no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Amicia (Arden) Bracebridge (1153 - 1210)

Amicia Bracebridge formerly Arden aka de Arden
Born in Warwickshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of and [mother unknown]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 57 in Warwickshire,Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: England Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 24 Mar 2012
This page has been accessed 4,052 times.
English flag
Amicia (Arden) Bracebridge is managed by the England Project.
Join: England Project
Discuss: england

Biography

Amicia de Arden was the last surviving heiress of the Ardens of Kingsbury, Osbert I de Arden, and Osbert II de Arden. Her inheritance passed to her son, John de Bracebridge, and then later to his younger brother William de Bracebridge. Her husband was Peter de Bracebridge.[1][2][3]

Two legal records recorded in 1208 and 1214 prove definitively that the three coheiresses of the Arden family in Kingsbury were daughters of Osbert II de Arden.[4] The three sisters held rights in Kingsbury in this sequence:

  1. Amabil de Arden, wife of Robert Fitz Walter. She apparently died without issue.
  2. Adeliza de Arden, wife of Simon de Harcourt She apparently died without issue.
  3. Amicia de Arden, wife of Peter de Bracebridge. Their sons John, and then William de Bracebridge were the eventual heirs of Osbert.

Also concerning the descent given in the legal case, the historians David Crouch and Ann Williams have argued that, in the words of Williams, Osbert I de Arden was the "the grandson, not the son of Thorkell; his father was Siward of Arden and his mother was probably Siward's wife Cecilia (PRO E13/76 m 71r)."[5] The document they cite is a charter by Hugh de Arden, son of Siward, which names as Osbert de Arden his elder brother. Given the importance of elder brothers, who else could this Osbert be than the one who held Kingsbury?

Research notes

The historian Peter Coss understood the three sisters to be daughters of Osbert I, not granddaughters, but he was apparently unaware of the 1214 legal case, and other similar evidence mentioned above.[6]

Even more confusing, the 17th century antiquarian Dugdale placed the three sisters in various different relationships, and in different generations.[7]


Sources

  1. Coss, Peter R., (1991) Lordship, Knighthood, and Locality: A Study in English Society, c.1180 - c.1280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.281-286.
  2. Coss, (1987) "Knighthood and the Early Thirteenth-Century County Court" Thirteenth Century England II, p.56
  3. 'Parishes: Kingsbury', in A History of the County of Warwick: Volume 4, Hemlingford Hundred, ed. L F Salzman (London, 1947), pp. 100-114. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/warks/vol4/pp100-114 [accessed 27 August 2022].
  4. Curia Regis Rolls, Vol.5, pp.241-2; Vol.7 pp.102-104. Also see the two sequential charters of the first two sisters in Middleton Manuscripts (Historical Manuscripts Commission), pp.8-10. A further source not yet consulted is Cotton Manuscript Appendix XXV 25, referred to by Stenton here and in editorial remarks by Warner and Ellis here.
  5. Ann Williams. (1995) The English and the Norman Conquest. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, p.104
  6. Coss, Peter R. Lordship, Knighthood and Locality : A Study in English Society, c.1180-c.1280. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p.280.
  7. Compare the Kingsbury account to the bigger Arden pedigree under Curdworth, Dugdale, Antiquities of Warwickshire 2nd ed., vol 1, p.925.




Is Amicia your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Amicia's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Good point Andrew, I have removed it.
posted by Vivienne Caldwell
Any special reason she is called a Baroness? Not sure what that would really mean in this period? I think this style would normally imply a parliamentary baron, but I think there was never a "Lord Bracebridge"?
posted by Andrew Lancaster
I propose to move her to being a daughter of Arden-231, her current brother. See sourcing on her current father's article (Arden-72). Anyone see a problem?
posted by Andrew Lancaster
Dugdale appears to have read it wrong. Modern historians make her the daughter of the second Osbert? And the other two ladies were her sisters not nieces?
posted by Andrew Lancaster

A  >  Arden  |  B  >  Bracebridge  >  Amicia (Arden) Bracebridge

Categories: Tamworth, Staffordshire | England Managed Profiles, Pre-1500