no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Matthew Armour (1910)

Matthew Armour
Born in Corowa, New South Wales, Australiamap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 22 Mar 2013
This page has been accessed 252 times.

Biography

Matthew Armour was born in 1910 at Corowa, New South Wales. He was the son of Robert Armour and Agnes. [1]

Sources

  1. NSW Government. Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages. Matthew Armour, Birth. Registration number: 3256/1910, District: Corowa. Father: Robert. Mother: Agnes. Accessed 5 May 2021. Births search page

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Tash McNamara for creating WikiTree profile Armour-92 through the import of Family tree.ged on Mar 21, 2013.

Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Tash and others.






Is Matthew your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Matthew's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Armour-742 and Armour-92 do not represent the same person because: There is no evidence these were the same people. Data has been added to a blank profile to make it look like they are the same.
posted by Chris (Sharp) Macneill
Armour-742 and Armour-92 appear to represent the same person because: Same birth and death details. Armour-92 has no other profiles attached. Thanks for reviewing.
posted by Gillian Thomas
This profile is not ready for merging as already stated twice before in the last week. People have been adding data to a blank profile to make it look like it's a match, but there is no justification for adding the data other than the names match. The original profile creator has never been contacted to determine if they have any more information than when they added the blank profile.

There were two people called Matthew Armour that lived in the same area around the same time with different spouses. So the profile could just as easily be the other Matthew Armour. I think it would be premature to merge without seeking the opinion of the profile creator.

posted by Chris (Sharp) Macneill
Armour-742 and Armour-92 are not ready to be merged because: As already mentioned with an earlier proposed match for these profiles. There were two people named Matthew Armour existing in the same area around the same time with different spouses. Just because someone has added the same wife to both profiles doesn't mean they are the same person.
posted by Chris (Sharp) Macneill
Armour-92 has no other connected relatives and no dates. It makes no difference whether he is the other one or not.
posted by [Living Ford]
Armour-742 and Armour-92 appear to represent the same person because: duplicated profile - same spouse
posted by Peter Jones
Armour-742 and Armour-92 are not ready to be merged because: Whilst there is some evidence these profiles may be one and the same. Nothing available currently proves this beyond doubt. Profiles should remain independent until such time as conclusive evidence comes to light.

Profiles at Familysearch .org appear to have been merged in 2016, but this has created conflicting information for spouses and parents and children.

posted by Chris (Sharp) Macneill

Rejected matches › Matthew Armour (1857-1900)

A  >  Armour  >  Matthew Armour