no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Anna Catharine (Bachman) Witmer (1720 - 1792)

Anna Catharine (Anna) "Catharina" Witmer formerly Bachman aka Baughman
Born in Canton, Zurich, Switzerlandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married Mar 1738 in Lancaster, Lancaster, Pennsylvaniamap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 72 in Lebanon Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Palatine Migration WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Dec 2012
This page has been accessed 1,147 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Anna (Bachman) Witmer was a Palatine Migrant.
Join: Palatine Migration Project
Discuss: palatine_migration

Biography

Anna was born about 1720 and was the daughter of Michael Bachman[1] and Katharine Steiner. She passed away in 1792.

Named in Father's 1756 Will
Name: Michael Baughman, Yeoman of Manheim Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Will written: March 28th, 1755
Will proven: October 30th, 1756
Names:
Wife: Catherine
Sons: Peter, John, Michael, Christian
Daughters:
Barbara with husband Jacob Stoner
Anna with husband Peter Whitmore
Lissey with husband Sebastian Lesher
Elizabeth with husband Christian Hershy
Frena not married
Maudlina not married
Pennsylvania Probate Records, 1683-1994 Lancaster Wills 1730-1773 vol A-B page 209/514
https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G99B-VZVY?i=209&wc=9PM8-4WY%3A268493801%2C268514701%3Fcc%3D1999196&cc=1999196

In 1811 a settlement of the estate of Anna's brother Christian BACHMAN listed the following children of Peter WITMER and wife Anna BACHMAN: Michael, Feronica, Barbarra, Elizabeth who married RODENBAUGH, Catherine who married HORST, and Peter WITMER.

Which Peter Witmer was she married to: Peter Witmer b. 1712 in Hasselbach near Sinsheim in Baden (son of Michael), or an older Peter Witmer b. 1698 possibly still in Canton Zurich?

Sources

  1. Although his will shows the name Baughman, it appears that her father was using the Bachman spelling when he arrived in America c. 1712: https://archive.org/details/collectionofupwa00ruppuoft/page/436
  • Family Data Collection - Births: Name: Anna Baughman; Father: Michael Baughman; Mother: Katharine Steiner; Birth Date: 1720; City: Conastoga; County: Chester; State: Pennsylvania
  • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Mennonite Vital Records, 1750-2014; Name: Anna Baughman; Relationship: Child
  • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Mennonite Vital Records, 1750-2014; Name: Anna Baughman; Relationship: Spouse; Marriage Date: 1738
  • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Mennonite Vital Records, 1750-2014; Name: Anna Baughman; Relationship: Mother-in-law
  • U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900; Name: Anna Baughman; Gender: Female; Birth Place: Pennsylvania; Birth Year: 1720; Spouse Name: Peter Witmer; Spouse Birth Place: SW; Spouse Birth Year: 1712; Marriage Year: 1738; Marriage State: Pennsylvania; Number Pages: 1
  • U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current; Name: Anna Witmer; Birth Date: 1720; Death Date: Feb 1792; Cemetery: Masonville Mennonite Cemetery; Burial or Cremation Place: Washington Boro, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA; Has Bio? Yes

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile created by Judith Painter-McGregor on December 5, 2012. Click the Changes tab for the details of edits by Judith and others.
  • Thanks to George Whitmer for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by George and others.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Anna by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Anna:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Images: 1
Leaves
Leaves



Comments: 18

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
https://www.wikitree.com/treewidget/Bachman-156/300

Anna Bachman, born in 1720, is attached as the spouse of Peter Widmer, born 1698 and Peter Witmer, born 1712.

I think she should be detached from the Peter Widmer, born in 1698.

There is some confusion also with the two on https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/LR19-3QG, which has bios for both Peters. Also indicates that Peter Widmer, born 1698 may be the father of Johan Peter Witmer Witmer-234.

posted by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
edited by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
Anna Baughman 1720-1763 married to Peter Witmer 1712-1795 - Also Michael Baughman 1700-1756 And Katherine Steiner are Anna parents, and Michael Witmer is Peter's Father.

Married 02 March 1738 Lancaster co. PA. "Roots Finder," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:3:M9L5-2M4 : accessed 2023-08-14), entry for Peter Witmer, cites sources; "User:eflotte Tree:My Tree" file (2:3:2:MMMW-F43), submitted 2021-12-27 by EFlotte.

posted by [Living Seifert]
edited by [Living Seifert]
The link in your comment takes me to a family tree but not to a source
posted by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
I've removed the elder Peter as a spouse. I don't see any evidence to support it.
posted by Dave Rutherford
Bachman-1445 and Bachman-156 appear to represent the same person because: Same person
posted by Edward Flotte
Please remove Witmer-312 as wife of Bachman-156. I have modified Witmer-312 to make him consistent with the profiles representing his ancestry and I now find that he is much too young to have been the Peter Witmer husband of Bachman-156. Thank You.
posted by Cecil Stuerke
Done! Thanks, Cecil.

This line added because "Your comment must be at least 30 characters long."

posted by Ellen Smith
Barbara was only married to one Johann Peter Witmer. Her husband is the son of Johannes Cunrad Widmer 1663-1753 and his wife Katharina Graber 1665-..
posted by William Thomas
Bachman-1085 and Bachman-156 appear to represent the same person because: date range and name
posted by Janet (Ramage) Binkley
Bachman-1085 and Bachman-156 are not ready to be merged because: DOB’s are widely spread. Also parents are only supplied for one.
posted by [Living Kilmer]
Bachman-1085 and Bachman-156 appear to represent the same person because: The data is a match. Please merge
posted by Cecil Stuerke
Removed PPP to merge into Bachman. Agreed that both spellings are used, but evidence favors use of Bachman in Europe, changing to Baughman at some point before her father's death.
posted by Dave Rutherford
I found a bio on FamilySearch attached to Michael Baughman which I will post the link for here. Paraphrasing: …"he came as Baughman and changed to Bachman..." It has some source information in it. We may want to email the poster (Lee White) for more details.

https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/collaborate/LDR5-W3Y

posted by William Thomas
I've located the profiles of the family on FamilySearch and attached the father's will to them. His profile is at:

https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/LDR5-W3Y

The 7 FamilySearch sources for Michael Baughman only show this spelling of his surname and one has Bachman as an alternative. None are actual record images other than the will.

However, FamilySearch surnames displayed for his father, Michael's siblings, and Michael's children are highly variable. Baughman 9 uses, Bachman 8 uses, Bauman 1, Baumann 1, Bachmann 4. I feel that the father Michael was using Baughman upon arrival in America. Most of his siblings used it, but not all.

At this time in history, there were practically no standardized spellings. And, Anglicizing of surnames was rampant. Still uncertain.

posted by William Thomas
Prior to merge, need a discussion of the correct LNAB.

It appears that her father was using Bachman when he arrived in America c. 1712: https://archive.org/details/collectionofupwa00ruppuoft/page/436

But the name is spelled Baughman on his 1756 will.

My initial examination of material on Ancestry revealed that there are historic sites known as "Bachman's Mill" and "Bachman's Run" suggesting the continuity of that name.

But looking just now, I've found two documents from 1751 and 1759 which both give the Baughman spelling, so perhaps Baughman needs to be the father's current last name, and the LNAB for his children, including Anna.

Any thoughts?

posted by Dave Rutherford
Baugham-15 and Bachman-156 appear to represent the same person because: same person - same husband - Bachman is original spelling
posted by Dave Rutherford
Bachman-268 and Bachman-156 appear to represent the same person because: same person - later birth date is likely correct
posted by Dave Rutherford

B  >  Bachman  |  W  >  Witmer  >  Anna Catharine (Bachman) Witmer

Categories: Palatine Migrants