Born in Taunton, Bristol, Massachusetts
Ancestors 
Daughter of Edward Erasmus Babbitt Sr.
and Sarah (Tarne) Bobbet
Sister of
Myles Tarne Bobet, Edward Bobet Jr., Sarah (Bobet) Blake, Hannah (Bobet) Macomber, Damaris Bobet, Elkanah (Bobet) Babbitt, Elkanah (Babbitt) Bobet, Dorcas Bobet, Esther Bobet and Deliverance (Babbitt) Holloway
Wife of
Samuel Caswell
— married
1701 [location unknown]
Descendants 
Mother of
Ebenezer Caswell and Mehitable (Caswell) Richmond
Died
at age 54
in Massachusetts Bay Colony
Profile last modified
| Created 15 Oct 2014
This page has been accessed 192 times.
Contents |
Biography
Name
Birth
Death
- Death Date: 20 MAR 1726[7]
Marriage
- Husband: Samuel Caswell
- Wife: Ruth Babbit
- Marriage Date: ABT 1701
- Place: America [8]
- Marriage Date: 1693
- Place: Massachusetts. [9]
- Child: Hannah Babbit
- Child: Elkanah Babbit
- Child: Dorcus Babbit
- Child: Ruth Babbit
- Child: Deliverance Babbit
- Marriage Date: 07 SEP 1654
Last name should be Babbitt per birth record found
Birth
Death
Daughter of Edward & Sarah (Tarne) Babbitt. Died after 20 Mar 1726/7 [11]
Sources
- ↑ Source: #S77
- ↑ Source: #S78 Page: Source number: 579.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: RMF
- ↑ Source: #S80
- ↑ Source: #S77
- ↑ Source: #S78 Page: Source number: 579.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: RMF
- ↑ Source: #S80
- ↑ Source: #S77
- ↑ Source: #S80
- ↑ Source: #S78 Page: Source number: 579.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: RMF
- ↑ "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCV3-FY5 : 4 December 2014), Ruth Babbitt, 07 Aug 1671; citing TAUNTON,BRISTOL,MASSACHUSETTS, ; FHL microfilm 0844826 IT 1-3.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/33746564/ruth-caswell : accessed 11 October 2021), memorial page for Ruth Babbitt Caswell (7 Aug 1671–20 Mar 1726), Find a Grave Memorial ID 33746564, ; Maintained by Linda Mac (contributor 47062703) Unknown.
- Source: S77 Author: Ancestry.com Title: International, Find A Grave Index for Select Locations, 1300s-Current Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Repository: #R8 Repository: R8
- Source: S78 Author: Yates Publishing Title: U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Repository: #R8
- Source: S80 Author: Ancestry.com Title: U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700 Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Repository: #R8
- "North America, Family Histories, 1500." 2000 for Samuel Caswell https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/61157/46155_b289633-00122?indiv=try&h=491394&pid=491394&db. Accessed 5 May. 2020.
- Married 1693 in Mass.- US International marriage records
- Acknowledgments:
- Thank you to Terry Kraft for creating WikiTree profile Bobet-10 through the import of Missing As and Bs from Kraft-Banks Family_2013-02-08.ged on Feb 8, 2013.
- Thank you to Donnie Perrie for creating WikiTree profile Bobbett-9 through the import of Donald Perrie.ged on Apr 8, 2013.
- This biography was auto-generated by a GEDCOM import. Babbit-37 was created by JoAnn Miller through the import of Pitts Family Wiki.ged on Oct 10, 2014.
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or
ask our community of genealogists a question.
Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth:
-
~0.39%
Patty Freeman
:
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch A035341 [compare], Ancestry member pattyfl
-
~0.39%
Klaus Dingarten :
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch HP8610903 [compare]
+
MyHeritage DNA
-
~0.39%
Dana Archer :
MyHeritage DNA
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Comments: 10
Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Robin Lee
Robin Lee
Patty Freeman
Patty Freeman
Terry Kraft
Terry Kraft
Robin Lee
JoAnn (Pike) Miller
Bobet-10 and Babbit-37 appear to represent the same person because: They have the same parents, spouse and vital statistics
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by JoAnn (Pike) Miller
JoAnn (Pike) Miller
Sorry, I was looking at another person. I will confirm the merge
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by JoAnn (Pike) Miller
JoAnn (Pike) Miller
Bobet-10 and Babbit-37 are not ready to be merged because: I believe the parents of Ruth Bobet/Babbitt are incorrect.
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by JoAnn (Pike) Miller
Robin Lee
"Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCV3-FY5 : 5 January 2021), Ruth Babbitt, 1671. So, do you believe that this is a different person? You have the birth date that is on this birth record. Can you take a second look?
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by Robin Lee
Robin Lee
Bobet-10 and Babbit-37 appear to represent the same person because: same husband, birth record on Bobet-10 indicates name as Babbit
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by Robin Lee
Patty Freeman
married 1693 in MA per US and International marriage records
posted
on Bobet-10 (merged)
by Patty Freeman
Patty Freeman
same spouse, same DOB as Babbit-37
posted
on Bobet-10 (merged)
by Patty Freeman
Terry Kraft
Bobet-10 and Babbit-37 are not ready to be merged because: I too believe these are the same person, but also believe "Bobet" is the correct spelling. See the The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, 1847-2011 at http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=NEGenReg&h=118287&indiv=try . I believe "Babbitt" (with two T's, although one or more kin could have used only one T)) wasn't used until the next generation. So, I propose Babbit-37 be merged into Bobet-10.
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by Terry Kraft
Terry Kraft
I too believe these are the same person, but also believe "Bobet" is the correct spelling. See the The New England Historical & Genealogical Register, 1847-2011 at http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=NEGenReg&h=118287&indiv=try . I believe "Babbitt" (with two T's, although one or more kin could have used only one T)) wasn't used until the next generation.
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by Terry Kraft
Robin Lee
Bobet-10 and Babbit-37 appear to represent the same person because: same dates and husband, correct spelling of last name is Babbit per "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FCV3-FY5 : 4 December 2014), Ruth Babbitt, 07 Aug 1671; citing TAUNTON,BRISTOL,MASSACHUSETTS, ; FHL microfilm 0844826 IT 1-3.
posted
on Babbit-37 (merged)
by Robin Lee
Featured National Park champion connections: Ruth is 13 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 19 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 10 degrees from George Catlin, 14 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 21 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 11 degrees from George Grinnell, 24 degrees from Anton Kröller, 13 degrees from Stephen Mather, 20 degrees from Kara McKean, 15 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 25 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.