no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elizabeth (Babcock) Burdick (1729)

Elizabeth Burdick formerly Babcock
Born in Westerly, Kings, Rhode Islandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1 Dec 1751 in Rhode Islandmap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Westerly Rhode Islandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Sara Rice private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 12 Dec 2017
This page has been accessed 538 times.
This profile is part of the Babcock Name Study.

Biography

Elizabeth was the daughter of Samuel Babcock and Anne Pendleton. [1] She married John Burdick.[2] Their children were:

1. Hannah Burdick[3] m. Robert Brown
2. Maxson Burdick 1752
3. Thompson Burdick 1753
4. Anne Burdick 1755
5. John Burdick 1756
6. Paul Burdick 1759
7. Abigail Burdick 1761
8. Sarah Burdick 1763
9. Frances Burdick 1765
10. Joshua Burdick 1768

Elizabeth lived in Westerly Rhode Island.[4]

Note

According to the Babcock Genealogy by Stephen Babcock, there are two other Elizabeths who have been named as the spouse of John Burdick. Because their births are close together and no other marriages for "Elizabeth Babcock" there is no way to differentiate between the two women. Therefore, it seems best to link both Elizabeth Babcocks to John Burdick. Here are links to both references for Elizabeths: Samuel Babcock and Anne Pendleton Babcock, Stephen. Babcock genealogy New York, Eaton & Mains, 1903, P. 61.

2. Daughter of George Babcock and Susanna Potter

Babcock, Stephen. Babcock genealogy New York, Eaton & Mains, 1903, P. 85.

Sources

  1. Ancestry.com. Rhode Island, Vital Extracts, 1636-1899 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014.
    Name: Elizabeth Babcock
    Birth Date: 6 May 1729
    Birth Place: Westerly, Rhode Island, USA
    Father Name: Samuel Babcock
    Mother Name: Ann Babcock
    Page Number: 73
  2. Ancestry.com. Rhode Island, Vital Extracts, 1636-1899 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014.
    Name: Elizabeth Babcock
    Marriage Date: 1 Dec 1751
    Marriage Place: Rhode Island, USA
    Spouse Name: John Burdick
    Page Number: 6
  3. Brown, Cyrus Henry. Brown Genealogy, Many of the Descendants of Thomas, John, & Eleazer Brown. Boston, The Everett Press Company. Volume II; Part 1; 1915, page 175.
  4. Year: 1782; Census Place: Westerly, Washington, Rhode Island. Name: Elizabeth Widow Burdick. Ancestry.com. Rhode Island, Compiled Census and Census Substitutes Index, 1740-1890 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.




Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Elizabeth's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Significant revision now done to the John Burdick profile. You were correct not to merge the two Elizabeths. Only this one was the spouse of John Burdick. The Babcock-4567 bio should be revised to delete the children. She and her husband Beriah Brown didn't have any.
posted by John French Ph.D.
Babcock-4567 and Babcock-3013 do not represent the same person because: These are two distinct people. Unless their is clear proof of who her father is, They should NOT be merged. If you read each bio, it explains why.
posted by Sara Rice
Yes, I had read both biographies before I proposed the merge. It seems that we should move forward on the presumption that neither set of parents is certain at this point, which perhaps means that she should be detached from both sets of parents. You could put statements into the biography of the merged profile for Elizabeth pointing to the possibility of either set being her parents. The main thing, though, is that certainly Elizabeth, the wife of John Burdick, was not 2 different people.
posted by John French Ph.D.
Babcock-4567 and Babcock-3013 appear to represent the same person because: Both represent the spouse of John Burdick.
posted by John French Ph.D.
Since they are not the same person, they cannot be merged.
posted by Sara Rice

B  >  Babcock  |  B  >  Burdick  >  Elizabeth (Babcock) Burdick

Categories: Rhode Island, Babcock Name Study