENLISTMENT YEAR 42 GRADE: ALPHA DESIGNATION PVT# Private GRADE: CODE 8 Private BRANCH: ALPHA DESIGNATION BI# Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA BRANCH: CODE 00 Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA FIELD USE AS DESIRED # TERM OF ENLISTMENT 5 Enlistment for the duration of the War or other emergency, plus six months, subject to the discretion of the President or otherwise according to law LONGEVITY ### SOURCE OF ARMY PERSONNEL 2 Enlisted Man, Regular Army, after 3 months of Discharge NATIVITY 85 TEXAS YEAR OF BIRTH 13 RACE AND CITIZENSHIP 1 White, citizen EDUCATION 5 1 year of college CIVILIAN OCCUPATION 266 DISPATCHER CLERK (CREW) or POLICEMAN or INVESTIGATOR (Detective.) or CRIMINAL IDENTIFICATION LABORATORY TECHNICIAN or VICE SQUAD PATROLMAN or TRAFFIC PATROLMAN MARITAL STATUS 2 Married COMPONENT OF THE ARMY 7 Selectees (Enlisted Men) CARD NUMBER # BOX NUMBER 1290 FILM REEL NUMBER 6.56# Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco. CITY OF WACO et al. v. AKARD et al. No. 3063. Oct. 23, 1952. Rehearing Denied Nov. 13, 1952. Suit to set aside promotions of two city policemen to the grade of sergeants from an eligibility list declared by the city Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission after examinations and for a mandatory injunction requiring the Commission, civil service director, and police chief to remove the promoted policemen from their new positions and compelling the commission to give another promotional examination. From a judgment of the District Court, McLennan County, R. B. Stanford, J., setting aside the Commission's findings, substituting the court's findings, and granting a mandatory injunction authorized plaintiffs to require the Commission and the city officials to put the court's findings into effect, dependants appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals, Tirey, A. J., held that the trial court had no jurisdiction to hear plaintiff's appeal from the Commission's findings and hence had no authority to substitute the court's findings and grant the mandatory injunction. Judgment reversed, injunction vacated and dissolved, and cause dismissed. West Headnotes [1] Injunction 81 212k81 Most Cited Cases [1] Municipal Corporations 184.1 268k184.1 Most Cited Cases (Formerly 268k184(5)) An application filed with city civil service commission after expiration of eligibility list for promotions of city policemen to grade of sergeants, for public hearing to set aside list, came too late, and commission had no authority to correct list, so that district court was without jurisdiction to hear petitioners' appeal from commission's findings on petition, and hence had no authority to substitute court's findings and grant mandatory injunction requiring commission and city police chief to remove promoted policemen from their sergeants' positions and compelling commission to give another promotional examination. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 1269m, § 14, subd. E. [2] Injunction 114(2) 212k114(2) Most Cited Cases [2] Municipal Corporations 184.1 268k184.1 Most Cited Cases (Formerly 268k184(5)) City policemen, filing no complaint with city civil service commission concerning eligibility list declared thereby for promotions to positions of sergeants during year while list was in force and two other policemen thereon were promoted to such positions, in which no vacancies remained, had no right to petition district court to set aside promotions and issue mandatory injunction requiring commission and police chief to remove promoted officers and compelling commission to give another promotional examination, as petitioners, who were not suspended or aggrieved, had no justiciable interest in subject matter. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 1269m, § 16a. [3] Action 13 13k13 Most Cited Cases To seek relief in court of justice, one must have a justiciable interest in subject matter of suit. [4] Action 6 13k6 Most Cited Cases Courts do not sit to decide mere abstract questions of law. [5] Injunction 81 212k81 Most Cited Cases [5] Municipal Corporations 218(3) 268k218(3) Most Cited Cases (Formerly 268k218(9)) A trial court, having jurisdiction of appeal from city civil service commission's orders, has no authority to substitute court's findings for those of commission and put substituted findings into effect by means of mandatory injunction. [6] Injunction 128(7) 212k128(7) Most Cited Cases (Formerly 212k128) [6] Municipal Corporations 184.1 268k184.1 Most Cited Cases (Formerly 268k184(5)) In suit to set aside promotions of two city policemen to grade of sergeants and detectives in classification system established by city ordinance pursuant to statutory authority and for mandatory injunction requiring city civil service commission and police chief to remove promoted officers from their new positions and compelling commission to give another promotional examination, findings of jury and court that transfer of a sergeant to position of detective was a promotion was erroneous as contrary to undisputed evidence, as neither jury nor court had authority to change ordinance placing sergeants and detectives in same class. [7] Municipal Corporations 184(2) 268k184(2) Most Cited Cases One classified in city police department grade of patrolmen by city ordinance for over ten years before his resignation from department and again serving as patrolman for almost two years after taking another entrance examination and rejoining department until immediately before date of his examination for promotion to position of sergeant was not precluded from taking such examination under Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Act, purpose of which is to enable cities to have more efficient personnel. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 1269m, § 14. *497 Lyndon Olson, City Atty., Wiley W. Stem, Jr., W. H. White, Ass't. City Attys., D. M. Wilson, former City Atty., Waco, for appellant. O'Dowd & O'Dowd, Waco, for appellees. TIREY, Justice. This cause involves the construction and application of a portion of Art. 1269m, Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.Stats., which is the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Act. A statement is necessary. After the City of Waco (a home rule city) adopted the Civil Service Ordinance putting into effect the Civil Service Commission, the City, by proper ordinance, established a classification system for all officers and places of employment in the Fire and Police Departments. Pertinent to this discussion the employees of the Police Department were placed in Grades 1, 2, 3 and 4. Grade 1 provides for 71 positions (which includes foot and motor patrolmen, traffic squad and police matron) and provides that each employee be paid 0 per month. Grade 2 provides for five sergeants and eight detectives and fixes the pay for each at 3.62 per month. Grade 3 provides for one lieutenant of police, one lieutenant of traffic, superintendent of the identification bureau and the chief radio mechanic and fixes the pay for each at 0 per month. Grade 4 provides for two captains and fixes the pay for each at 0 per month. On December 8, 1950, the Commission examined papers given on the examinations for various positions in the Police Department on November 21, 1950, and declared the following eligibility list: In the sergeants' Grade No. 2 we find first, Cornell (2) Eakin, (3) Schober, (4) Farley, (5) Coan, (6) Lucas, and (7) Akard. The other names on the list are not pertinent. Thereafter Cornell and Farley were promoted to Grade 2. Appellees, on the 8th of December, 1951, filed with the Civil Service Commission a notice and application, the effect of which was to complain of the action of the Civil Service Commission in permitting the promotion of policemen Farley and Cornel and asked that the promotions and appointments be set aside; that Farley and Cornell be demoted to their original positions and that a competitive examination be held in accordance with the Civil Service Law for the purpose of establishing an eligibility list. The Commission thereafter had a meeting on December 21, 1951, and entered the following findings, the pertinent parts of which are: 'The Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission after reading and studying the petition filed by Guy Akard et al. on December 8, 1951, makes the following findings and conclusions upon said petition. '1. 'That all of the actions taken by the Director of the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission on the matters mentioned in said petition have been diligently, legally and lawfully performed by Mr. Hubert Dunnam under the direction and with the knowledge of the Firemen's and Policemen's *498 Civil Service Commission. All of the actions taken by the said Director on the matters mentioned in said petition are hereby affirmed and ratified by the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission. '2. 'The Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission further finds that the actions taken by the Chief of Police on the matters mentioned in said petition have been diligently, legally and lawfully performed by the Chief of Police in compliance with the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service law and according to the rules and regulations of the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission. All of the actions taken by the Chief of Police on the matters mentioned in said petition are hereby affirmed and ratified by the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission. '3. 'That the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission after duly considering the allegations contained in the above mentioned petition is of the opinion and so finds that said petition is a request for an interpretation of Article 1269m of the Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas and of the rules and regulations of the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission of the City of Waco, Texas, and since all of the acts of the Director of the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission and the acts of the Chief of Police complained of were done in accordance with the interpretation of said laws and rules by said Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission, the Firemen's and Policemen's Civil Service Commission of the City of Waco does not see any necessity for a new and further interpretation of said law and rules at this time.' Thereafter, appellees, on December 28, 1951, filed their original petition on which they went to trial. It covers 28 pages in the transcript. Pertinent to this discussion the effect of appellees' petition was to complain of the action of the Civil Service Commission to permit the promotion of Farley and Cornell and they asked that the promotions be set aside, that Farley and Cornell be demoted to their original positions of policemen, and that the court issue a mandatory injunction requiring the Civil Service Commission, the Director of Civil Service, and the Chief of Police to remove Farley and Cornell from the sergeants' and detectives' positions and reassign them to Grade 1 and compel the Civil Service Commission to give another promotional examination as required by law. Appellants seasonably presented pleas in abatement and motion for instructed verdict, each of which was overruled, and the court submitted the cause to the jury. The jury in its verdict found substantially: (a) that the transfer of a sergeant to a detective was a promotion; (b) that plaintiffs, by their failure to act on such transfers, were not guilty of laches; (c) that the Civil Service Commission, in reaching its decision on December 21, 1951, acted arbitrarily, unreasonably and capriciously. The decree of the court set aside the findings of the Civil Service Commission and substituted its findings for the findings of the Commission, and on the verdict of the jury and the court's findings entered its decree and granted a mandatory injunction authorizing plaintiffs to require the Civil Service Commission and the city officials of the City of Waco to put into effect the court's findings. The decree covers eight pages in the transcript. Appellants seasonably perfected their appeal to this court. Since we are of the view that appellees' petition failed to state a cause of action and the further view that the trial court was without any authority to hear appellees' appeal from the findings of the Civil Service Commission and was without authority to substitute its findings for the findings of the Commission, a statement in detail of the findings and the decree of the court would be of no avail. [1] Appellants' first point is: 'Art. 1269m, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, precludes the appeal pursued by appellees.' We sustain this contention. *499 Section 14, subd. E of said Article provides in part: 'All eligibility lists shall remain in existence for one (1) year unless exhausted, and at the expiration of one (1) year they shall be destroyed and new examinations be given.' It is clear that the above eligibility list here under attack expired at midnight, December 7, 1951, by operation of law. Since such list expired at midnight, December 7, 1951, under the express terms of the statute, such list became a nullity. Needless to say that appellees' application filed with the Commission on December 8, 1951, asking for a public hearing before said Commission to set aside such eligibility list that had expired by operation of law, came too late. Perforce of the statute, the Civil Service Commission was without any authority to make any correction of said eligibility list if it had been illegally created, because its life had been extinguished by operation of the statute. In order to create another eligibility list, the Civil Service Commission must start over again and give new examinations. Since the eligibility list expired by operation of law and the Civil Service Commission was without authority to make any changes therein, the district court likewise was without authority or jurisdiction to hear any complaint about an eligibility list that had expired by operation of law. [2][3][4] Section 16a of Art. 1269m, supra, is applicable and controlling here. It provides: 'It is hereby declared that the purpose of the Firemen and Policemen's Civil Service Law is to secure to the cities affected thereby efficient Police and Fire Departments, composed of capable personnel, free from political influence, and with permanent tenure of employment as public servants. The members of the Civil Service Boards are hereby directed to administer the civil service law in accordance with this purpose; and when sitting as a board of appeals for a suspended or aggrieved employee, they are to conduct such hearing fairly and impartially under the provisions of this law, and are to render a fair and just decision, considering only the evidence presented before them in such hearing.' Neither of the appellees has been suspended or aggrieved Each of them was an employee of the Police Department in the grade in which they had been employed. It is true that appellee Akard's name was seventh on the eligibility list that was prepared on December 8, 1950, but only four men had been promoted from Grade 1 to Grade 2, and Nos. 5 and 6 were in line for promotion ahead of Akard, so appellees were before the Civil Service Commission asserting a complaint that had not accrued during the life of the eligility list and under which Farley and Cornell had been appointed. No complaint had been filed with the Commission concerning such eligibility list during the time it was in force, and the City of Waco, acting upon the findings of the Civil Service Commission, had made the promotions of Cornell and Farley from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Under the express terms of the statute, appellees stood before the Civil Service Commission without any eligibility whatsoever to be considered for promotion from Grade 1 to Grade 2, and the Civil Service Commission was powerless to make another eligibility list without giving new examinations and proceeding according to law, and besides there was no vacancy in Grade 2. So appellees were before the Civil Service Commission and the trial court without a justiciable during the life of the eligibility list and courts have steadfastly adhered to the legal principle that in order for one to seek relief in a court of justice, he must have a justiciable interest in the subject matter. The promotions that had been made by the city officials of the City of Waco had become effective under an eligibility list that had been in force for the period of one year governing such promotions, and the city officials of the City of Waco alone had authority to suspend or dismiss these mem from their new positions. Needless to say that the statute provides that in the event a policeman is suspended or dismissed from his position, he has a right to be heard under the terms of the statute, but no such controversy is before us here. *500 Appellees were in Grade 1 and before they would be eligible now for promotion to Grade 2 they must have a new examination and must have their names placed on the eligibility list as provided by the statute. Moreover, there were no vacancies in Grade 2. So, under the present state of the record, appellees were before the Commission and the court without a legal complaint. Courts do not sit to decide mere abstract questions of law. See opinion of this court in Davis v. First National Bank of Waco, Tex.Civ.App., 145 S.W.2d 707, at page 711, affirmed by 139 Tex. 36, 161 S.W.2d 467, 144 A.L.R. 1. See also cases collated in Vol. 23, words & Phrases, Justiciable Interests. We think we should say that our Supreme Court has recently rendered two very important decisions construing this pertinent statute. See City of Amarillo v. Hancock, Tex.Sup., 239 S.W.2d 788, and Glass v. Smith, Tex.Sup., 244 S.W.2d 645. These cases reflect the most recent views of the Supreme Court and they should be studied and followed in causes arising under this statute. [5] We think we should also say that no principle of law is better settled by our Supreme Court than that in cases where a trial court has appellate jurisdiction from the orders of the Civil Service Commission or an administrative agency, the trial court has no authority to substitute his findings for the findings of the Commission, and that such court necessarily would have no authority to put such findings into effect by means of a mandatory injunction. See Lone Star Gas Co. v. State, 137 Tex. 279, 153 S.W.2d 681; Trapp v. Shell Oil Co., 145 Tex. 323, 198 S.W.2d 424; City of San Angelo v. Boehme Bakery, 144 Tex. 281, 190 S.W.2d 67; Texas Consolidated Theatres v. Pittillo, 204 S.W.2d 396 (by this court); Montgomery v. City of Dallas, 245 S.W.2d 753 (by this court, er, ref.); Fire Dept. of City of Fort Worth v. City of Fort Worth, 147 Tex. 505, 217 S.W.2d 664. [6] Notwithstanding the views heretofore expressed dispose of this cause, we think we should make the following statement: The finding of the jury as well as the finding of the court that the transfer of a sergeant to a detective was a promotion is without any support in the evidence and violates and contradicts the undisputed evidence on this matter. The City of Waco, by ordinance, established a classification system, and Grade 2 placed sergeants and detectives in the same class and fixed their pay on the same basis. Neither the jury nor the court had authority to change the city ordinance in this behalf. That power is peculiarly lodged with the Board of Commissioners of the City of Waco and it cannot be taken away from this body by judicial order and any attempt to do so is void. Our Supreme Court in Glass v. Smith, 244 S.W.2d 645, in an opinion handed down on October 28, 1951, expressly held that the legislature itself had declared the classifications should be provided by ordinance of the City Council and that the City Council in the aldermanic form of government and the City Commission in the commission form of government have always been the primary repository of legislative powers in this state. Since they City of Waco by ordinance pursuant to authority of the legislature fixed the grades of its employees, neither the jury nor the trial court had authority to change these grades and classifications. Since a sergeant and detective are in the same grade under the terms of the ordinance, it would indeed severely handicap the Police Department if the Chief of Police, charged with the duty of supervising and handling his force, could not assign the sergeant of a detective's duty or a detective to a sergeant's duty, if he thought the best interests of the safety and welfare of the city demanded it. Neither the statute nor the ordinance makes such restrictions upon he authority of the Chief of Police and we find no authority for the trial court to limit the authority of the Chief of Police by a court order in this behalf, and the trial court's attempt to do so is void. [7] We think J. D. Farley had complied with Section 14 of Article 1269m, supra. The record is without dispute that Farley complied with the first provision of *501 the section, and that he was classified in Grade 1 of the department for a period in excess of ten years; that he resigned from the department and was gone for approximately six months and then took another entrance examination and rejoined the department; that Farley, in this last period of duty, served for a period of almost two years, lacking only eight days of service, immediately preceding the date of the promotional examination that he took for sergeant. Without going into a discussion, such action of the Commission was not in conflict with the first provision of Section 14 of the Article applicable, and we think the last part of the section is merely directory. Our courts have been very liberal in the construction of all those statutes dealing with labor, where a time element has been involved, and have never interposed a harsh construction or restriction thereon. The whole purpose of the Act is to enable our cities to have a more efficient personnel and in view of the fact that Farley had had some ten years previous, uninterrupted service as a policeman in Grade 1, it would indeed have been a harsh rule to preclude him from taking an examination for promotion because of his factual situation. See Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Bullard, Tex.Civ.App., 128 S.W.2d 126, 133, 134; Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. Clack, 134 Tex. 151, 132 S.W.2d 399, 401. Since it was the Civil Service Commission's duty to act under the law governing the matters here, it is our view that its decision on December 21, 1951 was not arbitrary; neither was it unreasonable or capricious, and its action was authorized by law. Since the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal, it necessarily follows that the court was without authority to substitute its findings for the findings of the Commission and grant the mandatory injunction or any other relief. Since the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear the appellees' complaint, the decree entered by the court becomes a nullity and must be set aside and the injunction granted must be vacated and dissolved. See City of Amarillo v. Hancock, supra. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, the injunction granted vacated and dissolved, and the cause dismissed. LESTER, C. J., took no part in the consideration and disposition of this case. 252 S.W.2d 496 END OF DOCUMENT.

External Files

  • File M1211. File: C:\Users\Dee A. Welborn\Documents\Family Tree Maker\Glenell Dee Akard Ancestors_2017-05-07 Media20 United States Federal Census-144.jpg. Format: jpg. 1920 United States Federal Census. Year: 1920; Census Place: Cooper, Delta, Texas; Roll: T625_1795; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 48; Image: 695.
  • File M2513. File: C:\Users\Dee A. Welborn\Documents\Family Tree Maker\Glenell Dee Akard Ancestors_2017-05-07 Media30 United States Federal Census-365.jpg. Format: jpg. 1930 United States Federal Census. Year: 1930; Census Place: Paris, Lamar, Texas; Roll: 2367; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 10; Image: 1001.0.
  • File M3165. File: C:\Users\Dee A. Welborn\Documents\Family Tree Maker\Glenell Dee Akard Ancestors_2017-05-07 Media\US City Directories-21.jpg. Format: jpg. U.S. City Directories.
  • File M4732. File: C:\Users\Dee A. Welborn\Documents\Family Tree Maker\Glenell Dee Akard Ancestors_2017-05-07 Media40 United States Federal Census(17).jpg. Format: jpg. 1940 United States Federal Census. Year: 1940; Census Place: Waco, McLennan, Texas; Roll: T627_4100; Page: 22A; Enumeration District: 155-31.

Sources

  1. Source: #S91 Name: Guy Akard Birth Date: 1913 Birth Place: Residence Date: Residence Place: Texas Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=wwiienlist&h=2797605&ti=0&indiv=try
  2. Source: #S135 Year: 1930; Census Place: Paris, Lamar, Texas; Roll: 2367; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 10; Image: 1001.0. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Residence date: 1930 Residence place: Paris, Lamar, Texas File @M2513@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1930usfedcen&h=62333780&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  3. Source: #S80 Residence date: 1936 Residence place: Paris, Texas File @M3165@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=us1890censussubstitute&h=7409928&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  4. Source: #S140 Death date: 14 Jul 1970 Death place: Mc Lennan, Texas Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=txdeath1964&h=529623&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  5. Source: #S139 Year: 1920; Census Place: Cooper, Delta, Texas; Roll: T625_1795; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 48; Image: 695. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Texas Residence date: 1920 Residence place: Cooper, Delta, Texas File @M1211@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1920usfedcen&h=109380968&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  6. Source: #S194 Year: 1940; Census Place: Waco, McLennan, Texas; Roll: T627_4100; Page: 22A; Enumeration District: 155-31 File @M4732@
  7. Source: #S91 Name: Guy Akard Birth Date: 1913 Birth Place: Residence Date: Residence Place: Texas Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=wwiienlist&h=2797605&ti=0&indiv=try
  8. Source: #S135 Year: 1930; Census Place: Paris, Lamar, Texas; Roll: 2367; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 10; Image: 1001.0. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Residence date: 1930 Residence place: Paris, Lamar, Texas File @M2513@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1930usfedcen&h=62333780&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  9. Source: #S139 Year: 1920; Census Place: Cooper, Delta, Texas; Roll: T625_1795; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 48; Image: 695. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Texas Residence date: 1920 Residence place: Cooper, Delta, Texas File @M1211@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1920usfedcen&h=109380968&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  10. Source: #S194 Year: 1940; Census Place: Waco, McLennan, Texas; Roll: T627_4100; Page: 22A; Enumeration District: 155-31 File @M4732@
  11. Source: #S140 Death date: 14 Jul 1970 Death place: Mc Lennan, Texas Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=txdeath1964&h=529623&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  12. Source: #S80 Residence date: 1936 Residence place: Paris, Texas File @M3165@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=us1890censussubstitute&h=7409928&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  13. Source: #S135 Year: 1930; Census Place: Paris, Lamar, Texas; Roll: 2367; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 10; Image: 1001.0. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Residence date: 1930 Residence place: Paris, Lamar, Texas File @M2513@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1930usfedcen&h=62333780&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  14. Source: #S139 Year: 1920; Census Place: Cooper, Delta, Texas; Roll: T625_1795; Page: 13B; Enumeration District: 48; Image: 695. Birth date: abt 1914 Birth place: Texas Residence date: 1920 Residence place: Cooper, Delta, Texas File @M1211@ Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=1920usfedcen&h=109380968&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt
  15. Source: #S91 Name: Guy Akard Birth Date: 1913 Birth Place: Residence Date: Residence Place: Texas Link: http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=wwiienlist&h=2797605&ti=0&indiv=try
  16. Source: #S194 Year: 1940; Census Place: Waco, McLennan, Texas; Roll: T627_4100; Page: 22A; Enumeration District: 155-31 File @M4732@
  17. Source: #S194 Year: 1940; Census Place: Waco, McLennan, Texas; Roll: T627_4100; Page: 22A; Enumeration District: 155-31 File @M4732@
  • Source: S135 Ancestry.com 1930 United States Federal Census Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: MyFamily.com, Inc., 2002.Original data - United States of America, Bureau of the Census. Fifteenth Census of the United States, 1930. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1930. T626, 2,667 rol; Repository: #R1
  • Repository: R1 Ancestry.com
  • Source: S139 Ancestry.com 1920 United States Federal Census Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: MyFamily.com, Inc., 2005. For details on the contents of the film numbers, visit the following NARA web page: NARA. Note: Enumeration Districts 819-839 on roll 323 (Chicago City.Original data - United States of America; Repository: #R1
  • Source: S140 Ancestry.com Texas Death Index, 1903-2000 Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: MyFamily.com, Inc., 2006.Original data - Texas Department of Health. Texas Death Indexes, 1903-2000. Austin, TX, USA: Texas Department of Health, State Vital Statistics Unit.Original data: Texas Department of Health. Te; Repository: #R1
  • Source: S194 Ancestry.com 1940 United States Federal Census Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012.Original data - United States of America, Bureau of the Census. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1940. T627; Repository: #R1
  • Source: S80 Ancestry.com U.S. City Directories Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2008.Original data - Original sources vary according to directory. The title of the specific directory being viewed is listed at the top of the image viewer page. Check the directory titl; Repository: #R1
  • Source: S91 National Archives and Records Administration U.S. World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946 Publication: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2005.Original data - Electronic Army Serial Number Merged File, 1938-1946 [Archival Database]; World War II Army Enlistment Records; Records of the National Archives and Records Administra; Repository: #R1





Is Guy your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Guy by comparing test results with other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Guy:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.

A  >  Akard  >  Guy Akard