John (Alcott) Alcox II
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John (Alcott) Alcox II (1705 - 1777)

John Alcox II formerly Alcott aka Alcott, Alcock
Born in Newhaven Towne, New Haven, Connecticut Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 14 Jan 1729 in North Haven, New Haven, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 71 in Wolcott, New Haven, Connecticut, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Linda Maples private message [send private message] and Raymond Sullivan private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Apr 2011
This page has been accessed 2,073 times.

Biography

John was born on January 14, 1705 in New Haven, Connecticut to John Alcott.[1]

John passed away in 1777.

Sources

  1. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F7WT-R5F : 11 February 2018), John Allcock, 14 Jan 1705; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
    Name John Allcock
    Gender Male
    Birth Date 14 Jan 1705
    Birthplace NEW HAVEN TWP,NEW HAVEN,CONNETICUT
    Father's Name John Allcock
  • Orcutt, Samual. History of the Town of Wolcott (Press of The American Printing Company in Waterbury, Conn, 1874) Page 231
  • Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com : accessed 25 January 2021), memorial page for John Alcox II (14 Jan 1705–6 Jan 1777), Find a Grave Memorial no. 59861964, citing Edgewood Cemetery, Wolcott, New Haven County, Connecticut, USA ; Maintained by Catherine Clemens Sevenau (contributor 47082189) .




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi Maureen,

The original spelling of this family of Alcott's was Alcock (Thomas Alcock and George Alcock were on a ship as part of the 1630 Winthrop Fleet).

As time progressed the Alcock had variants such as Alcox/Allcox and then sometime in the very early 1800's Allcott and then Alcott began to be used.

Supposedly Amos Bronson Alcott and his cousin Dr. William Alcott decided Alcott sounded better than Alcox.

So now I am an Alcott by birth instead of Alcox or Alcock. But that's okay, I'll answer to any of the three.

Linda Alcott Maples

posted by Linda (Alcott) Maples
Alcock-421 and Alcott-52 appear to represent the same person because: Despite the difference in last name they appear to be the same person, same date of birth and death.
posted by Maureen Ahern

Rejected matches › John (alcox) Alcox (1705-1777)

A  >  Alcott  |  A  >  Alcox  >  John (Alcott) Alcox II