In 1811 a settlement of the estate of Anna's brother Christian BACHMAN listed the following children of Peter WITMER and wife Anna BACHMAN: Michael, Feronica, Barbarra, Elizabeth who married RODENBAUGH, Catherine who married HORST, and Peter WITMER.
Which Peter Witmer was she married to: Peter Witmer b. 1712 in Hasselbach near Sinsheim in Baden (son of Michael), or an older Peter Witmer b. 1698 possibly still in Canton Zurich?
U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900; Name: Anna Baughman; Gender: Female; Birth Place: Pennsylvania; Birth Year: 1720; Spouse Name: Peter Witmer; Spouse Birth Place: SW; Spouse Birth Year: 1712; Marriage Year: 1738; Marriage State: Pennsylvania; Number Pages: 1
U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current; Name: Anna Witmer; Birth Date: 1720; Death Date: Feb 1792; Cemetery: Masonville Mennonite Cemetery; Burial or Cremation Place: Washington Boro, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, USA; Has Bio? Yes
Acknowledgements
WikiTree profile created by Judith Painter-McGregor on December 5, 2012. Click the Changes tab for the details of edits by Judith and others.
Thanks to George Whitmer for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by George and others.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Anna by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Anna:
Anna Baughman 1720-1763 married to Peter Witmer 1712-1795 - Also Michael Baughman 1700-1756 And Katherine Steiner are Anna parents, and Michael Witmer is Peter's Father.
Married 02 March 1738 Lancaster co. PA.
"Roots Finder," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:3:M9L5-2M4 : accessed 2023-08-14), entry for Peter Witmer, cites sources; "User:eflotte Tree:My Tree" file (2:3:2:MMMW-F43), submitted 2021-12-27 by EFlotte.
Please remove Witmer-312 as wife of Bachman-156. I have modified Witmer-312 to make him consistent with the profiles representing his ancestry and I now find that he is much too young to have been the Peter Witmer husband of Bachman-156. Thank You.
Removed PPP to merge into Bachman. Agreed that both spellings are used, but evidence favors use of Bachman in Europe, changing to Baughman at some point before her father's death.
I found a bio on FamilySearch attached to Michael Baughman which I will post the link for here. Paraphrasing: "he came as Baughman and changed to Bachman..." It has some source information in it. We may want to email the poster (Lee White) for more details.
The 7 FamilySearch sources for Michael Baughman only show this spelling of his surname and one has Bachman as an alternative. None are actual record images other than the will.
However, FamilySearch surnames displayed for his father, Michael's siblings, and Michael's children are highly variable. Baughman 9 uses, Bachman 8 uses, Bauman 1, Baumann 1, Bachmann 4. I feel that the father Michael was using Baughman upon arrival in America. Most of his siblings used it, but not all.
At this time in history, there were practically no standardized spellings. And, Anglicizing of surnames was rampant. Still uncertain.
But the name is spelled Baughman on his 1756 will.
My initial examination of material on Ancestry revealed that there are historic sites known as "Bachman's Mill" and "Bachman's Run" suggesting the continuity of that name.
But looking just now, I've found two documents from 1751 and 1759 which both give the Baughman spelling, so perhaps Baughman needs to be the father's current last name, and the LNAB for his children, including Anna.
Anna Bachman, born in 1720, is attached as the spouse of Peter Widmer, born 1698 and Peter Witmer, born 1712.
I think she should be detached from the Peter Widmer, born in 1698.
There is some confusion also with the two on https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/LR19-3QG, which has bios for both Peters. Also indicates that Peter Widmer, born 1698 may be the father of Johan Peter Witmer Witmer-234.
edited by Janne (Shoults) Gorman
Married 02 March 1738 Lancaster co. PA. "Roots Finder," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/2:3:M9L5-2M4 : accessed 2023-08-14), entry for Peter Witmer, cites sources; "User:eflotte Tree:My Tree" file (2:3:2:MMMW-F43), submitted 2021-12-27 by EFlotte.
edited by [Living Seifert]
This line added because "Your comment must be at least 30 characters long."
https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/collaborate/LDR5-W3Y
https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/sources/LDR5-W3Y
The 7 FamilySearch sources for Michael Baughman only show this spelling of his surname and one has Bachman as an alternative. None are actual record images other than the will.
However, FamilySearch surnames displayed for his father, Michael's siblings, and Michael's children are highly variable. Baughman 9 uses, Bachman 8 uses, Bauman 1, Baumann 1, Bachmann 4. I feel that the father Michael was using Baughman upon arrival in America. Most of his siblings used it, but not all.
At this time in history, there were practically no standardized spellings. And, Anglicizing of surnames was rampant. Still uncertain.
It appears that her father was using Bachman when he arrived in America c. 1712: https://archive.org/details/collectionofupwa00ruppuoft/page/436
But the name is spelled Baughman on his 1756 will.
My initial examination of material on Ancestry revealed that there are historic sites known as "Bachman's Mill" and "Bachman's Run" suggesting the continuity of that name.
But looking just now, I've found two documents from 1751 and 1759 which both give the Baughman spelling, so perhaps Baughman needs to be the father's current last name, and the LNAB for his children, including Anna.
Any thoughts?